UK Legalizes Muslims Stabbing People If They’re Offended

Daniel Greenfield @ Sultan Knish Blog

On the heels of the UK recognizing an Islamic terrorist state in Israel, police arrested the third known person for criticizing Hamas and released a Muslim man who had gone on a stabbing spree after he saw a Koran being burned. Or as the judge in the case put it, “the holy Koran.”

Who is the Koran holy to? The political and judicial systems of the United Kingdom which have effectively enacted Islamic Sharia blasphemy law by selectively prosecuting those who offend Islam. But not those who offend the religious sensibilities of Christians or Jews. Do whatever you like with a cross or a bible, but touch a Koran and you’re not only under arrest.

You’re also fair game for a stabbing.

Hamit Coskun, a half-Armenian and half-Kurdish gentleman, both of whose halves have suffered from genocide under Turkish Islamist rule, decided to protest by burning a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London while shouting “Islam is religion of terrorism”.

Moussa Kadri set out to prove him right by fetching a knife and stabbing at him while shouting, “I’m going to kill you”. The Muslim terrorist explained to the police that he was just out to “protect my religion” in the traditional Islamic fashion through violence.

And the British authorities were typically understanding of Muslim violence against non-Muslims.

Moussa Kadrhas, the Muslim stabber, was freed on bail, while Hamit Coskun, the non-violent non-Muslim stabber, was kept locked up. In the UK, being stabbed by a Muslim is considered a more serious sign of guilt than the actual stabbing. And the authorities were much more worried about Coskun, a self-proclaimed “atheist” and “critic of Islam” on the loose, than just another one of the thousands of Muslim terrorists who are already freely running around the country.

The stabbing victim was charged with the unique crime of “having intent to cause against the religious institution of Islam”. This had not previously been a crime in any non-Muslim country, but with a Muslim ‘justice minister’ enforcing Islamic law, that may no longer be an accurate description of the United Kingdom anyway.

When the case came before the court of justice, District Judge John McGarva denounced Hamit Coskun for his “highly provocative” behavior. “Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language in some cases directed toward the religion and were motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.”

The Muslim stabber’s trial however was far more leniently handled.

Even though Moussa had allegedly shouted “I’m going to kill you” while stabbing at another human being (or at least a human being), he was only charged with possession of a knife and common assault, not attempted murder. The authorities allowed the stabber to send in a picture of the knife and he sent in a picture of a palette knife rather than the bread knife he actually used.

The stabber’s judge was as kind and understanding as the stabbee’s judge had not been.

Judge Adam Hiddleston, who had previously been part of an organization that defended Muslim illegal alien invaders, let the Muslim stabber go with a suspended sentence because “you were clearly deeply offended by a man who was protesting outside the consulate and who as part of his protest had set fire to the holy Quran.” Whom was the Koran holy to? Hiddleston.

“I see no reason for that sentence to result in immediate custody,” Judge Hiddleston twiddled, describing the Muslim stabber as a “highly respected and valued individual” and claimed, without evidence that, “there is an almost non-existent chance of repetition of this behavior.”

Almost. Unless he sees something else that offends his finely honed Islamic sensibilities.

In the UK, ordinary people condemning Islamic violence and mass migration have been jailed, but Muslim violence against them is virtually a victimless crime.

To convince the public of this, the BBC state media ran a gentle smiling picture of the Muslim stabber and an angry scowling picture of the non-Muslim whom he had stabbed. You could try to ignore the BBC and its hackneyed Ministry of Truth propaganda, but under recently passed 1984ish laws, state media must be embedded in smart TVs and soon on YouTube.

While burning a copy of the Koran, Hamit Coskun had carried a t-shirt stating that, “Islam is a terrorist ideology. The Quran should be banned”. And he “told the police that he had decided to burn the Quran because he had studied it extensively and that it incited people to terrorism and encourages the beheading of non-believers.” The half-Armenian and half-Kurdish man fully proved his case, not in the UK court system, but where it really matters, in the court of reality.

He had proven it so well that the British authorities locked him up, freed his Muslim attacker and then apologized to his stabber for all the trouble that had been caused by offending him.

If the British authorities really didn’t believe that Islam and the Koran are the bearers of violent ideologies, they would treat them the way that they do Christianity and Judaism, or at least Hinduism and Buddhism, rather than cowering, flattering and appeasing Muslims, while ruthlessly silencing any political dissent with police squads and prison sentences.

When Coskun burned a Koran, two random Muslims, Moussa Kadri and a nameless delivery man (if stabbing a non-Muslim protester who is offending Islam doesn’t earn a prison sentence, kicking him certainly won’t even merit an arrest) quickly turned to violence. That’s the real issue.

Rather than stop Muslims from stabbing, running over and bombing people, a policy that European governments had fitfully tried, they’ve moved on to legalizing Muslim violence.

