Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Cartoon Roundup: No One is Above the Law

Democrats New Six Forbidden Words: No one is above the law

 By Rich Kozlovich

 

I keep reading all this analysis over Trump’s demand for justice, many calling it revenge, retribution, etc, but the fact is he was charged with crimes he didn’t commit. Whereas he’s demanding these people face justice for crimes they did commit.

It really is that simple.

If he’s outraged by these corrupt Deep Staters, or weak gutless prosecutors, for not going after them with passionate and dynamic diligence, then that outrage is justified, and they need to be fired.

If these people aren’t jailed for the crimes they’ve actually committed then this corruption becomes even more cancerous than it already is.

 They’ve demonstrated they believe they’re above the law with their smug and arrogant interviews over the last six months, and now they’re whining as they realize the boom really is going to fall, and are discovering ….it really is true…… no one is above the law. Which no Democrat has uttered since Trump was elected, yet words that were boomed across America by the left and their myrmidons in the media for four years.

But now…. they’re going to find out…. that’s really true.  Aw, c'mon man, can't we just get along and move on?   Nah, they sowed the wind and now they'll reap the whirlwind.  

It's not about revenge, it's about justice, and justice will be served when these people end up in prison.  What will be interesting to hear will be the next most important words a Democrat utters. 

I will squeal for a deal!  

Because we now know Obama was ‘up to his neck’ in the RussiaGate scandal, along with Hillary and the rest.   Will Comey and others willingly choose protect the real culprits behind all this  corruption?  Criminals who will be living the high life while they're languishing in prison? We'll see!

 

There's corrupt, and then there's just stupid.   

UK Law Officers: "Just Following Orders"

“In a country (Britain) where pedophiles escape sentencing, where knife crime is out of control, where women are assaulted and harassed every time they gather to speak, the state has mobilized five armed officers to arrest a comedy writer.” —Graeme Linehan, British comedian arrested for an anti-trans tweet

By Robin Itzler 

Editor's Note:  This is a commentary in Robin's weekly newsletter Patriot Neighbors.  Any cartoons will have been added by me. If you wish to get the full edition, E-mail her at PatriotNeighbors@yahoo.com to get on her list, it's free. RK 

 

 

Conservatives support law and order as that is the only way society keeps from dissolving into chaos. But what if law and order IS the chaos? We are watching it happen “across the pond” in Britain and other European countries. However, Britain usually gets more of our focus because of America’s unique relationship with the country.

The British people are mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. The red and white St. George’s Cross and Union Jack flags are proudly being carried at protests and flown from homes to show national pride and a disgust with the government’s pro-immigration stance. Following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, it was reported that up to THREE MILLION+ Britons rallied in London to protest losing their nation to Muslim extremists as well as in Kirk’s memory.

Yet, at many British rallies, police come down against their fellow British citizens who are chanting pro-British slogans and waving Union Jacks to save their nation from becoming a third-world country. (Some say it might be too late.) Aren’t those law enforcement officers proud to be British? Don’t those officers want to save their country from looming disaster caused by spiraling legal and illegal Middle-East immigration? Guess not, because the bobbies were just following orders when they arrested fellow Britons. Why weren’t those bobbies joining with the British people who are trying to save their country? Pictured: A migrant hotel protest organizer in Epping, England is arrested trying to fly Union Jack flag at a rally.

Just as law enforcement officers in America’s blue cities and states are just following orders when they arrest Americans waving the Stars and Stripes at anti-illegal immigration events. Why aren’t those police officers joining with Patriots who are trying to save our country?

History is littered with supposed good people who were “just following orders.” We witnessed law enforcement “just following orders” many times during the recent past: 

  • During COVID law enforcement in blue cities and states were just following orders when they arrested Americans who were out alone walking without a mask, or surfing alone in the ocean by an empty beach, or refusing to walk in a certain direction in the supermarket. Knowing COVID mandates went against the U.S. Constitution, why didn’t these police officers refuse to carry out insane orders against their fellow citizens?
  • During the Biden administration Border Patrol Agents were just following orders when they idly stood by as illegal aliens waltzed into the United States. Knowing that illegal invaders entering America unvetted violated the U.S. Constitution, why didn’t border patrol agents refuse to act as illegal alien babysitters?

Throughout history, nations have been destroyed because too many people were just following orders. There is optimism! Citizens in western nations across the globe are peacefully protesting and demanding that the influx of Muslim (legal and illegal) immigrants STOP! The country they are trying to save is their own.  

Media Balance Newsletter for September 29, 2025


Free... Twice-a-Month...What you won't find in one place, anywhere else.

By John Droz, Jr 

Enjoy the latest edition of our free, critically thinking Media Balance Newsletter, and the picture in this edition says volumes.  So much for "toxic" masculinity.   

We cover Climate to COVID, Elections to Education, Renewables to Religion — showing you what the lamestream media has revised or filtered out.  If you missed it, here is the prior Newsletter.

 Please use these links to pass on the Newsletter to other open-minded citizens via social media, etc. Anyone can subscribe (or unsubscribe) by emailing me. (aaprjohn@northnet.org)

We are continuously working at making this twice-a-month publication more interesting, more useful and more accessible to our 20,000± readers. 

Due to loyal supporters, the Newsletter has been published 16 years now — thank you! Please let me know the email of anyone you feel would appreciate getting this unique and powerful information. 

PS — My substack site is now quite popular! It's about the lack of Critical Thinking relating to numerous societal matters (education, climate, energy, etc.). If you haven't already, signup for a FREE subscription. Enjoy and pass it on!

 Copyright © 2025; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.orgElection-Integrity.info & C19Science.info)

Place Your Bet On The Future Of Energy: U.S. Or China

September 28, 2025, Francis Menton @ Manhattan Contrarian

The first eight months of the second Trump administration have seen a sea change in energy policy. Previously, under Biden, the federal government had undertaken a blowout of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies and incentives for so-called “renewable” energy sources, while simultaneously implementing dozens of regulations and restrictions to suppress the production and use of fossil fuels. President Trump has now reversed all of that.

