I had the
privilege of meeting with Charlie Drevna, President of American Fuel and
Petrochemical Manufacturers this week. He had some extremely interesting things
to say about the way mounting environmental regulations are threatening jobs in
the refining sector that he represents.
A particularly
compelling insight he provided was that many of the Obama administration’s
environmental regulations actually contradict each other. For instance, CAFE
regulations require higher fuel efficiency from automobiles. Yet the Renewable
Fuel Standard, which mandates the use of less efficient ethanol, reduces fuel
efficiency. Meanwhile, the Tier III rules from EPA contradict the rulemaking on
greenhouse gas emissions: refineries need to do more processing to reduce
sulfur in gasoline, which increases emissions at a refinery by up to 2.3 percent,
while at the same time they are required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Two more
examples: to reduce ozone in the atmosphere under the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) requires more energy. More energy requires more
greenhouse gas emissions, so there is another clear contradiction. Finally,
state sulfur regulations contradict federal greenhouse gas regulations — if you
use energy to reduce the sulfur in heating oil, you will increase your
greenhouse gas emissions…..To Read More…..
No comments:
Post a Comment