In the UK, it’s now illegal to tweet “F___ Hamas” but mostly legal to stab non-Muslims.

The next step will be to legalize bombing buses (perhaps on the anniversary of 7/7) and then hijacking planes and flying them into buildings as long as Islam has been properly offended.

This is well beyond blasphemy law. Even of the Islamic kind. There are other better names for it. Cowardice, collaboration, treason and Quislingism will do for a start. The Starmer government along with many of its sort are little better than the Petain government in France. They are collaborators put into power by the invaders to suppress any dissent against their rule while making noises that they represent the interests of the nation they’re selling out every day.

Moussa Kadri stabbed Coskun from the front, PM Keir Starmer is stabbing England in the back.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation.  Thank you for reading.

 

Islamized Tennessee: Muslim Family Violently Attacks Son for Christian Conversion, Exposing the Dangers of Apostasy in the West (Video)

Amy Mek December 14, 2023

Islamic teachings, as confirmed by the words and deeds of Muhammad, state that those who abandon Islam are to be executed............In a harrowing example of the extreme dangers faced by Muslims who dare to leave their faith or adopt Western values, an Islamic family in Nashville, Tennessee, was arrested for a brutal assault on their son, who converted to Christianity...........The victim, subjected to a vicious attack by his own family, told the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department (MNPD) that his father, Nick Kadum, mother, Rawaa Khawaji, and brother, John Kadum, physically assaulted him. This assault was not just an act of violence but a clear message to the victim and others like him: deviating from Islam can have dire consequences, even in Western countries renowned for their religious freedoms......To Read More....

Muslim Family in Nashville Assaults Son for Converting to Christianity - By Daniel Greenfield • December 13, 2023 - “His family demanded he take back his Christianity belief and say he was a Muslim”.  Don’t worry, they’re moderates. If they were extremists, he wouldn’t have lived long enough for the police to save him............

My Take - That's Islam, that's always been Islam, and that will always be Islam. Anything else is mere misdirection to confuse and fool the misinformed, the uninformed, and the gullible.  This is the "religion" George Bush called the "religion of peace".  He really was as dumb as the Democrats said he was.  Here are the real foundational values of Islam.  Hate, greed, lust, envy, and violence.  That's history, and that history is incontestable.  Get over it!

Germany: Students Arm Themselves Against Muslim Migrants

Hugh Fitzgerald September 29, 2023

As is by now well known, very few of the millions of Muslims who have been arriving in Europe are true “asylum seekers,” though a great many claim to be; they are very rarely fleeing persecution and murder. They are, instead, economic migrants, eager to batten on the benefits that the generous welfare states of western Europe provide. 

These include free or greatly-subsidized housing, free medical care, free education (including vocational training), unemployment benefits (even without a work history in Europe), family allowances, and more. But for some Muslims, even that largesse is not enough. They want more, and they supplement their welfare benefits with the proceeds from street robberies and house burglaries. Muslims in France, though only 10% of the population, make up 50-60% of the prisoners. 

In the UK., Muslims are 4% of the population, but 25% of prisoners. In Germany, Muslims are 5% of the population, and 23% of prisoners. Muslims committing crimes of property often use violence to intimidate their victims. In one city in Germany, having lost faith in the police’s ability to adequately protect the population from this Muslim crime wave, older students, and parents, too, have organized patrols and self-defense groups. More on this development can be found here: “Germany: Students arm themselves in city of Halle as violent robberies soar, parents describe ‘broken police force,’” by John Cody, Remix News, September 22, 2023:............To Read More..

Muslim Mobs Get a Pass for Assaulting Jews in NYC and LA

By Daniel Greenfield July 24, 2023 In May 2021 @ Sultan Knish Blog

Joseph Borgen was violently assaulted by a Muslim mob while walking down the street in midtown Manhattan in the vicinity of an anti-Israel rally. The Jewish man was kicked, punched, pepper sprayed, beaten with a metal object, and ended up in the hospital.

Borgen was taunted as a “dirty Jew” and the assault was caught on video. “They were kicking me in my ribs, my stomach,” he described.

Waseem Awawdeh, the best known of the attackers, was out two days later. Even after Awawdeh reportedly told prison guards, “If I could do it again, I would do it again”, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg offered him a plea deal of only six months in prison. After public outrage, including protests and condemnations by elected officials, it was raised to eighteen months.

Faisal Elezzi, another of the attackers, got off with probation and an obligation to complete “anti-bias programming”.

That same month in Los Angeles, a pro-terrorist Muslim convoy was driving down the street near the Jewish neighborhood of Fairfax, and began harassing outdoor diners at a sushi place. Members of the Muslim mob waved a PLO terror flag, demanded to know who at the restaurant was Jewish, and witnesses said chanted, “death to the Jews” and “free Palestine”.

