By Rich Kozlovich
Recently Jerome Corsi published an article entitled, Clinton aide could prove criminal acts in Hillary probe, saying:
Recently Jerome Corsi published an article entitled, Clinton aide could prove criminal acts in Hillary probe, saying:
"Justin Cooper, a little-known Clinton political operative with important financial ties to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, is certain to be at the center of the “official acts” part of the FBI investigation into Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, which is examining whether she committed criminal acts by using her State Department office to influence donations to the Clinton Foundation. Cooper was copied in an email that shows, contrary to Hillary Clinton’s original claims, she used more than one private account while serving as secretary of state."
He went on to show how complex Hillary's illegal e-mail scheme truly was saying:
He went on to show how complex Hillary's illegal e-mail scheme truly was saying:
As first reported by Breitbart in September 2015, archived Internet records establish that Hillary Clinton’s private email server was registered to Justin Cooper on Jan. 13, 2009, approximately one month before she was sworn in as secretary of state. Breitbart noted that Cooper was listed as the registrant of Clinton’s private email server until Jan. 30, 2013, when control over the server was transferred to Denver-based Platte River Network. The server was re-registered to Perfect Privacy, LLC, a company “that takes over registrant duties and enters its own meaningless Florida contact information into domain databases to hide the true ownership after she left the State Department.”...
Recently I had the opportunity to talk briefly to Nicole Wallace, the communications chief for George Bush, and said I thought there was something wrong with Hillary's mind for her to make the decisions she did over this issue. Her comment was she didn't agree but felt it was an attitude of elitist arrogance believing the rules don't apply to the Clintons. I've thought about this and I still think there's something wrong with her mind, but I've changed my mind as to what it is that's broken.
First of all - people who work in intelligence aren't just instructed in how important it is to keep things secure - they're indoctrinated with it. So too would anyone in office that's privy to that information.
Secondly - as Secretary of State she had to know how intelligence is collected - not the details - but she would certainly know how information is gathered overall, and the capabilities of intelligence services here and abroad. As a result - she had to know - absolutely know - her servers were not only un-secure - she had to know the likelihood of being hacked was 100%.
I would be willing to bet the Russians, Chinese and Israelis were not only capable of hacking her computers - they did! Is it any wonder Putin has been playing chess while Obama has been playing checkers? Although I don't think any of these players really need inside information to out maneuver Obama and his myrmidons and sycophants.
I think I know what's wrong with her mind - she just doesn't care! It's all about Hill and Bill and what they can gain, what they can hide, what they can get away with, how they can benefit at the expense of others - and neither of them care one bit about the consequences of their actions may be to anyone or anything else. I think its clear both she and Bill are psychopaths. Although there are those who say they're sociopaths and there are those who use the terms interchangebly - "everyone agrees there are common behaviorial traits shared by sociopaths and psychopaths, and they include":
- A disregard for laws and social mores
- A disregard for the rights of others
- A failure to feel remorse or guilt
- A tendency to display violent behavior
While sociopaths can still form attachments to people or things psychopaths are different in two crucial ways. They're capable of hiding their psychopathy well, but they're "are unable to form emotional attachments or feel real empathy with others, although they often have disarming or even charming personalities. Psychopaths are very manipulative and can easily gain people’s trust. They learn to mimic emotions, despite their inability to actually feel them, and will appear normal to unsuspecting people. Psychopaths are often well educated and hold steady jobs. Some are so good at manipulation and mimicry that they have families and other long-term relationships without those around them ever suspecting their true nature."
"When committing crimes, psychopaths carefully plan out every detail in advance and often have contingency plans in place. Unlike their sociopathic counterparts, psychopathic criminals are cool, calm, and meticulous. Their crimes, whether violent or non-violent, will be highly organized and generally offer few clues for authorities to pursue. Intelligent psychopaths make excellent white-collar criminals and "con artists" due to their calm and charismatic natures."
The other difference is it's believed psychopaths aren't created by conditons that caused emotional harm. With psychopaths it's genetic! That's the Clintons.
What's always amazed me is how many of their co-conspirators have been willing to fall on their swords for these two. That may not go on much longer. Even the mob has it's "rats" who will deal with prosecutors to stay out of prison, get reduced sentences or better conditions. So too will someone here - if they're prosecuted!
Maybe!
However, there are two questions that need answering before we can be sure of that. First - do these people fall on their swords for the Clintons because they're "true believers"? Is there an emotional component to all of this that borders on religiosity? The second question: Will the Obama administration act according to law? Not likely! They have the same mental disorder from which Hill and Bill suffer - they just don't care about the consequences of their actions unless it impacts them. It makes one wonder how many psychopaths there are in government.
Will Hillary and those around her finally meet their Waterloo? Do you remember the comment by the agent at the end of the movie Charlie Wilson's War. “We’ll see.”
No comments:
Post a Comment