However, please take note of an important distinction: although Trump and Congress have zeroed out nearly all subsidies and tax credits for wind and solar generation and for grid-scale batteries, they have not enacted comparable subsidies and incentives for fossil fuels. Instead, all sources of energy production now must stand or fall without subsidies, based on their ability to fulfill customer demand and to generate profit. All sources of energy are now on equal footing, and without subsidies.

Meanwhile, over in China, billions of dollars in subsidies have flowed for many years into developing the ability to produce the infrastructure for a wind/solar/storage energy system — things like polysilicon, solar panels, solar cells, wind turbine blades, wind turbine nacelles, and battery cells. As a result, China has become completely dominant in the world in manufacturing these and many related items.

So who is making the better energy bet?

For one possible answer to that question, here is a Wall Street Journal piece from September 21 (probably behind pay wall). You get a clear idea where they are going from the headline, “The U.S. Is Forfeiting the Clean-Energy Race to China.”

In the vision of the authors of the piece (David Uberti, Ed Ballard, and Brian Spengele), there is an international race under way for dominance in “clean energy,” and the United States is in the process of losing it. The problem is that the U.S. is failing to put up the necessary government subsidies for “clean energy” to vie for the lead. Excerpt:

U.S. and China are offering competing visions for the future of energy, representing the next dimension in the showdown between two superpowers vying for global influence and artificial intelligence supremacy. The U.S. renewables retreat goes far beyond the tax bill that is winding down more than $400 billion in estimated subsidies. Federal agencies have tightened rules for new development. The Trump administration recently terminated a multibillion-dollar loan guarantee for a Midwest transmission line, halted a near-complete wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island and canceled $3.7 billion of funding for technologies that could reduce industrial emissions.

China, meanwhile, under the enlightened direction of President Xi, has opened the money spigot to subsidize “green energy” development:

In a meeting with his economic team in 2014, Chinese leader Xi Jinping called for a “revolution” in the nation’s energy system. Renewables were earmarked for special state support as part of Xi’s “Made in China 2025” initiative. By owning the production chain for equipment such as photovoltaic panels and wind turbines, the government bet it could ease its energy-security challenge while creating jobs.

And the result of the massive subsidies? Innovation! 

Even as Chinese companies continued to erect coal plants, billions of dollars of subsidies flowed to such companies as JinkoSolar and the battery maker Contemporary Amperex Technology, also known as CATL. Innovation followed.

So China is racing ahead to dominate the entire clean energy field:

By 2023, a solar module produced in China was 65% cheaper than one made in the U.S., according to the energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie. CATL said it spent more than $2.6 billion on research and development last year alone, with a staff of more than 20,000 people. Caroline Wang, an analyst with the Australian think tank Climate Energy Finance, said the resulting renewables buildout has recently left China’s world-leading coal fleet running at less than half capacity.  “They are just leading the world by an absolutely mind-boggling margin,” Wang said.

It’s mind-boggling! The Journal provides the following chart (sourced to Bloomberg/NEF) of market shares of various green energy components to illustrate how completely dominant China has become: 

 

Wow! There’s not one of those critical components where China’s 2024 market share was less than about 65%. And for some of them, like solar wafers and battery anodes, the market share was more like 95%.

So how are you going to bet? Here’s my bet: The entire idea of an energy system based on wind, solar and batteries will not work and will fail, probably over the course of the next ten years or so, if not sooner. All of the investment will be lost. All of the employees will be laid off.

At least in the U.S. we allow companies to fail and go through prompt bankruptcies, where their assets get re-allocated to more productive uses. In China, where avoiding loss of face for the leaders is the highest value, failed businesses get propped up endlessly, dragging the economy down with them. I guess that we are just blessed with incompetent geopolitical adversaries.

Of course, I could be wrong. But I don’t think this one is a close call. Businesses that need government subsidies to survive are a negative for the economy. It’s as simple as that.

UN, EU, ICJ, Climate Cabal want to keep world’s poor impoverished

They proclaim a ‘human right’ to ‘clean environment’ but not to reliable energy or better health  

By Paul Driessen

On the evening of September 30, 1882, Henry Rogers turned a switch and the Hearthstone Historic House living room in Appleton, Wisconsin (my mother’s hometown) was bathed in a soft amber glow. Hearthstone became the first home in the world lit by electricity.

Today, few can imagine our lives without plentiful, reliable, affordable electricity – for lights, computers, washers, driers, dishwashers, heating, air conditioning, television, vehicles, hospitals, schools, factories, data centers, artificial intelligence and more, to light, improve and sustain our lives. 

And yet nearly 750 million people still have no access to electricity. Billions more have minimal, sporadic access. The vast majority live in Sub-Saharan Africa: 600 million with no electricity; hundreds of millions more with minimal or sporadic power. Many Asians and Latin Americans are similarly deprived. Often, electrification rates are high in cities but extremely low in the countrysides.

Incredibly, across much of Europe, millions of poor and middle-class families are also deprived. Many simply cannot afford electricity prices that have skyrocketed in the wake of coal, gas and nuclear power plant closures, in favor of wind and solar installations.

Other Europeans no longer have jobs, because factories and entire industries cannot afford those prices, closed down and sent their jobs to China and other coal-based-electricity nations. Still others are being told by climate-obsessed pressure group, media and political elites to light, heat and cool only one room, wear more sweaters, and appreciate electricity when it’s available, not gripe about its cost or absence.

Europe refuses to frack for oil and gas … but imports Russian fuels, thereby sustaining Putin’s war on Ukraine’s citizens and civilian infrastructure.

Several US states have also imposed Euro-style electricity rates, rolling or recurring blackouts, and economic disruption in the name of saving the planet from climate calamities.

Leading, applauding and demanding this insanity are the United Nations, European Union, International Court of Justice (ICJ), multilateral anti-development banks, non-governmental organizations and even the now-defunct USAID. They harp about climate emergencies, demand that countries switch to “clean” energy, and refuse to approve or finance fossil fuel projects even for Africa.

