Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Appeasing the Crocodile To Protect "Our" Democracy

By Rich Kozlovich

On January 11, 2024 I published this article, The No Labels Party, commenting about the glowing terms he painted that party saying:

No Labels Party? You don’t really believe that do you? Recently there was a discussion among those who comment regularly on American Thinker, and I’m one of them, regarding Nikki Haley’s slave comments. That was why over blown by the way. There's more than enough to destroy her credibility that’s legitimate. That was a load of media driven hog swallow............What do they believe in? Moderation? What's the difference between a No Name political candidate and a moderate? It would seem they're living in the middle of the road and traffic is coming at them speedily, with no brakes. 

And that brings us right back to where were were: What is a No Labels Party? Are they centrists or moderates? What exactly are centrists or moderates anyway? Maybe they're the "No Opinion Party", or the "No Guts No Glory Party"? How about the "Party of Invertebrates"? 

The claim their mission is to "advance the interests of the commonsense majority." Really, how do they define common sense? Is it leftist tyrannical dogma, or is it the willingness to defend the greatest secular document every created, the U.S. Constitution? 

All their rhetorical clabber sounds more like psychobabble to confuse everyone to allow all the insanity to go one without pause. Make no mistake, all that clabber isn't evidence of courageous deep thinkers with an independent streak willing to stand against the current, willing to fight against the corrupt status quo. They're appeasers, sheep waiting to be slaughtered by the wolves, and trying to convince the rest of us to get slaughtered with them. 

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile-hoping it will eat him last. Winston Churchill 

I went on to say: 

And anyone who tells me they're a "No Labels" political entity, I already know one of three things.  They're lying, they're delusional, or their stupid. (Note:  Probably all three. RK) I find the lying part especially applicable when looking at their donors list.  They want to win?  Really?  How delusional is that?  The best they can hope for is to be spoilers.  

In my piece, Is it the Drugs?  It Must Be the Drugs!, I defined their leaders of this movement in this way.  "I believe they must be such world class grifters they make "The Yellow Kid", the world's greatest grifter, look honest." 

Interestingly, it isn't conservatives who are against them, it's the Democrats.  took a much harder view in her article, No Labels Cries Foul to DOJ saying:

 With an eight-page Department of Justice complaint in its back pocket, the No Labels organization came out swinging at a National Press Club event yesterday, Jan. 18, alleging conspiracy, criminal behavior, and voter intimidation by several activist political groups it says are hindering the nascent party’s 2024 ballot access initiative.......

The question is whether the anti-No Labels groups have crossed the line from typical hardball politics into criminal behavior. “The activists, operatives, and party officials behind this conspiracy,” the organization contends in the DOJ letter, “claim to be protecting American democracy, but they are in fact actively subverting it ................…”

On June 23, 2023, Melissa Moss, former finance director for the Democratic Party and representative of the Lincoln Project, asked to meet with Holly Page, a No Labels co-founder, and Board of Advisors member, for breakfast in Washington … During the breakfast, Ms. Moss explicitly threatened Ms. Page’s financial future based on her affiliation with No Labels. 

In particular, Ms. Moss stated, ‘You have no idea of the forces aligned against you. You will never be able to work in Democratic politics again.’ She later added, ‘You are going to get it with both barrels.'”

Leftists of one sect attacking leftists of another sect.  Just like socialists attacking communists and vice versa.  All to protect "our" democracy.  Imagine that.


No comments:

Post a Comment