Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Showing posts with label Boycott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Boycott. Show all posts

Saturday, August 29, 2020

Boycotting Themselves Out of Business?

By skipping games for nebulous political demands, pro athletes threaten to alienate fans and crater their own industry.
 
Steven Malanga August 28, 2020

 With their boycott of games earlier this week to protest the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin, athletes in the National Basketball Association and Major League Baseball have crossed a bridge that they may find difficult to return from. Though professional athletes have become increasingly politicized since former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick began his “Star Spangled Banner” protests in 2016, the widespread cancellation of games, including NBA playoff contests, is unprecedented.

The walkout in support of Blake, who was wanted on a sexual-assault charge and whose own girlfriend called the cops on him, hardly represents the kind of compelling case against police brutality one might build a mass movement around. If players, in the midst of a pandemic slowdown already costing professional sports billions of dollars, were willing to shut down their industry in this instance, how frequently will they feel compelled, or even pressured, to do the same in the future? Fans who were already watching less sports may react negatively to being lectured by wealthy athletes who regularly walk off the job.............To Read More....

My Take -This should prove interesting.  Are they still being paid?  If they are then the league won't have to worry about appeasing these stupid, spoiled snowflakes they're paying obscene amounts of money  in order to play a child's game.  They'll be broke, and out of business.  

If they're not paying them it's just delaying the inevitable, but in the short term it will be interesting to see the reaction of these cry babies when they find they're quickly going broke and the only skill they may have outside of throwing a big ball through a big metal ring, in spite of the fact most of them graduated from some college or other, is washing dishes in a restaurant. 

Also, their moral blindness and hypocrisy is demonstrated in this piece, so this isn't a moral issue, it's a political power play, and they need to pay a penalty for it. 

Monday, December 9, 2013

Outlawing eco-based secondary boycotts

By Mark Poynter - posted Wednesday, 9 October 2013
A secondary boycott is an attempt to influence the actions of one business by exerting pressure on another related business through the market place. An example was when environmental groups pressured the ANZ Bank to withhold finance for a pulp mill proposed by one of its customers, Gunns Ltd, on the grounds that the development would allegedly have serious environmental impacts.
Under the Competition and Consumer Affairs Act 2010 (the Act) secondary boycotts of Australian companies aimed at restricting company trading are - with two exceptions – outlawed, and targetted companies can expect the ACCC and the courts to protect them. However, the Act currently allows secondary boycotts that are either designed to protect consumers, or are substantially related to environmental protection.
Last month, the new Federal Government signalled its intent to amend the Act to remove the exemption that allows secondary boycotts related to environmental protection. Companies that have been targetted by boycotts allowed under this exemption have long complained that the lack of accountability afforded by the Act has effectively given eNGOs a licence to unfairly denigrate them through sensationally false or misleading environmental claims......To Read More......