The ICJ recently asserted that people have a “human right” to a “clean, healthy, sustainable environment” – which to the court means no impacts from fossil-fuel-driven climate change. It said nothing about rights to reliable and affordable energy, modern healthcare or decent living standards.

These proclamations and policies carry serious and often lethal consequences, especially for the world’s poorest people. They excuse and justify policies that effectively keep families and nations mired in poverty, squalor, joblessness, disease and malnutrition.

President Trump has excoriated the UN for its “brutal” climate and Net Zero policies. The rest of the world should do likewise.

The ICJ-defined right to a clean, healthy, sustainable environment also ignores the reality that “clean energy” requires extensive mining and minerals processing, using fossil fuels and resulting in extensive toxic land, air and water pollution. Much of this dirty work is done in the poor families’ own backyards (because the elites want no mining or processing in their fiefdoms), and much of it involves child and slave labor, no or substandard workplace safety rules, and rampant land and habitat desecration.

The subsequent wind, solar and transmission installations impact hundreds of times more crop, habitat and scenic lands than coal or gas power plants that generate electricity in far greater quantities, far more reliably, far less expensively.

In India’s Thar Desert, next to Pakistan, native species are being sacrificed on the climate crisis and clean energy altar. Solar panels already blanket over 200 square miles; more than 2.5 million trees have been cut down to install them; and another 14,000 square miles of habitat (almost equal to Switzerland or half of South Carolina) could be clear cut for more panels, Vijay Jayaraj reports.

Even ponds that once attracted pelicans and a dozen other species are covered with solar panels. Numerous other wild species are also struggling to survive as their habitats are destroyed. Cleaning and cooling the panels already requires the equivalent of 300,000 people’s drinking water needs every week.

This destruction is happening all over the world. The ICJ still insists wind and solar power foster “clean, healthy, sustainable, climate friendly” economies – and ignores the privation it perpetuates.

The limited, intermittent, unpredictable electricity from Climate Cabal-approved generators guarantees that the world’s still-impoverished people will never have the appliances we take for granted. They may eventually have cell phones and laptops, a few lights, dorm-room refrigerators, and jobs maintaining “renewable” power systems.

However, they will never enjoy the modern healthcare, homes and living standards that require 24/7/365 coal, gas, nuclear or hydroelectric power.

So before we let Net Zero fanatics in the Climate Industrial Complex inflict their lies, ideologies and policies on people who’ve never had an opportunity to enjoy – much less reject – the marvels of modern civilization, let’s ask those prospective victims if they’re okay with that version of a “clean, sustainable” future. With giving up their aspirations for the lives and wonders they see in movies and magazines.

Let’s find out whether they’ve had a chance to speak with their European counterparts, and inquire about how Europe’s automotive, glass, pharmaceutical and other industries are faring. How many workers still have jobs. How many companies have moved their operations to China, India or other faraway locales. How much they enjoy living under the costs and restrictions imposed by EU politicians and bureaucrats.

Eastern Europeans weren’t overjoyed to exchange six years under the Nazis for 50 years under the benevolent people’s republics of the Soviet Union. Poor families in Africa, Asia and Latin America might not equally unexcited about the prospect of swapping their current daily grinds for the minimally better lives envisioned for them by would-be global ruling elites.

Perhaps they will no longer have to live in mud-and-thatch huts, carry water from distant wells, cook over wood and dung fires that infect women and babies with lung diseases, get intestinal diseases from parasite-infected water and spoiled food, suffer from malaria and other insect-borne diseases, be treated in antiquated hospitals that don’t even have window screens, and die decades before they should.

But how much better will their lives be under policies imposed by elites who decide their fates after flying private jets from one of their mansions to the next 5-star UN-sanctioned climate or economic conference?

The world’s poor don’t just have a human right to truly clean, healthy, sustainable environments. They have a right to enjoy the benefits of affordable 24/7 electricity, well-paid jobs, and all the modern appliances, healthcare, homes, prosperity and 6,000+ products made from petrochemicals that most people in industrialized nations already enjoy.

And do so without being guilted and conned by phony claims that aspiring to such energy and lives will bring worsening storms and inundations from rising seas, more forest fires, stressed blood supplies and other catastrophes conjured up by climate grifters and their political, academic and media allies.

Poor and developing nations need to band together, finance their own energy infrastructure, development, health and prosperity – and tell the carbon colonialists to take a hike.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power - Black Death, and other books and articles on energy, climate change, economic development and human rights.

Friday, September 26, 2025

P&D and The Week That Was

Truth is the Sublime Convergence of History and Reality

De Omnibus Dubitandum, (Everything is to be questioned!)

This Link will take you to My Commentaries.
By Rich Kozlovich
 
 
 
I know it's only Friday and I normally post this on Saturday, but, it's Window's 11 time, and my computer can't run Windows 11, so, today I'm shutting down and getting a new computer installed with Windows 11.  I will be taking it in to  have my computer guy transfer all the information into the new one.  I will be up and running by Tuesday, and I'm going to love the break.   
 
In today's edition I have five pieces of my own, with one video by Victor Davis Hanson, and eighteen pieces by others.  I would really like to draw your attention to Joe Friedman's article on how Democrats make up rules and disobey court orders in order to hide the evidence of voter fraud during the 2020 election.  Again, Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election.  
 
Break out the popcorn, it's gonna be interesting to watch the outcome of the Comey indictment, and make no mistake, Obama is up to his neck in the Russiagate scandal.  Will Comey try to deal and sell out his co-conspirators?  We'll see.   
 
BLOW ME DOWN - POPEYE – Zazoo Fine Art Gallery
As for my usual monologue which would appear here,....well...., Popeye and I have a lot in common, "I've had all I can stands, I can't stands no more!"
 
Best wishes, and have a great weekend.
 
