Understanding the connection between energy and economic growth, Mexico's President Enrique Pena Nieto set out to reform his country's energy policy and invite outside intelligence and investment to boost slumping oil output. In late 2013, he succeeded in getting the constitution amended to allow private and foreign companies to explore and produce oil and gas in Mexico-for the first time in nearly eight decades. The amendments put an end to the government monopoly. Foreign companies can now compete with, or partner with, Pemex-the national oil company. Nieto hopes his reforms will bring in $50 billion in investment by 2018.
The wheels of
reform move slowly, but on July 15, the first international investors put their
toes in the shallow water of Mexico's oil prize-which could be "as big as
the proven reserves of Kuwait." The Financial Times (FT) calls Mexico's potential 107.5 billion barrels of oil:
"quite a feast." FT adds: "The country is viewed as one of the
dwindling number of opportunities to add substantial reserves to portfolios
after several years when the oil majors have struggled to make big
discoveries."
Disappointing Start
Yet, despite the
possibilities, Mexico's first of three auctions expected this year, being
called round 1.1, was disappointing, at best. In round 1.1, 14 shallow water
blocks were offered. Only two had successful bids: block 2 off the coast of
Veracruz and block 7 off of Tabasco. The winning bidder for both blocks was
Sierra Oil & Gas-a Mexican company in a consortium with U.S. company, Talos,
and Britain's Premier Oil.
Thirty-eight
companies-including majors such as ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Russia's
Lukoil-qualified to participate in the auctions, though only nine participated
in round 1.1. Bloomberg Business reports: "Spokesmen for Exxon and Chevron said that while
they weren't interested in the shallow-water round of bidding, they hadn't
given up on being part of Mexico's energy reform."
When Mexico's
energy reforms began, oil was in the $100 a barrel range, the Mexican
government expected four to seven of the blocks would be sold-representing a
goal of 30-50 percent. On July 15, the success rate was a less-than-expected 14
percent.
Bad Timing
Unfortunately for
Nieto, the timing couldn't have been worse. Not only are global oil prices 50
percent of what they were when the constitutional amendments passed, the week
during which the auction was scheduled, turned out to be bad news for Nieto's
hopes.
First, four days
before the auction took place, "El Chapo," Mexico's most notorious
drug lord, broke out of one of the country's highest security prisons-again. The
Economist states: "The escape of El Chapo is proof that the rule of
law in Mexico is still shaky." FT echoes the sentiment: the escape shows "impunity,
corruption and the weak rule of law remain the norm in Mexico rather than the
exception."
The fields up for
auction on July 15 were fields with lower probabilities of success-6-54
percent, according to a FuelFix report. While smaller companies are more willing to gamble on
success, they can't afford the security or kickbacks needed to co-exist with
the cartels. The Economist explains: "Disorder does not always deter
investors who can afford armoured cars and bodyguards, but it puts off smaller
businesses, Mexican and foreign."
One small U.S,
company told me: "Mexico's past history is one of political instability,
expropriations, quick changes in government policies, graft and corruption,
inefficiencies, and socialist-style attitudes and philosophy. With abundant
opportunities in the U.S., and less risk here, why invest in Mexico?"
At the same time
the news of El Chapo broke, reports indicated a deal with Iran was imminent.
The nuclear accord was struck the day before Mexico's historic auction.
Concerns that Iran will soon begin exporting 1.5 million barrels of oil a day,
making crude prices slide further, dampened interest in new exploration.
El Chapo's escape
highlighted the risk, while the Iran deal reduced the reward. The scales didn't
tip in Mexico's favor.
Poor Offering
While the July 15
auction wasn't the success it was hoped to be, there is cause for optimism.
Perhaps to give itself time to work out the kinks, the National Hydrocarbon
Commission offered the less desirable parcels first. The New York Times (NYT) states: "the lots offered in the first round of a
multiyear auction process were not among the most commercially
attractive."
