Who knew that a 2016 Democrat
debate would be nothing but Bush-bashing? We are in year 7 of the Obama
administration, and Democrats are still blaming Bush. On the economy, we heard
over and over about the lousy state of the middle class and income inequality.
No one said a word about the $800-billion stimulus that was supposed to fix all
of that back in 2009! On foreign policy, we heard a lot about the decision to
invade Iraq. Unfortunately, no one on the CNN panel reminded the candidates
that it happened 12 years ago. We did not get a simple question about the 2011
decision to leave Iraq or the line in Syria that President Obama did not
enforce. Overall, it was hard to watch.
Thank God for the Dodgers-Mets game. My guess is that many people in LA and New
York were a lot more interested in the game than another round of Bush
derangement syndrome. Who won? It's hard
to say. The experts are saying that Mrs. Clinton won, but I disagree. First,
Mrs. Clinton has legal rather than electoral problems. The server issue is not
going away, regardless of whether Senator Sanders is tired of hearing about it. Second, the media, crazy for another Clinton
comeback kid story, may want to check out what Nate
Silver wrote about this:…..To Read More……
My Take - I disagree with Canto's disagreement. Clinton clearly won, but when you're debating economic idiots and social cowards who are more concerned about being Politically Correct than they are about intelligent solutions - which means abandoning Political Correctness and utterly insane leftist economics - how big a victory can that be? In a world of retards Hillary really would be the smartest woman in the world. In the real world - please name one really smart thing the "smartest woman in the world" ever did. Making retards look retarded doesn't count!
No comments:
Post a Comment