ByKevin D.
Williamson September 24, 2014
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, having decided
for some inexplicable reason to do a long interview with a fashion magazine
(maybe it is her celebrated collection of lace collars), reaffirmed the most
important things we know about her: her partisanship, her elevation of politics
over law, and her desire to see as many poor children killed as is feasibly
possible.
Speaking about such modest restrictions on abortion as
have been enacted over the past several years, Justice Ginsburg lamented that
“the impact of all these restrictions is on poor women.” Then she added: “It
makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people.”
This is not her first time weighing in on the question
of what by any intellectually honest standard must be described as eugenics. In
an earlier interview, she described the Roe v. Wade decision as being
intended to control population growth, “particularly growth in populations that
we don’t want to have too many of.” She was correct in her assessment of Roe;
the co-counsel in that case, Ron Weddington, would later advise President Bill
Clinton: “You can start immediately to eliminate the barely educated,
unhealthy, and poor segment of our country,” by making abortifacients cheap and
universally available. “It’s what we all know is true, but we only whisper it.”......
To Read More......
My Take - This article appeared this last September. I hope he will repeat and expand on it whenever she retires or that day comes when she makes the world a safer and better place to live. And that day comes to all of us, but most of us will be remembered far more kindly by history than the legacy left by Ginsburg and her fellow promoters of infanticide. They will always be tainted with the stench of murder.
No comments:
Post a Comment