Rich 
 
 
 My Commentaries
Free North Star Clipart, Download Free North Star Clipart ...
Constant as the North Star

Democrats Defy Court Order

Contempt results in a $10,000 penalty — PER DAY!

By Joe Fried CPA Sep 25, 2025 @ Joe Fried CPA Election Central 

Democrats are defying Georgia law and a standing court order.

Like Nancy Pelosi, who refused to seat Reps. Jim Jordan and Jim Banks on the January 6th committee, Fulton County Democrats are refusing to seat two Republicans on the Fulton County Elections Board. This lawless action is in direct violation of a Fulton election ordinance:

Two members shall be appointed by the governing authority of Fulton County from nominations made by the chairperson of the county executive committee of the political party whose candidates received the second largest number of such votes [14-33].

Under this legal standard, the Republican Party is entitled to nominate two members to serve on the Board. The two candidates, nominated by the GOP several months ago, are Julie Adams and Jason Frazier. They have yet to be seated.

This issue has been adjudicated in a courtroom, and the Democrats were found guilty of violating election law. On August 3, Superior Court Judge David Emerson ruled that Fulton County is required to seat the two Republican nominees. Because they refused, Judge Emerson ruled (August 27) that the Fulton County Board of Commissioners was in contempt of court, and was required to pay $10,000 per day until the two Republicans are seated. In the words of Judge Emerson, this matter is clear-cut:

I didn’t see anywhere in that legislation that the commission was given veto power over the nominees. Is it in there, did I miss it?

A few days later the Judge temporarily stayed the penalty because Democrats claim they will file an appeal. If they do, that appeal will fail. The absurd rationalization of the Democrats

Fulton County Democrats have justified their lawbreaking with this argument: Adams and Frazier are “election deniers.” Democrats are upset with nominee Julie Adams because she did not vote to certify the 2020 election when she previously was on the Board. In the case of Jason Frazier, his sin was challenging (successfully) many ineligible voter registrations. There are two problems with the Democrat argument:

Being a so-called election denier, even if true, is totally irrelevant to the law. The GOP has a right to have its nominees seated.

Adams and Frazier were, in fact, not election deniers. Indeed, their criticisms were understated. In my opinion, the 2020 election should not have been certified, and the Fulton County administration should have been investigated for fraud.

An analysis of the facts shows that the Democrat obstructionists are simply “truth deniers.” 

Joe Biden did not win the 2020 Georgia election

1. To this day, ultra blue Fulton Co. has provided zero support for 17,852 of its 2020 election ballots. Perhaps it can’t. Prominent Berkeley statistician Philip B. Stark examined Fulton Co. election records in connection with his testimony in a federal lawsuit. According to his sworn declaration (p. 105 of 209), “...of the 527,925 cast vote records: 17,852 image files are missing.” Keep in mind that Biden won (supposedly) by less than 11,800 votes.

2. Between the 2016 and 2020 elections, Georgia experienced the sharpest decline in absentee ballot rejection rates of any state in the country. If the 2016 rejection rate had been applied to the 2020 absentee ballot rate, there would have been 78,000 fewer votes (mostly Democrat votes). Again, Biden’s “victory” margin was less than 11,800.

3. Now consider rejection rates at the county level. Fulton Co. is the largest and most Democrat county in the state. For some very strange reason, its rejection rate was only 1/7th as high as the rest of Georgia. As an experienced CPA and auditor, I performed a statistical analysis of the probability of Fulton Co. being so much lower than the state as a whole, so much lower than other large counties with similar per capita earnings, and so much lower than other counties with similar demographics. No matter how I prepared the analysis, the statistical probability was less than ONE IN ONE BILLION.

4. About 3 years after the election we learned why the Fulton Co. ballot rejection rate was lower than that of the rest of the state: Signatures were never checked. In April, 2024, Mark Wingate, a member of the 2020 Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, made the following statement under oath:

I asked (Fulton Co. election personnel), ‘What did we do for signature verification?’ And the comment I got back frankly floored me, ‘We didn’t do any.’

5. Wingate also identified another major problem: 

“I and other Board members had requested that we obtain the chain of custody documentation from the department and none of that was ever delivered.” The lack of chain of custody might explain how 17,852 ballots magically appeared out of nowhere.

6. Other elements of this illegal election have been identified by VoterGA, an experienced nonprofit watchdog organization staffed with qualified data analysts. Some of those elements (just for Fulton County) are 380,458 missing original in-person ballot images and 512,743 missing SHA files needed to authenticate each ballot (and required by Georgia law). None of those allegations has been refuted.

7. Perhaps the biggest cause for concern is the unyielding refusal of Fulton Co. to permit access to the ballots. In December 2020, 6 witnesses independently testified that many of the absentee ballots appeared to be fake: The ballots were supposedly mailed but had none of the folding creases required in order for the ballots to fit into envelopes. Also, they were on different paper and/or they had suspicious ink that appeared to be toner. As a result, the head of VoterGA, Garland Favorito, filed a lawsuit to obtain ballot access. After nearly 5 years of litigation, the ballots are no longer under court seal and Favorito has a right to inspect the ballots via a standard open records request. Without explanation, however, Fulton Co. refuses to give that access. 

Conclusion

Democrats on the Fulton County Board of Commissioners claim that they can’t comply with a court order to seat nominated Republicans because those Republicans are “election deniers.” That begs the question: What is an “election denier? A good answer was provided by Bridget Thorne, a surviving Republican member on the Fulton County Board of Commissioners. She said this to her Democrat colleagues (video at 13:10):

What is an election denier? Election denier is anyone who wants integrity in our elections. By state law, we need to reconcile that the number of people voted equals the number of ballots cast. We do not obey that law.

My Adventure with Mensa

Critically Thinking about High IQ

John Droz Sep 26, 2025 @ Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues  

I’ve had an interesting — and somewhat revealing — relationship with Mensa and Mensa members. I’m sharing this brief version with you…

Mensa is an international organization of people who have high IQ. To join an individual has to score in the top 2% of a certified IQ test. I had done that and decided to try out the organization.

