Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Friday, March 15, 2013

Steve Milloy's Climategate 3.0 Picks

As you read these please think in legal terms, as in fraud!
This looks to be the e-mail exchange in which Mann first agrees to work with the UEA guys. Continue reading
“Forget the screening, forget asking them about their last publication (most will ignore you.) Get those names!” Continue reading
 “We want to produce a briefing that replies to all the usual climate ‘sceptics’ arguments.” Continue reading
What a nice service Greenpeace provides — for itself. Continue reading
Department of Energy money was supposed to go to Tom Wigley, but UEA’s Climate Research Unit didn’t pay Wigley. Continue reading
So maybe the Union of Concerned Scientists could do the distribution instead? Continue reading
The World Wildlife Fund seems to own the University of East Anglia researchers. Continue reading
The World Wildlife Fund and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Continue reading
Note that the World Wildlife Fund also tries to co-sponsor a meeting with the Dutch department of public health (RIVM) on climate change. Continue reading
“I am sure our Minister for the Environment, Simon Upton will like it, as he was getting frustrated at the industry lobbey, and the pro-industry press in NZ.” Continue reading
“I was very disturbed by your recent letter, and your attempt to get others to endorse it.” Continue reading
“Disaster is we only get 250 and they ended up getting 400.” Continue reading
But he’s not all bad as he shares Jones’ anti-nuclear views. Continue reading
In October 1996, Keith Briffa frets that the calibration for tree-ring analysis may be off due to manmade changes in the environment. Continue reading
Mann: “Its (sic) hard to imagine what sort of comparison wouldn’t be deceptive.” Continue reading
It had better get dramatically warm soon. Continue reading
Tom Wigley dissents from Kevin Trenberth’s observation of no warming since 1998. Continue reading
This e-mail exchange that elicited Kevin Trenberth’s famous “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.” Continue reading
Phil Jones complains to Michael mann and Gavin Schmidt that his bridge partners read the skeptical Telegraph, not the warmest-friendly Observer. Continue reading
Imagine your very own New York Times reporter that you could unleash at will. Continue reading
In response to a polite media inquiry from Wall Street journal editorial writer Anne Jolis, Mann rages, in part, “Misrepresenting the work of scientists is a serious offense” — and then cc’s his response to Media Matters, Joe Romm and other allies in the warmest-media industrial complex. Continue reading

No comments:

Post a Comment