The IPCC's Great Dilemma
Row Over IPCC Report As Nations ‘Try To Hide Global Warming Pause’
The IPCC’s dilemma is this.
How can it expect the public to believe that recent warming is mostly manmade
when the models on which it has based this claim have been shown to be fatally
flawed? --Andrew Montford, The
Spectator, 23 September 2013
Scientists working on a
landmark UN report on climate change to be published this week are at
loggerheads over their explanation for why the earth’s surface temperature has
stopped rising as rapidly as they previously predicted. The behind-the-scenes
wrangling is likely to cast a shadow over the publication on Friday of the
2,000-page report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
--Robert Mendick, The
Sunday Telegraph, 22 September 2013
For the first time, an
assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will
be widely judged more for what it says about the IPCC than for what it says
about the climate. It is not the climate that needs fixing but the climate
models. --Rupert Darwall, National
Review Online, 22 September 2013
Now that the global warming
‘pause’ has made the transition from sceptical to mainstream the exclusion of
it from previous debates because of the ‘false balance’ argument can be seen
for what it was. It actually kept the truth from the audience. It was
censorship. It turned out to be the right idea, and journalism – the testing of
viewpoints in the cauldron of debate – misled the audience. The handling of the
‘pause’ in global surface temperature has been a failure for science
communication and science journalism. --David Whitehouse, The
Global Warming Policy Foundation, 23 September 2013
More than ever, scientists
say they’re convinced the Earth’s climate is warming. Yet lawmakers are
struggling to do anything about it because the pace of change has unexpectedly
slowed. The data has caused a United Nations panel to lower predictions of the
pace of global temperature increases by 2100, according to draft documents
obtained by Bloomberg ahead of publication due on Sept. 27. The findings muddy
the picture about how much carbon dioxide output is affecting the climate,
giving ammunition to those who doubt the issue needs urgent action. Skeptics
have succeeded in “confusing the public,” said Michael Jacobs, who advised the
U.K. government on climate policy until 2010. --Alex Morales, Bloomberg,
23 September 2013
It's a climate puzzle that
has vexed scientists for more than a decade. Since just before the start of the
21st century, the Earth's average global surface temperature has failed to rise
despite soaring levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases and years of dire
warnings from environmental advocates. Now, as scientists with the IPCC gather
in Sweden, they are finding themselves pressured to explain this glaring
discrepancy. "The stakes have been raised by various people, especially
the skeptics." --Monte Morin, Los
Angeles Times, 23 September 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment