How the Radical-in-Chief ordered federal officials to
mislead the public about the Jihadist massacre in San Bernardino
On the day of the deadly San Bernardino, Calif. massacre,
President Obama ignored FBI-procured evidence that the attack was an Islamic
terrorist operation and ordered federal officials to mislead the public about
the true nature of the assault.
Although the FBI knew immediately on Dec. 2 that the
mass-casualty event was a Muslim terrorist attack, Obama and FBI Director James
Comey reportedly clashed
over why Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, opened fire around 11 a.m.
local time on Farook’s municipal government workmates, leaving 14 dead and 21
wounded.
The news comes as investigator Phil Haney, who helped to
create the Department of Homeland Security, revealed
on Fox News that the government shut down a database he created that might have
helped to prevent the attack. Haney says he looked into groups that had ties to
Farook and Malik as far back as 2012. But civil rights officials accused him of
unfairly profiling Muslims, removed his security clearance, and destroyed the
data he collected.
Meanwhile in the Oval Office, the official
head-scratching over the events in San Bernardino continued. “(I]mmense
political pressure was brought down on investigators to avoid using the term
‘terrorism,’ with Obama stating, ‘It is possible that this is terrorist
related, but we don’t know ... It is also possible that this was workplace
related.’”......
A huge tiny minority of extremists.
After Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook killed 14 Americans
in their corner of the Jihad over in San Bernardino, the media began its long
laborious search for their moment of “radicalization”.The assumption that the
intersection of terrorism and Islam can only be an aberration lead to the
conviction that there was some moment in time at which Malik and Farook became
“radical extremists”. Initial reports pegged that moment of “radicalization” as
having happened at some point during the twenty minutes after Farook left the
party. When the amount of firepower and preparation made the idea of a twenty
minute radicalization massacre seem silly, the media tried to stretch it back
for weeks. Now they’ve had to give in and pull back that dreadful
moment of radicalization for years.
But what if Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik were never
“radicalized”? What if neither of them “influenced” the other? What if both
were exactly what they appear to be, devout Muslims who hated America and
believed that it was their religious duty to kill Americans? What if this
attitude did not show up last week or last year? What if it was the way that
their culture and religion taught them to live? There are some easy ways to test that theory......
When twisted Islamist ideas and lethal Jew-Hatred are protected in the name of diversity.
To live in the world of Islam for a single month.
Why Erdogan is the problem.
Is the U.S.-Israel alliance really all about oil?
Why affirmative action mismatchs students and hurts everyone.
How corrupt hiring practices at the Department of Homeland Security are putting American lives at risk.
Time to name the enemy.
The grim antithesis to liberal education.
The disturbing pattern of terrorism in America becoming a family affair.
Islamic terrorist savagery, then and now.
Why radical professors think the "chickens have come home to roost" for the West.
Broward Mayor, Vice Mayor Make Videos Praising Radical Muslim Group - Joe Kaufman
Marty Kiar and Barbara Sharief embrace groups linked to terror and bigotry.
There is no ambiguity in the law and it leaves no room for doubt.
No comments:
Post a Comment