There
are many opinionated people on each side of the political spectrum, including
me, but I haven’t heard of any conservatives trying to muzzle leftists.
Liberals on the other hand? Ha. Man-made
global warming liberals ridicule skeptics as corrupt or brain-dead deniers, and
their advocate in chief, President Obama, habitually derides conservatives for
rejecting his hysterical narrative on climate change. Don’t
assume they do this solely for political advantage. It can be far more serious
than that.
A
claque of 20 climate scientists, in an open letter, urged Obama and Attorney
General Loretta Lynch to use the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act to criminally investigate “corporations and other
organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks
of climate change.” Knowingly
deceived? That’s rich, coming from a barely disguised political movement
tainted by well-documented fraud and corruption.
I’m
no scientist, but it is remarkable to me that the scientists and politicians
most adamantly demanding cloture on global warming debate violate the very
essence of science in their premature certitude. Doesn’t science involve
open-mindedness and liberal inquiry, even into questions that may seem to be
settled?
But
in the case of climate change, the matter is hardly settled, and it’s ironic
that proponents point to skeptics’ alleged corruption as their motivation for
denying the science. There is sick money, not to mention enormous peer
pressure, behind the climate change agenda (you’d better believe it’s an
agenda) and chilling any dissent. To wit: One of the principals behind the open
letter is Jagadish Shukla, a George Mason University professor who reportedly
receives an annual salary exceeding $250,000, in addition to multiples of that
amount from government climate grants paid to his nonprofit entity.......To Read More…….
No comments:
Post a Comment