As you read these article please keep in mind that writers can only report so much in an article. We need to read a lot of articles but in order to have clarity - we need to read books, that way no single article promoting any given subject will fool you. I always think in this way about people, especially prominent people: Just because someone did something right in their life doesn't mean they get a pass on the rest of life. What does Donald Trump mean when he says, 'I went to Wharton'?, Ed Straker
Donald Trump frequently tells crowds that he went to Wharton as a credential to prove that he is intelligent:
"I went to the Wharton School of Business," he noted several times. "I'm, like, a really smart person." "Why do you have to tell us all the time that you went to Wharton?" moderator Chuck Todd asked. "People know you're successful."
"They know it's a great business school," Trump replied.
You
might be forgiven for thinking from this, as I did, that Trump has an
MBA from the Wharton School of Business. He
doesn't......
Trump vs. Cruz, and Handyman Irv, Lloyd Marcus
The MSM eagerly anticipated Ted Cruz responding to Donald Trump bringing up the issue of Cruz's eligibility to be president. The MSM hoped Trump's comments would launch a war of words between the two GOP frontrunners. To the MSM's chagrin, Ted Cruz wisely did not respond to Trump's remarks. The MSM loves to get GOP contenders at each other's throats rather than informing voters of Hillary's and Obama's moral, cultural, and unconstitutional crimes against Americans....
More 2016 Will Not Be like 1964 Jonathan Ehret
Over the past months, as Ted Cruz has steadily climbed in the polls and national exposure, the far left (and establishment right) have either gloated or fretted that Cruz winning the Republican nomination would leave him playing Barry Goldwater to Hillary Clinton's Lyndon Johnson. Unsurprisingly, this calculation comes from a woeful misreading of historical context, placing far too much emphasis on the candidates themselves and not the climate in which the 1964 election took place.
Unfortunately for aged Democratic candidates who seem trapped in a time warp of '60s radicalism, the world has not remained stagnant with them, and for scandal-plagued Hilary Clinton, there is no longer a media black hole to cover her tracks. By referencing 1964, Cruz detractors imply that he is an ideologically extreme candidate who will serve only to alienate a moderate majority straight into the arms of Mrs. Clinton. However, this analysis entirely omits the unique electoral situation in which Goldwater and Johnson squared off – one that is nearly the opposite of 2016.... Ted Cruz is no Barry Goldwater. (Though Hillary does have some things in common with Lyndon Johnson.)...
Gallup CEO: Belief that current government is corrupt fuels Trump popularity - William Tate
Widespread
belief that the current federal government is corrupt has fueled
Donald Trump's surprising resilience in the polls, suggests the head
of the Gallup polling organization. "A staggering 75% of
the American public believe corruption is 'widespread' in the U.S.
government. Not incompetence, but corruption. This alarming figure
has held steady since 2010, up from 66% in 2009," writes Gallup
Chairman and CEO Jim Clifton at the firm's website..... In an
article titled, Explaining
Trump: Widespread Government Corruption, Clifton notes:.....Trump vs. Cruz, and Handyman Irv, Lloyd Marcus
The MSM eagerly anticipated Ted Cruz responding to Donald Trump bringing up the issue of Cruz's eligibility to be president. The MSM hoped Trump's comments would launch a war of words between the two GOP frontrunners. To the MSM's chagrin, Ted Cruz wisely did not respond to Trump's remarks. The MSM loves to get GOP contenders at each other's throats rather than informing voters of Hillary's and Obama's moral, cultural, and unconstitutional crimes against Americans....
More 2016 Will Not Be like 1964 Jonathan Ehret
Over the past months, as Ted Cruz has steadily climbed in the polls and national exposure, the far left (and establishment right) have either gloated or fretted that Cruz winning the Republican nomination would leave him playing Barry Goldwater to Hillary Clinton's Lyndon Johnson. Unsurprisingly, this calculation comes from a woeful misreading of historical context, placing far too much emphasis on the candidates themselves and not the climate in which the 1964 election took place.
Unfortunately for aged Democratic candidates who seem trapped in a time warp of '60s radicalism, the world has not remained stagnant with them, and for scandal-plagued Hilary Clinton, there is no longer a media black hole to cover her tracks. By referencing 1964, Cruz detractors imply that he is an ideologically extreme candidate who will serve only to alienate a moderate majority straight into the arms of Mrs. Clinton. However, this analysis entirely omits the unique electoral situation in which Goldwater and Johnson squared off – one that is nearly the opposite of 2016.... Ted Cruz is no Barry Goldwater. (Though Hillary does have some things in common with Lyndon Johnson.)...
Gallup CEO: Belief that current government is corrupt fuels Trump popularity - William Tate
Is the Hive breaking up with Bill and Hillary? - By Fritz Pettyjohn
The disciplined drones and diligent worker bees of the Hive do the Queen's* bidding, but they also provide feedback to the Queen from the world outside the Hive. This, in turn, informs the Queen's future instructions. For a quarter century the Hive has viciously swarmed anyone who dared describe Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and Hillary as his enabler. No more.
The dam has been breached, and the truth bared. If Bill Clinton's conduct does not fit the definition of a sexual predator, then the term is meaningless. If Hillary -- in defending him, covering for him, lying for him, and besmirching his victims -- is not an enabler, who is? I think a couple things may be going on here. The strength of the Hive has waned, its ability to control the narrative is in decline. Donald Trump, of all people, has proven too strong a force to be ignored. Even though, 20 years ago, alternative media was still in its infancy, one of its pioneers, Matt Drudge, was nonetheless able to break through the Hive's defenses and expose the Lewinsky affair. Today it's so strong it can occasionally overcome the Hive........
No comments:
Post a Comment