My hope was that:  

  1. members would be interesting, engaging, critically thinking people
  2. who were actively involved in important societal issues (energy, healthcare, education, etc.), and 
  3.  in creative ways.

So I applied, was accepted, started paying dues, and got their monthly magazine (Mensa Bulletin). I was assigned to the Syracuse, NY chapter.

I was disappointed in the magazine, as I found very few articles to be of interest. It seemed to me that many were vanity pieces about some obscure interest a particular member had. I saw very few that were constructively and creatively addressing societal issues.

I was unable to attend any Mensa Chapter meetings as the closest to me were 100± miles away. I did have a few phone chats with some members in my chapter, but they did not lead to anything productive.

After several months, I decided to take the initiative and sponsor a Mensa party at our lakefront home in the Adirondacks — a premier spot if I say so myself. (See a pix from our driveway, below. We were on a beautiful peninsula and had 465 feet of shoreline on Brantingham Lake, plus a nice boathouse.)

This did strike a chord as over 30 Mensa members showed up (many from a hundred miles away). Although I didn’t know any of them, most of them already knew other members. I arranged several things (boat rides, a great meal, etc.) to get people introduced and to socialize. We had a beautiful, fun Summer day, and the get-together lasted about 6 hours.

Unfortunately, the main reason for my taking a lot of time and trouble to do this did not pan out. I did not find a single person who met the three basic expectations I had (see above) for these highly intelligent people.

A few months later, I decided to stop paying dues, as this was not fruitful.

Some Lessons Learned —

Some of my takeaways from being a Mensa member are that high IQ does not assure that a person:  

  1. is a critical thinker,
  2. has wisdom, 
  3. is interesting,  
  4. is a good communicator, etc., etc.

All in all, I’m glad I tried out this experiment, as (good scientists know this) even failed trials should be illuminating…


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I am now offering incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

I also consider reader submissions on Critical Thinking on my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2025 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time - but why would you?

Leave a comment

Share

Thanks for reading Critically Thinking About Select Societal Issues! Please pass a link to this article on to other associates who might benefit. They can subscribe for FREE to receive new posts (typically about 1-2 times a week).

Great Moments in Supranational Government

To highlight preposterous examples of waste and malfeasance, I have three ongoing series:

Today, I have to create a new category. Because we’re going to cite an absurd example of lunacy by the European Commission. So our new series will be Great Moments in Supranational Governance. It involves Greece and agriculture subsidies, so you can automatically assume spectacular corruption and graft.  And you’d be right. Here are some excerpts from an exposé by Nick Squires for the U.K.-based Telegraph.

 

Greek farmers claimed to be growing bananas on the slopes of snow-covered mountains as part of a massive fraud costing the European Union tens of millions of euros. …The most creative scams included claiming subsidies for phantom flocks of sheep and goats, as well as for non-existent banana plantations on 9,570ft-high Mount Olympus, which is covered in snow for much of the year. …Landowners claimed subsidies for olive groves in a high-security military airport and for pastureland that extended into the sea. … 

Government officials were allegedly complicit in the massive fraud, which has claimed the scalps of four ministers. The motivation appeared to have been securing votes in return for turning a blind eye to, or colluding in, the theft of EU funds. …In some cases, farmers claimed money for land and livestock that they did not own, while other cases involved people with no links to farming cashing in on the EU subsidies. …Police scrutinised more than 6,000 out of 800,000 applications and discovered that hundreds of farmers had misappropriated EU subsidies.

In other words, these amazing but disgusting examples of fraud were uncovered after investigating less than 1/10th of 1 percent of potential cases. So imagine how much more fraud actually exists? And I’m sure that similar types of fraud exist in other European Union nations.

 

Sadly, American taxpayers also get raped and pillaged by agriculture subsidies, with some of the worst examples being sugar (see here and here), milk (see here and here), and corn (see here, here, and here). 

The only country that I know of with a sensible laissez-faire approach is New Zealand. They eliminated all their subsidies decades ago and now have have a thriving industry.

The European Union should do the same thing, as should the United States (meaning the Department of Agriculture should be abolished, as quickly as possible).

Thursday, September 25, 2025

Victor Davis Hanson: Western Civilization Has Reached its Turning Point After Charlie Kirk’s Death

 

P&D Today, and The World as I See It!


History is Everything, and Everything is to be Questioned.

By Rich Kozlovich 

Today's edition is a combination of yesterday and today, as I didn't publish a World as I See It, yesterday.  I have no commentaries of my own except the monologue below.  However, here are five really good pieces to provoke thought. 

  1. "If You Like Your Doctor, You Will Be Able to Keep Your Doctor, Period" By Susan Daniels
  2. Did Anyone Ever Believe Men Could Become Women? By Daniel Greenfield
  3. Amazon and eBay Sell Merch Calling for Trump’s Death  By Daniel Greenfield
  4. Around the World in Five Minutes By Robin Itzler
  5. Part I: Yes, Taxes Change Behavior By Dan Mitchell

 Now, For The World as I See It!

  

On March 3, 2025 I published The Rape of Civilization, with the above cartoon, and Blogger deleted it.  Between January and April they deleted nine posts, all of which I've been protesting ever since.  Before this they reinstated one a couple of months ago, and they've also reinstated this one from March 26, 2025, Islam is Destroying Western Culture: Europe, and now I'm down to five that are still deleted, although the first one is still listed as deleted... go figure.  At any rate....how's that for progress?  And it only took a mere six months.  Imagine that, kinda like government work.  

If you ever wondered if leftism is a mental disorder, try rationalizing this, a trans Muslim Antifa protested outside of Charlie Kirk's funeral, and why would a mentally sane judge let a  Muslim, who slashed a man for blasphemy, walk free?  Then there's the Michigan school board who punished an 11 year old boy who prevented a possible school shooting, in effect America is raising children to be "passive, not principled. We don’t reward bravery; we penalize it. We don’t teach judgment; we outlaw it. And then we wonder why the next generation hesitates when life demands courage."