The Muslim attackers reportedly punched, kicked, threw bottles and pepper sprayed their targets who were members of the Persian Jewish community who had fled Islamic violence in Iran.

Samer Jayylusi and Xavier Pabon were arrested and immediately released on bail. They have since been sentenced to probation and ordered to visit a Holocaust museum.

Editors Note:  At this point in the original article there are two videos here which I can't reproduce, so please go to the original article. RK

The assaults in Manhattan and Los Angeles went viral. Videos of Muslim mobs attacking Jews made their way around the country and the world. They ended up appearing in national news stories. And yet most of those suspects got off with a slap on the wrist and diversity training.

“We take these cases extraordinarily seriously. That sort of hate has no place in Manhattan,” Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg had claimed.

“A hate crime is a crime against all of us,” Los Angeles DA George Gascon had promised, referring to the case. “My office is committed to doing all we can to make Los Angeles County a place where our diversity is embraced and protected.”

Both district attorneys have been linked to the pro-crime progressive prosecutor networks championed by George Soros as well as other leftist billionaires. And their promises of justice evaporated into consequences that could barely qualify as a slap on the wrist.

Of the four defendants sentenced so far in these four cases, whose sentences are known, three received probation and anti-bias classes. 75% of the perpetrators in these Muslim mobs may have spent only a few days in prison and have walked away with nothing except some classes.

The message that has been sent by DA Alvin Bragg, DA George Gascon and Judge Laura F Priver of the California Superior Court is that Muslim attacks on Jews will go unpunished. According to reports, Judge Priver thought that “counseling and Museum of Tolerance program was a better solution than sending the two to state prison as the prosecution had requested.”

While these two Muslim mob attacks on Jews caught the attention of the world, there have been individual assaults that have gone unnoticed and mostly unpunished.

Also in 2021, Suleiman Othman accosted Blake Zavadsky in a Brooklyn neighborhood with a sizable Jewish and Muslim presence and demanded, “Why do you support those dirty Jews? What are you doing in my neighborhood?” Othman then assaulted the Jewish man.

“The hateful and unprovoked assault this defendant admitted to today left one victim hurt, but also shook an entire community,” District Attorney Eric Gonzalez declared. “His conviction, jail time and probation should send a message that this kind of intolerance has serious consequences.”

In reality, Othman was offered a six month plea deal and when he turned that down, got only 60 days in prison and probation.

DA Gonzalez, like Bragg and Gascon, is a pro-crime prosecutor who ran on a platform of reducing incarceration. He’s a member of pro-crime organizations like the Soros-funded Fair and Just Prosecution alliance of prosecutors who commit to giving criminals a pass.

Gonzalez’s office had previously resisted filling hate crime charges against Farrukh Afzal, a Muslim cab driver who tried to run over a Jewish man, then after failing to hit him, got out and assaulted a second Jewish man, Rabbi Lipa Schwartz, 62, while shouting, “Allah, Allah” and declaring that he wanted to “kill all Jews”.

The Pakistani Muslim severely beat the rabbi who had been on the way to synagogue for morning prayers. He shoved him to the ground and repeatedly hit him in the head. When another Jewish man attempted to intervene, Afzal attacked him too, until he was finally restrained.

The DA’s office had attempted to dismiss it as a road rage incident with no hate crime element to it even though Afzal had eight prior arrests. Eventually he was convicted, but not of hate crimes, and while he was supposed to have been sentenced, there is no word on the outcome. No records appear for anyone by that name in the city system while the state system shows a man by that name who committed assault had a parole interview date last year.

Antisemitic attacks are routinely greeted by promises that they are being taken very seriously followed by the offenders quietly getting a slap on the wrist. Millions watched videos or read news stories about the violent Muslim mob attacks in New York City and Los Angeles. Only thousands are aware that most of the perpetrators walked away with anti-bias classes.

Pro-crime DAs like Bragg, Gonzalez and Gascon claim to take ‘hate’ very seriously, while remaining committed to a criminal justice reform movement that rewards criminals.

It is difficult to know to what extent the slaps on the wrist for Muslim mob attacks on Jews are due to sympathy for the ideological antisemitic motives of the perpetrators or a general belief that violent criminals should be coddled rather than being locked up. But to the victims it really doesn’t make much of a difference. The targets of Muslim antisemitic violence may be collateral damage in a pro-crime movement or leftist solidarity with terror supporters.

But the message to both Muslim mobs and the Jewish community is abundantly clear.

In the two cities with some of the largest Jewish populations in the country, Jews are fair game. Muslim thugs have little to fear from the legal system when they attack Jews except a few days in prison and a visit to a Holocaust museum.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. 

Thank you for reading.