When the raw data is used, there is little if any
evidence of global warming and some evidence of global cooling. However, once
the data has been adjusted - ie fabricated by computer models - 20th century
'global warming' suddenly looks much more dramatic.
The fact that supposedly reputable scientists can make
these dishonest adjustments and get away with it is, notes long-time sceptic
Christopher Booker, one of the more remarkable anomalies of the great climate
change scam.
When I first began examining the global-warming scare, I found nothing
more puzzling than the way officially approved scientists kept on being shown
to have finagled their data, as in that ludicrous “hockey stick” graph,
pretending to prove that the world had suddenly become much hotter than at any
time in 1,000 years. Any theory needing to rely so consistently on fudging the
evidence, I concluded, must be looked on not as science at all, but as simply a
rather alarming case study in the aberrations of group psychology.
To Read More...
The physics of thermalization explain why CO2 change has no significant effect on average global temperature.
ReplyDeleteTwo natural drivers have been identified that do explain measured average global temperatures since before 1900 with R^2>0.9 (95% correlation) and credible values back to 1610. Global Warming ended before 2001. The current trend is down.
The method, equation, data sources, history (hind cast to 1610) and predictions (to 2037) are provided at http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com and references.