The Supreme Court ruled
Monday in favor of Samantha Elauf, a Muslim woman who sued for discrimination
after not being hired by Abercrombie and Fitch, because her insistence on
wearing the Muslim hijab conflicted with their dress code. Justice Antonin Scalia said of the 8-1 ruling,
“This is really easy” – but neither he nor the Justices who voted with him
showed any indication of realizing what was really at stake in this case. She won an award of
$20,000 in 2011, but a Court of Appeals overturned that, with the
judge explaining: “Ms. Elauf never informed Abercrombie before its hiring
decision that she wore her head scarf, or ‘hijab,’ for religious reasons.” The
Supremes should have taken the hint. They didn’t.
Why didn’t she? It wasn’t inconsequential, at least not for her. She
spent the ensuing years suing, losing, suing again, appealing until her case
reached the highest court in the land. So why didn’t she mention it? What was
her agenda? That is perfectly clear now.
I ask you: what devout Muslim girl would want to work for a firm that peddles erotic, sexy clothes and soft-porn images?.........It was all a set up. Why would Elauf want to work there? In order to force another major American business to accommodate Islamic norms – and this time, that sinister agenda won the aid of the United States Supreme Court......To Read More....
Editor's Note - For those who don't think this is an organized effort to impose Islam on the nation please take a look at this list - Islamization of the Workplace
No comments:
Post a Comment