(Editor's Note: The highlight is mine to emphasize the irrational, misanthropic and morally defective actions of the green movement. The green movement - since the ban on DDT in 1972 - have been responsible for more unnecessary deaths than all the socialist monsters of the twentieth century. That doesn't include the unending health problems that could have been averted or fixed with the use of pesticides and/or GMOs they have stood against, worked to ban or prevented from coming to the market place. That numbers into the billions. RK)
My article this week recaps testimony by four scientist witnesses at the recent House Science Committee hearings on assumptions, policy implications and scientific principles of climate change. It then makes a thought-provoking and I hope compelling case that the supposed “consensus” or “settled” science on “dangerous manmade climate change” is much in dispute and driven by faulty computer models and other major deficiencies.
Most important, that junk science is being used to justify demands that the United States and world eliminate the carbon-based fuels that provide 80% of the energy that makes modern industry, civilization and living standards possible – and that are needed to lift billions more people out of poverty and disease. Those demands require solid, incontrovertible evidence that climate alarmists are right. There is no such evidence.
Thank you for posting my article below, quoting from it, and forwarding it to your friends and colleagues.