Six year ago Trump gave a speech at the UN and they laughed at him. He gave a speech at the UN this week excoriating them for their failed open borders "experiments" which is destroying western civilization, trashed them for pushing their global warming hoax, and their green agenda in general, outlined their list of failures, and they're not laughing.  They've learned it's not nice to start a war with Donald Trump, and they now know for sure, we don't need them, we don't care what they think, and we're not going to bail them out any longer, and truth be told, Trump telling them to stick it, along with their lackeys here in America, is exactly what conservative voters wanted said. 

The Mayor of Londonistan Sadiq Khan says ..... watch out now... here is comes.... says "he is racist, he is sexist, he is misogynistic, and he is Islamophobic"!  Wow, imagine that.  I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.  Who could have expected that? 

If there ever was evidence of just how stupid these European leaders are, then the UK's Prime Minister Keir Starmer would be a prime example.  After his far left Labour government decided to recognize a Palestinian state, they demanded $2.7 Trillion in reparations, which they think is a "good place to start", and why not.  When you deal with a "cringing appeaser", why let up, and they won't.  

Talking about lawsuits, here's one that's long overdue.   Students sue 32 universities for inflating tuition.  This is a case of "it seemed like at good idea at the time" when the federal government created the student loan program, which is anwith students owing ten of thousand of dollars, some in the six figures, and many graduating with degrees that will never earn them enough money to pay it back easily, and for some, not at all so they're defaulting on those loans.  

As of the first half of this year over five million borrowers were in default, and another six million are significantly behind on their payments with that number escalating to over ten million by years end.  How did this happen?  First, as soon as these students got their money, the colleges raised prices, way beyond costs or inflation.  Second, they promoted many degrees that were for the most part worthless, all the while claiming these degrees were these students pathway to financial success.  These student loans are defrauding America, and now it's coming home to roost.  

These universities have tax free endowments that are worth billions, and I think it's time those endowments eat the payback of those loans to the federal government though taxation and/or penalties.   If it's fraud on the part of the colleges, and I think it is, that's a crime.  

Russia is playing chicken with NATO with their overflights into NATO controlled air space, seemingly as a show of strength and intimidation.  It's neither.  Poland and other NATO countries are now militarizing up against Russia, and these overflights aren't a show of strength, it shows weakness and panic, in hopes of getting a better negotiating position.  That's lost now, Trump who thought he had a great relationship with Putin, and was catering to him, has learned Putin is Russian, and nothing he says can be trusted.  He should have asked me, I could see what he was doing. That's been the trend with Russian leadership from Stalin onward.  Now, Trump's really ticked off at him, and while I never thought I would say this, Ukraine may now win this war and take back all the territory Russia has confiscated, and possibly even the Crimea.  

Russia's economy is in deep trouble.  Their demographic pyramid is a mess, he can't man his military or his industry so he's importing men from N. Korean and China to fill in his military ranks, and he's still being decimated.  He's importing people from Central Asia and the Middle East to meet his industrial manpower needs, which is a poison demographic and cultural pill that will come back to haunt them.... and in the near future.

Ukraine is now equipped with smart missiles that are striking deep inside Russia, specifically targeting Russian oil and energy installations, and it appears the west, including Trump, is going to support Ukraine now more fully.    As I see it Russia's only way out of this mess is for Putin to be overthrown and replaced with an entirely new power structure that walks away from this mess, as the Soviets did during WWI against Germany, putting the entire blame on Putin and his cabal, and then putting them on public trial, finding them guilty, and ultimately executing him for wasting the lives of hundreds of thousands of young Russian men, and destroying hundreds of thousands more.   Failed leaders don't fare well in Russia.  

One final thought.  Zohran Mamdani wants to spend a mere $100 million dollars on increased services for illegal aliens.  And while polls show he's a shoo in to be elected and has been anointed by the left and the media, I think polls are a lot of horsepucky.  

Does it occur to anyone not many New York Democrats voted in the primaries?  And when you look at NYC demographics I think we might find there's not as much support for him as is being touted.  

Of course you can't beat someone with no one, among the three running against him there are two defrocked "stupid and incompetent" Democrats and a Republican wth the party pretty much sitting on its hands, which pretty much eliminates Curtis Sliwa.  However,  as stupid and incompetent as Cuomo and Adams have been,  NYC just might decide a "stupid and incompetent" Cuomo or Adams is better than a "disaster and treason" Mamdani. 

Have a good day! 


Life is About Patterns and Circles. Patterns of behavior,
and the Social Circles Promoting That Behavior 
 


Around the World in Five Minutes

By Robin Itzler

Editor's Note:  This is a commentary in Robin's weekly newsletter Patriot Neighbors.  Any cartoons will have been added by me. If you wish to get the full edition, E-mail her at PatriotNeighbors@yahoo.com to get on her list, it's free. RK 

 

From around the Nation:

The midterm elections are already so heated it's hard to believe they're not until November of 2026, and not November of 2025.   Given the insane things Democrats are saying one has to wonder what the future of the Democrat party is when the leading potential Democrat candidates for the 2028 Presidential election are Kamala Harris, AOC, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, California Governor Gavin Newsom, and a number of others, all of whom are now pro-crime and pro-illegal immigration, anti-science candidates, and all the Democrat candidates for the Congress support their positions in lockstep.   A power hungry party that shows it's unfit to run a constitutional republic.

They've lost in a big way the solid Democrat base that was the backbone of the Democrat party for decades, blue collar workers, minorities, and especially the most dedicated Democrats of them all, Jews.  Many of which are abandoning the Democrat party either becoming Republicans, Independents, or simply not Democrats.

Arizona Gubernatorial Race If you believe that in 2022 Arizona Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs narrowly defeated Republican Kari Lake 50.3 percent to 49.7 percent, we’d like to sell you a vacation home at the Ukraine/Russia border. Looking ahead to 2026, currently there are two Republicans vying to run against the docile Hobbs: U.S. House Representative Andy Biggs and attorney and former member of the Arizona Board of Regents Karrin Taylor Robson. BOTH Republicans have been endorsed by President Trump. 

