Any time you get a bunch of Democrats together in the
same room, it is recommended that you grab hold of your wallet tightly and lock
up the family silver.......The Democratic
presidential candidates who took the stage for their debate on Tuesday night
tried to outdo one another in rushing to give away tax dollars on wild spending
schemes. How much are we talking about? The Washington Times has some thoughts….. Mrs. Clinton proposed $515 billion in new domestic
spending over 10 years in the debate Tuesday night, on initiatives ranging from
energy to education…….. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, called the Democrats’ event
Tuesday night “a liberal versus liberal debate about who was going to give away
the most free stuff.”
His criticism drew a rebuke from the
Democratic National Committee spokeswoman Christina Freundlich, who said Mr.
Rubio and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush are interested in “dishing out breaks
for the wealthiest and powerful corporations” while Democratic candidates are
pushing initiatives to help the middle class.
Compared to
Senator Sanders, Hillary Clinton is a spendthrift: The NTU has
calculated that Mr. Sanders‘ agenda totals $1 trillion in annual
spending increases, and that in the past six years he has supported spending at
levels 17 times higher than that of the average Senate Democrat......To Read More....
My Take - "Democratic candidates are pushing
initiatives to help the middle class"...really? First of all - who exactly
do they think are the middle class? Secondly, where exactly is all this money
going to come from? Oh wait ... I know.... I know....we can tax the top 10% of the economic pyramid real heavy, especially
the top 1%? Or perhaps we can tax the corporations even heavier? How's that sound?
Let's get this right! If they took all the
profits of the top 10% there wouldn't anywhere near enough to pay for all this
extra stuff let alone what they're already wasting. As for the corporations -
we need to get this - the super rich and corporation don't pay taxes. They
increase prices. Taxes are a cost of doing business and those costs are passed
on to the consumer and the super rich stop investing depressing the economy. That doesn't hurt the rich - it hurts this so-called "middle class" and the poor.
The only people who really pay taxes are those who can't
pass that cost down to others. And other than Bernie Sanders - who must be the
dumbest or craziest man on the planet because I really believe he's sincere in his conviction this is good for
humanity - they all know this is nothing more than a hidden tax on everyone
else, including the poor, who have to pay higher prices for everything.
At some
point the tax burden will be so high the producers will not be able to pass
these costs on because the consumers won't be able to afford the costs and stop buying. Then the producers will go out of business, further
destroying the economic security of the "middle class" and the poor these leftists claim to be so concerned about.
We really need to start thinking critically.
We need to question everything and to do that we need to think historically. We need to start reading history books! Let's get this once and for all - dystopia follows leftism just as sure as
night follows day. That’s been the
history of the world since the beginning of leftism with the French Revolution. If leftism has “always” been disastrous “everywhere”
– and it has - why would we think it would be different here and why would we believe it
would be different today or tomorrow?
No comments:
Post a Comment