The majors, which
skipped the first auction, are more interested in the deep water
projects-scheduled for auction in early 2016-where the risk is lower and the
reward is higher. NYT explains: "The biggest growth will probably come in
deep water fields that are adjacent to bountiful American production fields and
that have yet to be thoroughly explored. The fields are thought to be large and
have the added advantage of being close to the vast pipeline network in the
American portion of the Gulf of Mexico, as well as American refineries and the
American market itself."
Additionally, the
onshore potential will be of more interest to the new Mexican oil
companies-many of which previously worked for Pemex as oil-field service
contractors. They have experience with drilling on land but will need foreign
partners for offshore exploration. The onshore blocks are scheduled for auction
in December.
Unattractive Terms
When the terms,
designed to maximize Mexico's take more than to attract investment, were first
announced, they generated little interest. They have been sweetened twice since
then-and will likely be revised before the next auction.
Winners, who were
pre-qualified as able to meet the financial requirements, were determined by
the highest amount of profit to be shared with the Mexican government and the
amount of investment pledged above the required minimum-which was set by the
finance ministry and kept in a sealed envelope that was opened at the auction.
For the two blocks awarded in the July 15 auction, the winner offered 55.99 %
for the first block and 68.99% for the second. In each case, an investment of
10% above the minimum was offered. Some of the blocks that were not awarded did
receive bids, but they were below the minimum-though the Wall Street Journal
(WSJ) reports: "several rejected bids fell just below the minimum."
One of the terms of
concern is the stringent guarantees required in case of a blowout such as the
Deepwater Horizon. The Economist calls them: "beyond international
norms" and the FT reports: "Four pre-qualified companies pulled out
last week-at least one because of the guarantees" which are
"essentially a blank cheque."
Additionally,
Mexico has reserved the right to rescind contracts-which reminds potential
investors a bit too much of Mexico's history of expropriation.
Pablo Medina, Latin
America upstream analyst at Wood MacKenzie, said, in WSJ: "I would expect
the government to incorporate what it's learned in the next tenders."
Cautious Optimism
Despite the various
bumps in the road, many are cautiously hopeful. Juan Carlos Zepeda president of
the National Hydrocarbon Commission, has, according to WSJ, "higher
expectations for subsequent auctions."
In OilPro.com,
Richard Sanchez, IHS Petrodata's lead Marine Market Analyst for the Americas, states: "Mexico has vast deepwater potential, comparable
to oil fields found on the US side of the Gulf of Mexico." It is too big
to fail. A consultant working with the new Mexican oil companies told me:
"The resources are world-class. Mexico's energy reforms will ultimately be
successful."
"The
government estimates almost half its unproven reserves lie in the deep waters
of the Gulf of Mexico," the FT reports. "In addition it holds the
world's sixth biggest technically recoverable shale gas and the eighth largest
shale oil prospects."
Jim Hoffman, an
oil-and-gas training and education provider who has worked in the industry for
35 years, told me: "Over time, opening Mexico will provide a huge boost
for both American producers and service companies at reduced cost. It won't
happen right away, but as the infrastructure gets built, results will become
better and better." He added: "How about jobs, for Mexicans, who
won't have to cross the border illegally? How about Americans who have the
opportunity to bring new and better technology and practices to an
underdeveloped industry location? What a great opportunity."
Mexico's energy
reform is rolling. The July 15 auction gave the country a chance to try it out
and start slowly-more of an evolution than a revolution. There is enthusiasm
for the future. The oil-price issue will work itself out as it will take three
to five years to develop the new fields. As the training wheels come off, the
terms are tweaked and the offerings are more attractive, results will become
better and better-delivering a whole new industry for Mexico and fresh
opportunities for American companies.
The author of Energy Freedom, Marita Noon serves as the executive director
for Energy Makes America Great Inc. and the companion educational
organization, the Citizens' Alliance for Responsible Energy (CARE). She hosts a
weekly radio program: America's Voice for Energy-which expands on the content
of her weekly column.
No comments:
Post a Comment