Steve Milloy's Climategate 3.0 Picks

As you read these please think in legal terms, as in fraud!

Climategate 3.0: Mann to Jones (circa 1998) — ‘Happy to make my [codes, data, etc.] available’; Mann to McIntyre (circa 2005) — Get lost

This looks to be the e-mail exchange in which Mann first agrees to work with the UEA guys. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Media only concerned with number of scientists on warmist list for Kyoto; ‘No one is going to check…PhDs’

“Forget the screening, forget asking them about their last publication (most will ignore you.) Get those names!” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Greenpeace solicits Climategater to ghostwrite fact sheet; Willing to ‘pay standard rates’

 “We want to produce a briefing that replies to all the usual climate ‘sceptics’ arguments.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Greenpeace drafts self-serving letter-to-the-editor of The Times for Climategater signature

What a nice service Greenpeace provides — for itself. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Wigley claims UEA improperly withheld U.S. Government funds; ‘I am the loser’

Department of Energy money was supposed to go to Tom Wigley, but UEA’s Climate Research Unit didn’t pay Wigley. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Worries about public learning that WWF funded the list of scientists; ‘It will be perceived to be biased’

So maybe the Union of Concerned Scientists could do the distribution instead? Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: World Wildlife Fund commissions yet another UEA climate project

The World Wildlife Fund seems to own the University of East Anglia researchers. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Enviros propose hiring UEA ‘gaters for Kyoto Conference

The World Wildlife Fund and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: WWF asks for ‘gaters help against skeptical questions at Alaska media event; ‘Anything to fend off the naysayers’

Note that the World Wildlife Fund also tries to co-sponsor a meeting with the Dutch department of public health (RIVM) on climate change. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Mike Hulme’s BBC appearance likened to ‘Pope making very authoritive pronouncements’

“I am sure our Minister for the Environment, Simon Upton will like it, as he was getting frustrated at the industry lobbey, and the pro-industry press in NZ.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Tom Wigley goes ballistic over list of scientists supporting Kyoto; Asking people to ‘prostitute themselves’

“I was very disturbed by your recent letter, and your attempt to get others to endorse it.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: World Wildlife Fund pays Climategaters to develop list of warmist scientists for 1997 Kyoto meeting; ‘Disaster’ if skeptics build larger list

“Disaster is we only get 250 and they ended up getting 400.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Phil Jones attacks UK skeptic Piers Corbyn as an ‘utter prat’

But he’s not all bad as he shares Jones’ anti-nuclear views. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Briffa worries that manmade environmental change distorts tree-ring analysis

In October 1996, Keith Briffa frets that the calibration for tree-ring analysis may be off due to manmade changes in the environment. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Wigley accuses IPCC and lead authors of ‘dishonest presentations of model results’; Accuses Mann of deception; Mann admits

Mann: “Its (sic) hard to imagine what sort of comparison wouldn’t be deceptive.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: In 2009, Schneider touts spike in warming by 2014

It had better get dramatically warm soon. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: No consensus among the consensus

Tom Wigley dissents from Kevin Trenberth’s observation of no warming since 1998. Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Mann, Schneider outraged that BBC reports no warming since 1998; Mann suggests MetOffice police the Beeb

This e-mail exchange that elicited Kevin Trenberth’s famous “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” Continue reading →

Climategate 3.0: Phil Jones, much to his chagrin, plays bridge with mostly skeptics

Phil Jones complains to Michael mann and Gavin Schmidt that his bridge partners read the skeptical Telegraph, not the warmest-friendly Observer. Continue reading →

 Climategate 3.0: Briffa secures agreement from NYTimes Revkin to police Wall Street Journal editorial writer

Imagine your very own New York Times reporter that you could unleash at will. Continue reading →

 Climategate 3.0: Mann tries intimidating Wall Street Journal editorial writer with tough talk and Media Matters

In response to a polite media inquiry from Wall Street journal editorial writer Anne Jolis, Mann rages, in part, “Misrepresenting the work of scientists is a serious offense” — and then cc’s his response to Media Matters, Joe Romm and other allies in the warmest-media industrial complex. Continue reading →

 Climategate 3.0: Mike Mann urges Phil Jones to get George Monbiot to attack Christopher Booker