How Congress Stopped a Massive Obamacare Bailout
- Earlier this month, the Obama administration announced
that insurers who lost money selling Obamacare would not get a $2.5-billion bailout. It was
great news for taxpayers, but it didn’t happen by chance. Both chambers of Congress worked very hard to make those
savings possible. And lawmakers will have to continue working hard to keep
bailouts like this from happening in the future. Here’s how Congress did it this time. But first, some
background. Obamacare used generosity to overcome insurance
companies’ objections to its excessive regulation. For starters, the law
mandated that everyone buy their product. It created new subsidies to help
people make those purchases. And it massively expanded Medicaid, which is
largely administered by insurers.
Meet the Academic Who Wants
Obama to Prosecute Climate Change Skeptics - Taxpayer-funded college professors
and researchers who cite climate change to advocate regulations that would
raise energy costs for consumers have some explaining to do, congressional
investigators say…… investigators also are curious to hear a George Mason
University environmentalist…..explain a growing disparity between computer
models showing global warming and fresh scientific evidence suggesting that Earth’s
temperatures have been flat for 18 years….“As evidence mounts that the dire
predictions of catastrophic global warming are not confirmed by climatological
observations, the alarmist camp has had to resort to witch hunts,” said Bonner
Cohen, senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research…. Steve McIntyre, a statistician noted for challenging the
data and methodology used in United Nations climate reports, writes the Climate
Audit blog.
McIntyre offers a detailed analysis of Shukla’s compensation and how it squares with university [and] the appearance that taxpayers are financing the environmentalist’s political activism……policymakers should take a hard look at the “Lysenko cult” that held sway in the days of the Soviet Union….The “falsification” and “bogus proofs” used to prop up Lysenko’s schemes is well-documented in the book “Power and Science: The History of the Destruction of Genetics in the USSR,” the Princeton physicist said. Climate science has attempted to do the same thing. In light of the “climategate” scandal that erupted in November 2009……it seems like those who manipulated charts to ‘hide the decline’ [in temperature] and conspired to prevent contrarian scholars from publishing in academic journals would be first on the docket.”
McIntyre offers a detailed analysis of Shukla’s compensation and how it squares with university [and] the appearance that taxpayers are financing the environmentalist’s political activism……policymakers should take a hard look at the “Lysenko cult” that held sway in the days of the Soviet Union….The “falsification” and “bogus proofs” used to prop up Lysenko’s schemes is well-documented in the book “Power and Science: The History of the Destruction of Genetics in the USSR,” the Princeton physicist said. Climate science has attempted to do the same thing. In light of the “climategate” scandal that erupted in November 2009……it seems like those who manipulated charts to ‘hide the decline’ [in temperature] and conspired to prevent contrarian scholars from publishing in academic journals would be first on the docket.”
School District Stands Up to
Government Over Transgender Students in Locker Rooms - When it comes to locker rooms, does
a public school have the right to say it should be restricted to of the
students of the same physiological sex? Right
now, a school district north of Chicago is squaring off with the federal
government on that question. Township
High School District 211, like many school districts, is wrestling with how to
balance the interests of transgender students with the privacy rights of other
students. Here’s what the district does to accommodate transgender students,
according to a newsletter the school emailed Oct.
12:
The Problems With the 'Investigation' That Cleared Lois Lerner - Kadzik says they found no evidence that Lerner’s personal political views, which he describes in the personal emails the FBI examined, influenced her behavior. In fact, he compliments her, saying she tried to stop what was happening as soon as she “became fully aware of” it. But then, we don’t really know what her actual explanation is for what happened, how it happened, or why it happened, because she refused to answer any questions from the House committee investigating the matter. All we have are Kadzik’s conclusions about why it happened—mismanagement, lack of guidance, ignorance—without any recitation of the actual evidence that was gathered from which to draw our own conclusions.
Moreover, the Justice Department refused to enforce the
contempt citation issued against Lois Lerner by the House for refusing to
answer those questions. As previously
explained, Lerner waived her ability to assert her Fifth Amendment right
when she gave an extensive statement to the Justice Department. In this letter,
Kadzik admits that Lerner voluntarily submitted to a 12-hour interview without
any immunity agreement or promise of non-prosecution. Therefore, the decision
by the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia this past March, when
he refused to present the contempt citation to
a federal grand jury was legally and factually wrong. But there is no mention
of this in Kadzik’s letter. Of course,
there is also another glaring omission in Kadzik’s letter……. Given the
“politicization [that] continues to go unchecked by this administration,” Rep.
Goodlatte criticized the Justice Department’s
decision….
No comments:
Post a Comment