Editor's Note: Alan Caruba has announced that as of 2/5/15 8:41 PM his blog, "Warning Signs" , passed the FOUR MILLION page viewer mark. Warning signs commentaries are read on news and opinion websites daily, and his monthly report is filled with news about a wide range of books. Please enjoy his latest commentaries.
By Alan Caruba Thursday, February 4, 2015
“In short, climate change is not worse than we thought,” wrote Bjorn
Lomborg in a recent issue of The Wall Street
Journal. He is best known as the author of “The Skeptical
Environmentalist” and his skepticism is welcome, but insufficient.
First of all, climate change is a very long-term process and always has
been. The climate takes decades and centuries to change, largely based on
well-known warming and cooling cycles. During the course of these cycles, both
related to comparable cycles on the Sun, all manner of climate-related events
occur, from hurricanes to blizzards. Nothing new here.
The problem with Lomborg’s commentary is that he confuses climate change
with global warming, the hoax concocted in the late 1980s by the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in order to have an
international tax imposed on “greenhouse gas emissions”, primarily carbon
dioxide (CO2), that the IPCC guaranteed was going to heat up the Earth in a few
decades unless greatly reduced. Lomborg even cites the IPCC which has grown
notorious for its lies.
The predictions
about when the heat would become lethal ranged from ten to fifty years as the
amount of CO2 increased. The problem for Lomborg and others is that CO2 has
been increasing in the Earth’s atmosphere without any evidence of the predicted
heating. That explains why Lomborg and other “Warmists” don’t refer to global
warming anymore. As for the increase, the latest, best science points to the
fact that CO2 has no affect whatever on the climate…….To Read More....
By Alan Caruba Wednesday, February 4, 2015
You know something
is terribly wrong when three former Secretaries of State, Henry Kissinger,
George Schultz and Madeleine Albright tell a Senate Armed Services Committee
that the President of the United States is an idiot with no idea how to conduct
foreign affairs. Well, they didn’t say it in those words, but that was pretty
much the message. That was January 29.
Two days earlier
retired 4-Star General James Matthis, former head of U.S. Central Command,
former Army Vice Chief of Staff and 4-Star General Jack Keane, and Navy Admiral
William Fallon, also a former CentCom chief, had also testified before the
Committee. They had a similar message as the diplomats. Obama and the other
idiots in the White House are completely clueless regarding the threat of
radical Islam in general and a potential nuclear Iran in particular.
This is, after all,
a White House that is trying to call those intent on taking over the entire
Middle East and, after that, the rest of the world anything other than “terrorists.”
They have used terms such as “insurgents”, “activists” and “militants.” Here at
home, they are still referring to the killings at Fort Hood as “workplace
violence.” Don’t any of these idiots understand that the terrorists, whether
they call themselves al Qaeda or the Islamic State, Hezbollah, Hamas or any
other name all constitute the same threat?
That’s what the
generals addressed. They told the Senate committee that absence of a White
House strategy makes the ISIS, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan wars “unwinnable.” I
have been around since the end of World War II and that stretch of U.S. history
is one in which we fought to a stalemate in Korea and a loss in Vietnam. After
we won the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama pulled out and now they are
lost too. There was a time when Americans and their leaders knew how to win
wars…..To Read More.....
By
Alan Caruba Tuesday, February 3, 2015
I never fail to be
astonished by the amount of corruption there is in the world. It is a very
human trait whether it was royalty asserting that they ruled by God’s choice
until their subjects rose up against them or modern day despots encountering
the same fate.
Sarah Chayes has
authored “Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security” ($26.95,
W.W. Norton) and it is quite timely when you consider that corruption ignited
the “Arab Spring”, first in Tunisia when a peddler grew so tired of the police
asking for bribes that he set himself afire in protest. Its dictator’s wife
openly displayed the nation’s stolen wealth for which they were driven from
power. In Egypt there was a similar response when the public tired of the
looting of the state treasury by Mubarak’s son. Revolts from Libya to Syria
have been generated by the same cause.
Corruption in the
Middle East has a long history, but it is worldwide and, depending on the
nation, is either tolerated as part of the way the culture does business or
resisted by governments who understand that it undermines their legitimacy.
Throw a dart at the map of the world and you are likely to hit a nation where
corruption is influencing current events. As Chayes notes, “Time and again U.S.
officials are blindsided by major developments in countries where they work.
Too often they are insensible to the perspectives and aspirations of
population.”……To Read More.....
No comments:
Post a Comment