Section 1 - Judicial Powers
Article
III describes the third branch of the government’s separated powers. It explains the structure, function and jurisdiction
of the judicial branch. Supreme Court
cases involving the power of the judicial branch include Marbury v. Madison (1803).
This case was the first time that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress (a section of the Judiciary Act of 1789) to be unconstitutional. This is an exercise of the power of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to interpret laws in light of the Constitution.
This case was the first time that the Supreme Court declared an act of Congress (a section of the Judiciary Act of 1789) to be unconstitutional. This is an exercise of the power of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to interpret laws in light of the Constitution.
Chief
Justice John Marshall explained, “[T]he Constitution of the United States
confirms and strengthens the principle… that a law repugnant to the
Constitution is void.” Furthermore, the Supreme Court is the proper authority
to decide if a law is in conflict with the Constitution. He called this
responsibility “the very essence of judicial duty.” In the Federalist Papers,
Alexander Hamilton discussed “the rights of
the courts to pronounce legislative acts void, because contrary to the
Constitution.” He explained in Federalist No. 78, “No legislative act,
therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid…” Although the Founders,
including Hamilton, considered the courts the weakest branch of government,
their power to identify and invalidate unconstitutional laws is essential to
the preservation of constitutional law.
The
judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and
in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain
and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts,
shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times,
receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during
their Continuance in Office.
Constitutional Topic: Separation of Powers
The Constitutional Topics pages at the USConstitution.net
site are presented to delve deeper into topics than can be provided on the Glossary Page
or in the FAQ pages. This Topic Page concerns the Separation
of Powers. The concept of Separation of Powers is embodied in the Constitution
in the 1st Article,
in the 2nd Article,
and in the 3rd Article. Another Topics Page, on The Government
provides details about the make-up of the various branches and may also be of
use.
Primary sources for this topic page are Comparative
Politics by Gregory Mahler (Schenkman Publishing,
1983) and Comparative Politics by Gregory Mahler (Prentice Hall, 2000).
Individual pages from Wikipedia
and Canada in the Making
were also helpful in keeping this page up to date.
The United States Constitution
is deliberately
inefficient. The Separation of Powers devised by the framers of the
Constitution was designed to do one primary thing: to prevent the majority from
ruling with an iron fist. Based on their experience, the framers shied away
from giving any branch of the new government too much power. The separation of
powers provides a system of shared power known as Checks and
Balances.
I would like to recommend reading the Historical Examples. You also may find information on the
issue of a “writ of mandamus” interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment