President
Barack Obama told the graduating Army officers at West Point on Wednesday that
fighting "climate change" will "help shape your time in
uniform……."That spirit of cooperation," Obama said, "needs to
energize the global effort to combat climate change--a creeping national
security crisis that will help shape your time in uniform, as we are called on
to respond to refugee flows and natural disasters and conflicts over water and
food, which is why next year I intend to make sure America is out front in
putting together a global framework to preserve our planet.
Robert Spencer continues on Obama’s Absurd West Point Speech by
pointing out that “Terrorism is our most direct threat.We just can’t talk about it.” At the West Point presentation Obama claims to "believe
in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being," President Obama
told the nation's newest Army officers at West Point on Wednesday. No he
doesn't, said conservative talk-show host Mark Levin, according to Levin: 'Somebody Who Wants to Fundamentally
Transform America' Doesn't Believe It's Exceptional.
I have posted these following articles from Jon Ray’s
Greenie Watch and appear between Marita Noon’s article, “Welcome to the “no pee” section of the swimming pool”, and Alan Caruba’s article, “The Slow Sure Death of Climate Change”. I would like to point out that there have been a great many people - including me - who predicted this eventuality, and that the green movement would finely start to lose credibility over this.
Evidence mounts against climate change, Obama acts anyway - It has been a bad month in the media for the environmentalist crowd. News has come out that polar bears — a bread and butter fundraising dynamo endangered species for the global warmist crisis machine — may not be in danger at all. The ferocious predators that have been repackaged as cute, cuddly Coke swilling stuff toys are significant because the species became the first to be declared “endangered” by the U.S. government due to the presumed warming trend.
Only one problem – the bears may not be endangered at all.
In fact, scientists who make the population claims about the snow white, nine foot tall behemoths admit that their numerical count that is the basis of the polar bear hysteria is, “simply a qualified guess given to satisfy public demand.”……..[The real] global warming disaster – our nation devolved from the most developed in the world to a third world status all due to Obama’s fealty to an economic suicide pact on the green altar of climate change. SOURCE
Green jobs
myths - The Internet is awash
with websites promoting green jobs. Unlike regular jobs, green jobs are
socially and environmentally responsible. And they are more rewarding and
fulfilling. They give the green-collar worker a sense of belonging to something
greater than himself. As a candidate in 2008, Barack Obama promised five
million high paying green jobs. To green advocates, these jobs have helped
implement the green recovery from the "Great Recession." Many tens of
millions more will be created to build a new Green Economy that will bring
social justice, environmental harmony, and sustainable prosperity to America….."we
have to change everything — the way we live, the way we work, the way we eat,
the way we travel, the way we make things." For those eager to begin green
careers, it's "a wonderful time to get a green job or become a green
entrepreneur." There's no time like the present to prepare for challenges
ahead, such as "species extinction, deforestation, sea pollution,
desertification, topsoil reduction, and freshwater depletion." And what
could be more rewarding and fulfilling than a pat on the back from humanity for
staving off "ecological collapse, major conflict, famine, drought, and
economic depression"?..... Thanks to green economists, who didn't
think that an enormous labor cost differential would matter, American taxpayers
blew $90 billion to create a green manufacturing boom in China….There’s muchmore here and it gets worse….
Prominent
French scientist predicts cooling -Dr. Jean-Louis Pinault is a
proven expert environmental physicist and statistical analyst of global
spatio-temporal data. His publication record leaves no doubt in this regard: Pinault-Google-scholar-profile. Dr. Pinault has developed a model, which he
supports with extensive statistical analyses of global spatio-temporal data,
whereby relatively small solar variations (relative to the large variations
occurring on the lifetime of the Sun) acquire leverage on global climate via an
oceanic resonance tuning that operates on the global ocean oscillations on
Earth.
