October
1, 2015
MEDIA
CONTACT
Maurice
A . Thompson
(614)
340-9817
Federal
Court: Cities' Rental Licensing and Inspection Requirements Unconstitutional
Fourth
Amendment secures property rights of landlords from unlawful searches and
occupational licensing regulations in Ohio and nationwide
Columbus,
OH - The Southern District of Ohio today ruled that the City of Portsmouth's
occupational licensing requirements imposed upon landlords - - rental property
inspections and licensing fees - - violates the Fourth Amendment to the United
State Constitution.
The
1851 Center for Constitutional Law's victory on behalf of Portsmouth rental
property owners Ron Baker, Nancy Ross, Thomas Howard, and Darren Oliver means
that indiscriminate and warrantless government inspections of rental properties
are unconstitutional nationwide, and that unlawfully-extracted "rental
inspection fees" must be returned to the rental property owners who paid
them.
These
property owners had long rented their property in Portsmouth without license or
inspections, and their properties had never been the subject of complaint by
tenants, neighbors, or others. However, the City threatened to criminally
prosecute and even imprison these landlords if they continued to rent their
homes without first submitting to an unconstitutional warrantless search of the
entire interior and exterior of these homes.
Judge
Susan Dlott, of the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio, held as
follows:
"[T]he
Court finds that the Portsmouth [Rental Dwelling Code] violates the Fourth
Amendment insofar as it authorizes warrantless administrative inspections. It
is undisputed that the [Rental Dwelling Code] affords no warrant procedure or
other mechanism for precompliance review . . . the owners and/or tenants of
rental properties in Portsmouth are thus faced with the choice of consenting to
the warrantless inspection or facing criminal charges, a result the Supreme
Court has expressly disavowed under the Fourth Amendment."
"The
inspections are also significantly intrusive. As the Supreme Court has noted,
the 'physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of
the Fourth Amendment is directed.'"
"The
search inspection sheet details eighty items to be inspected throughout the
entirety of the rental property. The Court thus concludes that the intrusion is
significant."
"Taking
into account the above factors-the significant expectation of privacy, the
substantial intrusion into the home, and the inefficacy of the warrantless
inspections on the proffered special need-the Court finds the warrantless
inspections are unreasonable."
"Having
determined that the Code is not saved by special needs or the closely regulated
industry exceptions, the Court concludes that the Code's failure to include a
warrant provision violates the Fourth Amendment."
Both
the United States and Ohio Supreme Court have invalidated warrantless
inspections of rental property, and repeatedly held that warrantless
administrative inspections of business property are generally invalid, absent
exigent circumstances.
Nevertheless,
Ohio cities had vigorously sought to collect licensing fees from area
landlords, and the warrantless searches served as the lynchpin to each of these
goals. Ordinances such as Portsmouth's Rental Dwelling Code established an
absolute prohibition on renting out property within a community - - even though
the landlord may have long done so and even though his or her property may be
in pristine condition - - without a government-approved license that cannot be
acquired without first paying a $100 annual fee per rental home and submitting
to an open-ended warrantless search of every area of the property, inside and
out.
"The
Federal Court's ruling yesterday is a victory for all property owners and
tenants. Local government agents do not have unlimited authority to force
entry into Ohioans' homes or businesses. To the contrary 'houses' are one of
the types of property specifically mentioned by the Fourth Amendment; and
Ohioans have a moral and constitutional right to exclude others, even government
agents, from their property. Entry requires either a warrant or an emergency,
and neither is present with respect to these suspicion-less rental
inspections," said Maurice Thompson, Executive Director of the 1851
Center.
"Government
inspections of one's home frequently results in arbitrary orders to make
thousands of dollars worth of untenable improvements to even the most
well-maintained properties. These enactments were nothing more than a set of
back-door tactics to collect revenue on the backs of Ohio property owners,
while attempting to chase 'the wrong type of owners' out of town."
Read
the Federal Court's Order HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment