Those peddling “income inequality” use a dishonest term, have provided the economic changes they decry and propose an increase in the cause as a cure. This proclaims their compassion. The term ‘income inequality’ is preposterous; one may as well bewail inequality of respect. Income and respect are both earned and tend to differ among us. How much that we receive of either responds mostly to our efforts as judged in the eyes of others. ‘Income inequality’ mavens are proclaiming that they, not the market, should decide incomes. Parsing that, one finds the desire to replace economics with politics. Historically, the wealth of Western civilization appears to rest upon doing the opposite. Using “income inequality” in the present fashion seems economic subversion…….
The ‘inequality’ pitchmen are using a natural economic response as an excuse to assert more government economic intervention in the name of a false ‘fairness.’ Never mind that in history, government economic control has been inversely proportional to economic success, the recent Soviet Union and its imitators (like present-day Venezuela) in point. ‘Income inequality’ is a political tool forged by the Left to manage destructive results of its own policies. It was the Left that gave us politicized unions with their inherent wage escalator and endemic corruption.…… The union rapprochement with the political Left is corruption; the resulting substitution of political for economic decisions expresses the rot……. The American Progressives……are now returning Western humanity to serfdom. Government-mandated income equality contradicts economic reality. When all the wealth not taken by the powerful is equalized among the rest, they end up sharing poverty. Where, with Progressives in power, are the middle-class housewives of yore?……
No comments:
Post a Comment