But wait, there’s more! U.S. House Representative David Schweikert is considering a run for Arizona governor. Keep your popcorn handy!

Minnesota : Those who think Tim “China” Walz would have made a great vice president, will be pleased that he is going to run for a third term as governor. (Insert barf bag here.) Walz is rumored to be considering a presidential run in 2028. (Sorry, out of barf bags.) Walz is a lunatic. Our main complaint is that he uses his dog Scout in campaign promos.

Tennessee: Unlike the mentally challenged Democrat governors, Republican Governor Bill Lee welcomes the federal government’s help in reducing crime in one of his cities. In this case, Democrat controlled Memphis. The “Memphis SAFE Task Force," is a multi-agency effort to help make the city livable again. 

Events from around the globe

United Nations: It shouldn’t surprise anyone that 141 members of the antisemitic, anti-America United Nations’ General Assembly voted to destroy Israel. Officially, it was a vote to support a suicidal two-state solution. How many of these governments would want Hamas and Hezbollah living next to them? Hmmm, when else has the word “solution” been used with regards to Jews? Let’s open our history books, shall we? The Nazis also had a “solution” to an issue affecting Jews. The 10 nations that voted no are: - Argentina - Palau - Hungary - Papua New Guinea - Israel - Paraguay - Micronesia - Tonga - Nauru - United States

Britain: The weekend following Charlie Kirk’s assassination, there were rallies throughout the world—to celebrate Kirk’s life and demand freedom. Thousands of people came out in London, some outlets reporting close to one million. Proudly carrying their flags they demanded that the leftist government make Great Britain Great Again.

In Britain, the Kirk rally and many others are under the theme of “Unite the Kingdom.” Led by Tommy Robinson, the British people are mad as hell and not going to take it anymore with attacks on free speech and putting out welcome mats for Middle Eastern immigrants who do not want to assimilate. This is happening in a nation whose Secretary of State for the Home Department is Shabana Mahmood.

Demonstrators carried the Union flag and the red and white St George’s Cross of England, while others waved United States and Israel flags. There were also signs, hats and flags for our MAGA movement.

The voting age in Britain is now sixteen.  Sixteen-year-olds living in the United Kingdom cannot legally drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes or drive a car. But they will be able to help elect the next British prime minister after the country lowered its voting age from 18 to 16.

It will bring England and Northern Ireland in line with Scotland and Wales, where 16-year-olds can already vote in devolved national elections. The change is due to take effect by the next general election, which is expected by 2029. There won’t be much of a United Kingdom left if they keep their current awful liberal prime minister Keir Starmer until then.

Did Anyone Ever Believe Men Could Become Women?

By Daniel Greenfield@ Sultan Knish Blog

Did anyone ever really believe that men could become women? ‘Tipping Point’ author Malcolm Gladwell helped answer that question when he recently apologized for publicly asserting that men could change sex and fairly compete against women in sports because he was “cowed”.

No one bothered to follow up with the more interesting question, ‘What is Malcolm still too cowed to say in public’? It’s a question that also ought to be addressed to the various public figures, politicians, intellectuals and talkers, who have recanted the transgender heresy.

We know that they claimed to believe in one obviously wrong thing because of some combination of social pressure, manufactured consensus and intellectual incoherence.

What else do they hypocritically assert in public while privately doubting?

The intellectual crisis that led to Gladwell publicly asserting something that a small child, never mind a respected thinker, knew was wrong has its roots in the dual collapse of the western mind. Every preexisting moral and rational system, whether the Judeo-Christian ethos or the scientific method, is being dismantled as reactionary and is in the process of being replaced with the moral imperative of a revolutionary power shift from the oppressed to the oppressors.

This permanent state of moral emergency may not be questioned and its specific assertions are not subject to any of the religious or rational tests that once provided people with a consistent worldview based around clear principles rather than hysterical assertions that the crisis of the moment, ‘trans kids’, global warming, police shootings, Gaza or any of a grab bag of causes, is too grave to subject it to the rules of evidence in a search for the actual truth.

The Left claims that its various ideological flavors are rational and scientific, but they are nothing of the kind, instead they use ideology to pick and choose their science. That was why the Soviet Union could champion Lysenkoism and lock up actual scientists because the pseudoscience fit the Communist conception of how life should work. Not how it did work.

That is why skeptics are right to question environmentalist claims of human industry causing planetary destruction for matching all too closely with traditional leftist anti-capitalism, its luddite obsessions and the romanticization of the pre-industrial countryside, no matter how many PhDs assert that they represent expert opinion that just happens to match their politics.

The bizarre notion that men could become women by identifying as women fit a ‘Lysenkoist’ notion of human plasticity. There was and is nothing scientific to the entire thing. Doctors and researchers have brushed away past subjective claims of patient experiences with various medical conditions, even when those claims were later substantiated, chose to entirely discard basic biology here not because of any new data, but because ideology demanded it.

The transgender case rested on nothing more than special pleading, on long since discredited claims that ‘validating’ delusions about gender spectrums prevented suicides (and where else are doctors willing to prop up patient delusions, let alone perform highly risky unnecessary cosmetic procedures to validate those feelings) and its assertions about men being born with ‘female brains’ were the subject of feverish fantasies in online fetish groups, not research.

The ‘science’ of the transgender case lay not in its assertion of the positive, that men could become women, but in the negative, in its radical destruction of what (as part of this process) it dubbed the gender binary. The Left never really proves its points, rather it uses conspirational agitation, turning that which it seeks to destroy into a strawman, picks out-of-context pieces of information to poke holes in it, asserts conspiracy theories in which the strawman represents a broader systemic form of oppression and then politicizes the debate into a binary choice between supporting the victims or being one of the oppressors. That is what sucked Gladwell in and so many others liberals who fear being ‘on the wrong side of history’ more than a big lie.