Dr. Pinault was met with sufficiently significant resistance from the dominant scientific cabal, know as "peer review", to decide to concentrate on writing a book, rather than fighting reviewers and spineless and lazy editors (my words). In his book he both explains his science ideas and exposes the scientific censorship which has frustrated him. His book is "From the melody of the oceans to climate change: a fight against ostracism", and was just released on May 10, 2014…….If he is correct, then it will be even more reason to conclude that modern CO2 increases don't matter and never mattered, regarding modern climate change……SOURCE
Dr. Pinault was met with sufficiently significant resistance from the dominant scientific cabal, know as "peer review", to decide to concentrate on writing a book, rather than fighting reviewers and spineless and lazy editors (my words). In his book he both explains his science ideas and exposes the scientific censorship which has frustrated him. His book is "From the melody of the oceans to climate change: a fight against ostracism", and was just released on May 10, 2014…….If he is correct, then it will be even more reason to conclude that modern CO2 increases don't matter and never mattered, regarding modern climate change……SOURCE
Is Michael
Oppenheimer crumbling on Warmism? - Punts on the crucial question of
climate sensitivity Michael Oppenheimer
was a paid partisan of the environmental pressure group Environmental Defense
and the climatologist to the Hollywood stars. Oppenheimer was the holder of the
“Barbra Streisand Chair of Environmental Studies” at the Environmental Defense
Fund. Streisand explained: “My Foundation started supporting climate change
work in 1989, when I donated a quarter of a million dollars to support the work
of Oppenheimer at EDF.
The following statements were made during the Q&A session of the May 29th House hearing:
Michael Oppenheimer: ‘Some things are more or less settled, some things are not. The question of whether carbon dioxide is 30 to 40 percent above pre-industrial times, that’s settled. The question of exactly how warm the Earth will become as a result, that’s not.’ Oppenheimer refused to defend the 97% claims. ‘Whether the 97% is defensible, I really don’t know.’…… SOURCE
The following statements were made during the Q&A session of the May 29th House hearing:
Michael Oppenheimer: ‘Some things are more or less settled, some things are not. The question of whether carbon dioxide is 30 to 40 percent above pre-industrial times, that’s settled. The question of exactly how warm the Earth will become as a result, that’s not.’ Oppenheimer refused to defend the 97% claims. ‘Whether the 97% is defensible, I really don’t know.’…… SOURCE
Pause in
global warming upsets religious believers - Ross McKitrick is best
known as the Canadian professor who took the so-called hockey stick graph —
which is worshipped unquestioningly by anthropogenic global warming religionists
— and snapped it over his scientific data like a piece of kindling. Now the environmental economics professor at
the University of Guelph is putting his data crunching prowess to work on
global warming climate models and is similarly destroying the credibility of
these forecasts — which are looking less reliable than tarot card reading.
Earlier this week, McKitrick ably showed a crowd of about 300 people at a joint Friends of Science/Frontier Centre for Public Policy luncheon in Calgary how the gap is growing wider and longer between what global warming models predicted and what has actually happened to the world’s climate……McKitrick points out that some climate scientists are scrambling to explain the pause. They’re saying that the oceans are absorbing more heat than expected, or that there are changes in Pacific wind patterns, or that there is poor coverage of the Arctic surface or on declining stratospheric water vapour.
“These are all new hypotheses,” points out McKitrick, “yet the science was supposedly ‘settled’ over a decade ago.”…… SOURCE
Earlier this week, McKitrick ably showed a crowd of about 300 people at a joint Friends of Science/Frontier Centre for Public Policy luncheon in Calgary how the gap is growing wider and longer between what global warming models predicted and what has actually happened to the world’s climate……McKitrick points out that some climate scientists are scrambling to explain the pause. They’re saying that the oceans are absorbing more heat than expected, or that there are changes in Pacific wind patterns, or that there is poor coverage of the Arctic surface or on declining stratospheric water vapour.
“These are all new hypotheses,” points out McKitrick, “yet the science was supposedly ‘settled’ over a decade ago.”…… SOURCE
Scientist Dr.
Daniel Botkin Tells Congress why he reversed his belief in global warming to
become a skeptic - Prominent
Scientist Dr. Botkin, who has studied climate change for 45 years, told the
Committee in Q&A: 'I have been concerned about global warming since 1968
and in the 1980s, it looked like the weight of evidence lent towards human
induced climate change, to a significant extant, and since then it's moved
against it.' Later in the hearing,
Botkin elaborated: 'I was concerned that there was a human induced climate
warning and I gave talks and TV interviews that said that, but since the middle
of the 1990s, there is evidence that is running against that.
For example the temperature change is not tracking carbon dioxide very well. Then there is the information from the long term antarctic ice core and some from recent paper in the arctic, that suggest that carbon dioxide does not lead temperature change, it may actually lag it significantly or may not lead it at all, and if that is the case that is still an open but important scientific evidence…….SOURCE
For example the temperature change is not tracking carbon dioxide very well. Then there is the information from the long term antarctic ice core and some from recent paper in the arctic, that suggest that carbon dioxide does not lead temperature change, it may actually lag it significantly or may not lead it at all, and if that is the case that is still an open but important scientific evidence…….SOURCE
No comments:
Post a Comment