Paul Driessen
When a private citizen or company violates rules,
misrepresents facts or pollutes a river, government penalties are swift and
severe. It’s different when the government lies or screws up.
Two weeks ago, Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell
testified before Congress on a toxic spill that federal and state agencies
unleashed into western state rivers last August. Supervised by officials from
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Colorado Division of
Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS), an Environmental Restoration (ER)
company crew excavated tons of rock and debris that had blocked the portal
(entrance or adit) to the Gold King Mine above Silverton, Colorado.
The crew kept digging until the remaining blockage burst
open, spilling 3,000,000 gallons of acidic water laden with iron, lead,
cadmium, mercury and other heavy metals. The toxic flood contaminated the
Animas and San Juan Rivers, all the way to Lake Powell in Utah. EPA then waited
an entire day before notifying downstream mayors, health officials, families,
kayakers, fishermen, farmers and ranchers that the water they were drinking,
paddling in, or using for crops and livestock was contaminated.
Ms. Jewell told Congress she was unaware of anyone being
fired, fined or even demoted. In fact, federal investigations and reports
didn’t hold anyone responsible for the disaster. (Maybe they even got bonuses.)
Considering the spill’s severity, the gross incompetence of government
officials, their advance knowledge of the dangers, and the way they downplayed
and whitewashed their actions, this is intolerable.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy did say she was “absolutely, deeply sorry.” But then FEMA denied disaster relief to the Navajos,
and EPA sent them emergency water tanks contaminated with oil!
As I explained in a detailed analysis, experts had warned
that contaminated water had probably backed up hundreds of feet upward into the
mine, creating the risk of a sudden, powerful toxic flashflood. EPA, DRMS and
ER’s prior experience with nearby mines meant they personally knew the high risks in
advance. In a
June 2014 work plan for the planned cleanup, ER itself had warned: “Conditions may exist that
could result in a blowout of the blockages and cause a release of large volumes
of contaminated mine waters and sediment from inside the mine, which contain
concentrated heavy metals.”
Yet they went ahead, with no emergency plans for dealing
with a toxic spill. They didn’t even follow their own ill-conceived plan. As the
contamination moved downstream, they claimed they had simply “miscalculated”
how much water had backed up and insisted they had been “very careful.” Barely
a week after the spill, Ms. McCarthy said the river is “restoring itself” to
“pre-spill conditions” – something she would never say if a privately owned
company had caused similar contamination.
On August 24, EPA issued a preliminary report that can
only be called a Tom Sawyer whitewash, designed to
absolve the perpetrators of any blame, liability, civil penalty or criminal
prosecution.
It says the state and federal
personnel at Gold King were “senior mining experts” and “experienced
professionals” who have “extensive experience with the investigation and
closure of mines.” But their names were all redacted
from the summary, and their actions strongly suggest that they had little
training or experience in reopening mines or dealing with possible water
impoundments and toxic spills.
The EPA/DRMS determination that there was “no or low mine
water pressurization” at Gold King was supposedly based on actual observations.
However, the EPA review team said it “was not able to identify any calculations
made on the possible volume of water that could be held behind the portal
plug.”
In fact, the “professionals” simply claimed ongoing mine
drainage showed that a pressure buildup was not likely. Wrong. It simply showed
that the compacted overburden was able to hold back an enormous volume of water
– until they destroyed its structural integrity. They also said a similar
excavation at a nearby mine “did not result in a blowout.” But that’s
irrelevant. Every mine is unique and must be treated as if a worst-case
scenario could unfold. The other mine didn’t have serious water backup; Gold
King did.
Perhaps the most blatant
example of self-serving excuses is on page 7, which says in relevant part:
“Mine water pressurization data from behind the blockage
potentially could have been obtained through a drill hole inserted further back
into the [Gold King] Adit from above the mine tunnel. Such a technique was …
not used at the [Gold King] Adit [because it] would have been very difficult
and expensive … and require much more planning and multiple field seasons to
accomplish. Although difficult and therefore expensive and technically
challenging, this procedure may have been able to discover the pressurized
conditions that turned out to cause the blowout.” [emphasis added]
In truth, the crew could easily have drilled a borehole
lined with steel pipe from above the portal into an area behind the blockage,
and then used simple instruments to determine the water pressure and extent of
water backup, before beginning to dig. They had done this elsewhere and at
could have done it at Gold King for less than $75,000, experienced miners told
me. It was not “technically challenging.”
These “experienced
professionals” guessed but did not test. They simply assumed there was
limited water in the mine, and charged blindly ahead. And they did it after
bullying their way onto the Gold King premises by threatening its owner with $35,000 per
day in fines if he did not allow them on his property.
Their actions were grossly
negligent. In fact, they are criminal offenses under the Clean Water Act and
other laws that the government routinely uses to fine and jail private citizens
and company employees, such as John Pozsgai, Bill Ellen, and employees of Freedom Industries and
the Pacific & Arctic Railway. None of these “convicted felons” intended
to cause those accidents, and all were “absolutely, deeply sorry” for what
happened. Why should the state and federal culprits be treated any differently
– get off scot free – after causing far worse environmental damage?
Before the blowout, the Gold
King Mine was leaking 206 gallons of acidic, metals-laden but mostly clear
water per minute in 2010, 140 gpm in 2011, 13 in August 2014 and 112 in
September 2014, just before EPA first began working at the mine portal. On
August 5, 2015, it flash-flooded more than 3,000,000 gallons of turmeric-orange,
toxic-sludge-laden pollution.
The mine is now leaking 500-900
gallons per minute: 720,000 to 1,300,000 gallons per day – a huge increase in
pollution into these important waterways. Until winter set in, most of it was
finally being treated before entering Cement Creek, the Animas River and
downstream waters.
So we must ask, what was the
emergency that “forced” the EPA and DRMS to return to Gold King, demand
immediate access to the site – and proceed in such a hasty, negligent manner?
Unfortunately, this incident and the whitewashing that followed is too typical
of government agencies that have become increasingly dictatorial,
unaccountable, and dismissive of other interests, outside expertise, and
people’s needs for jobs, minerals, energy and quality living standards.
Today, throughout the Rocky
Mountain region, waters are still polluted by metals and minerals that are
present in underground mines … along with the gold and silver that have long
drawn prospectors, created jobs, and built state and local economies.
Hopefully, effluents from all these abandoned mines will soon be minimized via
practical, efficient, low-maintenance treatment systems, under legal regimes
that do not assign unlimited liability to private sector entities that try to
fix these problems.
That will greatly improve water
quality in many streams – while suggestions presented in EPA’s otherwise shoddy
internal review could do much to prevent a repeat of Gold King, if they are
followed.
Meanwhile, Congress and
state legislatures should further investigate the Gold King disaster, and
compel witnesses to testify under oath. They should also improve relevant laws,
ensure that agency personnel are truly qualified to do their tasks, and hold
agency incompetents and miscreants accountable.
Paul Driessen is senior policy
analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org)
and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power - Black
death.
No comments:
Post a Comment