Intellectuals and public figures who fell for an ideological case rather than a factual one and who confused ethics and morality with the tenets of leftist ideology rationalized the unreasonable and now that the case has collapsed have to rationalize why they did it.

Did anyone really believe that men could become women? It’s the same question as whether anyone really believed that redistribution of wealth by a centralized government could make society fair. They may not have believed that it was really true, but they believed that it was right. That is the tribute that liberals pay to leftists, agreeing to see the world not as it is, but as it can be made to be, and confusing their monstrous totalitarian delusions with idealism.

Modern liberals (rather than classical liberals) and leftists both share a belief in the overwhelming power of social transformation to make society ideal. The liberal border line used to be that the transformation had to be voluntary, rational and based on the realities of human nature. On the other side you had Marxism with its morass of conspiracy theories, hypothetical economics, tyrannical bureaucracies and grad student power fantasies. Liberals could accept socialism as long as its implementation was plausible and appeared to be voluntary.

The border line is long gone. As is for the most part any distinct liberal identity. The Democrats, a party of which liberals were once a fringe, base their plans for total social transformation on the same conspiracy theories, fantasy economics and power grabs that characterized Marxists. The only way such nonsense can hold up is with total ideological conformity. Shutting up opponents, whether timid liberals like Gladwell or vocal conservatives like Charlie Kirk, is the only way that any of what now passes for liberalism can continue to control the discourse.

Believing in a dozen impossible ideological things before breakfast is not a bug, it’s a test of the communications system. Extraordinary claims used to require extraordinary proof until it was reversed so that extraordinary claims like men can become women, there is no such thing as inflation unless companies choose to raise prices and the police are committing genocide against black people became overwhelmingly accepted by liberal institutions with no proof at all, only ideological emoting, while the existence of women, inflation and crime required extraordinary degrees of proof and were denounced as dangerous backward notions.

In 2024, Democrats lost an election built on all three of those arguments. The general public continued to believe in the existence of women, wanted police to protect them from criminals and refused to believe that inflation was a figment of their imagination or could be solved by blaming companies for raising prices. As consequential as each of these three issues are, encompassing economics, society and the rule of law, the lies are crucial for understanding the corruption of the intellectual class and their role in corrupting our discourse.

The nation’s intellectual class has been divided for the most part between radicals who will assert anything, such as that looting is a public good, that castrating children is best for them and that AI will soon bring us ‘fully-automated luxury communism’ so that no one will have to work, and timid liberals who will pretend to believe anything to keep their class and station.

Universities, publishing, nonprofits and the other venues for intellectuals have become echo chambers in which any ideologically correct absurdities, no matter how manifestly irrational, false and mad, can take hold, thrive and then be used as a purity test to purge heretics. They are venues where only liars, idiots and those who pretend to believe them can earn a living.

It can be hard to tell apart the liars from those only pretending to believe their lies, and both are easily confused with the idiots who may only be pretending to be idiots, but in the final analysis all three are members of a political class pretending to be an intellectual class. When a lie becomes sufficiently unpopular, the people who pretended to believe the liars apologize for that particular lie alone, rather than for the moral and intellectual failings that led to it.

What other lies do they only pretend to believe? We’ll never know until those lies become unpopular too. But transgender ideology offered the simplest possible common sense test to people who claim to be able to tackle the most challenging scientific, ethical and philosophical dilemmas. They failed. And the entire edifice of an intellectual class failed along with them.

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donationThank you for reading.

 

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

"If You Like Your Doctor, You Will Be Able to Keep Your Doctor, Period"

And other lies from Barack Obama

By Susan Daniels Sep 23, 2025  @ Susan's Newsletter 

“And if you like your insurance plan, you will keep it. No one will be able to take that away from you. It hasn’t happened yet. It won’t happen in the future,” Obama said on April 1, 2010. In 2013, NBC News reported “that the Obama administration knew ‘millions’ could not keep their health insurance.”

Obamacare (aka Affordable Care Act) will expire at the end of the year if it is not extended. It was a scam from the beginning, starting with the company that designed the program, CGI Federal.

CGI is the U.S. arm of a Canadian company, and Toni Townes-Whitley, Princeton classmate of Michelle Obama, is a senior vice president. Her company was awarded a “no-bid contract to build the $678 million Obamacare enrollment website.”

It was a disaster from the first day, October 1, 2013, when only six people were able to enroll. Obama tried to enroll but was unable because there was a problem with his social security number.

Another $150 million was pumped in to try to fix the problems and the government finally shut the company down four months later. Despite that fiasco, CGI was later awarded billions of dollars in other government contracts, including “an ongoing indefinite-quantity contract for the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard.”

It is alleged that CGI donated $47 million to Obama’s reelection campaign in 2011.

White House Holiday Party 2010: Toni Townes-Whitley, her husband, John, and two grifters.

Illegals compose the largest number of uninsured individuals, with estimates between 45% to 71%. The law does not allow illegal aliens to be covered by Obamacare, but the Democrats use workarounds to beat the system with state-funded programs, emergency Medicaid, federally funded health centers, and off-exchange private plans.

“The number of undocumented immigrants receiving some form of healthcare or insurance is constantly changing, and there is no definitive total. However, reports from organizations like the Kaiser Family Foundation show that uninsured rates are significantly higher among undocumented immigrants compared to lawfully present immigrants and U.S. citizens.”

Other taxpayer benefits illegals get for free are SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Emergency Medicaid and Full-Scope Medicaid (whatever that is).

“The cost of ‘Obamacare’ to the US is complex, but as of 2023, the federal government spent $1.6 trillion net on healthcare subsidies and programs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and other initiatives.”

The plan was “substandard” from the start and forced people to accept it or pay a tax. The federal tax imposed on those who refused to join existed from 2013 until 2019; they were penalized at $695 for each adult and $347,50 for each child.

Democrats are demanding that Republicans extend the ACA as part of the threat to shut down the government. The subsidies have been extended twice, but now the Republicans are in charge, and many will gladly let them expire on September 30.

Let’s see which RINOs give in.