Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Monday, October 12, 2015

Sage Grouse, Deserters & Such

By Jim Beers

Below these brief observations appears two news items:

Number 1 is a link to a Federal Register Notice describing a rejection by the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of the detailed and justifiable appeal from the Governors of Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota and Utah for the federal government to stop any further attempts to subvert state authority, Constitutional property rights and land closures based on the specious claims of sage grouse status. State governments recently presented lengthy and detailed descriptions about the status, state programs and private property management efforts to manage and maintain sage grouse. The federal government’s own US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was unaware of these activities and found without question that the current state management of THEIR (state) wildlife to be more than adequate in this regard and the status of these birds to be healthy. Despite this, the BLM declared their intention to close 10 Million acres to mineral development. The Federal Register is purposely difficult to understand but the arrogant and dismissive tone of federal bureaucrats toward elected Governors and State Constitutional jurisdictions is unmistakable.

Number 2 is the actual Proposal to close 10 Million acres to mining based on “USFWS findings that mining causes sage grouse ‘habitat fragmentation.’”

Thus; no matter the status of any animal under state jurisdiction, no matter what state governments do in cooperation with local landowners, no matter what one agency tells you, no matter that two federal agencies under the same appointee say and do diametrically opposed things, and no matter that the steady closure of public lands to any natural resource use from logging and grazing to hunting and fish & wildlife management and access resulting in catastrophic fires; the federal government’s avowed and apparent goal is the destruction and conquest of rural America from residences and towns to small businesses and human benefit.

The Declaration of Independence described this sort of government abuse as a cause for war, and the US Constitution was designed to prevent it. Our prosperity and laziness brought about the current situation and cowardice and self-interest have allowed it to fester into what we have today.

This is the classic old good-cop/bad-cop routine. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) says that “listing the greater sage-grouse is not warranted at this time.” Because proclaimed primary threats to sage grouse were found to be non-existent due to state, and local conservation efforts and the American public is told by the media, “see how nice and smart and respectful of Governors, State Agencies, hunters, ranchers and other rural people those nice people at USFWS are? Don’t listen to those nasty extremists that say they are not to be trusted and they will eventually create new authorities and controls (along with EPA and the rest of the Washington alphabet of bureaucracies) over all of Rural America.”

Then along comes the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), a sister agency in the Department of the Interior proposing to “withdraw from mineral location and entry federal lands identified as “sagebrush focal areas” in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming” but not to worry, no big deal since “The proposed withdrawal area covers (ONLY) approximately 10 million acres.” Both agencies are under the lady Secretary of the Interior (an appointee of the guy in the White House). She is known as an outdoor supply executive and fervent environmentalist.

Truth be told, the Secretary, the Director of BLM and the Director of USFWS (who incidentally was responsible for the $45 to 60 Million in State Wildlife Funds stolen in the mid 1990’s by USFWS to introduce wolves and open a California Liaison Office for Radicals – both of which Congress had refused to authorize or fund) are no more to be trusted or respected than that old lady at EPA that claims jurisdiction over all waters (and watersheds) of the US.

This is particularly galling at this moment since I just heard (on a Sunday morning newscast no less) that Army deserter Bergdahl will be released (with a bonus or scholarship or Rose Garden ceremony no doubt but that went unsaid.) Are there any less attentive moments for horrendous, scandalous news like this than an American’s week on Sunday morning?
 
Perhaps his folks should be given another Rose Garden ceremony and Mrs. Bergdahl given another back rub by the President like Biden Gave Ashton Carter’s wife while Ashton was sworn in as Secretary of Defense? Those disgraceful Army Generals that did the bidding of the White House regarding Bergdahl violated laws, military justice and the ancient and proven rules of military necessity. May they all live in infamy. That this happens on the heels of the release of those 5 Islamic Radical/Extremist/Killers that are already getting back on the battlefield after being traded for a deserter only makes this federal legacy even more notorious and disgusting. At the very least Bergdahl deserved the fate of Army Lieutenant Phillip Nolan in the 1863 Civil War classic The Man Without a Country by Edward Everett Hale, and those Moslem Killers deserved only to be buried in Guantanamo.

Sage grouse, rural American business, the USA economy and the USA national defense/foreign policy are reminiscent of the “tooth of wolf”, “lizard’s leg and owlet wing”, “eye of newt” and “baboon’s blood” that the three witches stirred in their cauldron as they foretold Shakespeare’s Macbeth’s future that he failed to understand at his own peril and to his own destruction. By describing the Macbeth witches in this manner, Shakespeare was asking an age-old question: are our lives already mapped out for us or do we have a hand in what happens to us? At the end of the play the audience is forced to consider the extent to which the characters have control over their own lives. President Obama, his appointees and self-serving bureaucrats are our current three witches brewing a cauldron of rot and telling us that rot will lead the way to goodness. They are phonies just like those three witches in Macbeth and unlike Shakespeare’s audience we know the right answer because we once had control over our own lives. We know that by disregarding our three witches we can once again assume the responsibility for and control of our own lives as well as the fruits of our own actions within the freedoms and rights we once enjoyed. Shakespeare posed the right question and thus far we have refused to recognize the right answer.



On September 24, 2015, the federal Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) published a Notice of Proposed Withdrawal (“BLM notice”), proposing to withdraw from mineral location and entry federal lands identified as “sagebrush focal areas” in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. The BLM notice commences a two-year temporary segregation period, prohibiting location and entry of new mining claims on BLM and U.S. Forest Service lands in these sagebrush focal areas. If the BLM decides to withdraw the area at the end of the segregation period, the withdrawal will last up to 20 years, but could be extended in the future. The proposed withdrawal area covers approximately 10 million acres.

The BLM’s proposal aims to protect the greater sage-grouse and its habitat from adverse effects of mineral exploration and mining. The BLM issued the proposed withdrawal in conjunction with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) announcement that the greater sage-grouse does not need protection under the Endangered Species Act. In support of its determination, the USFWS stated that “listing the greater sage-grouse is not warranted at this time” because its primary threats were reduced by federal, state, and local conservation efforts. This proposed withdrawal is one of those efforts.

According to the BLM’s Fact Sheet, the USFWS has identified hardrock mining as a threat to the sage-grouse because mining can cause habitat fragmentation. During the two-year segregation period, the BLM will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement to study the long-term impacts of the proposed withdrawal on sagebrush habitat. The BLM is accepting public comments until December 23, 2015.  (Excerpt) Read more at westernminingalliance.org ...
 
_______________________________
If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.

Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC. He also served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in the Aleutian Islands. He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC. He testified three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority. He resides in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.

Jim Beers is available to speak or for consulting. You can receive future articles by sending a request with your e-mail address to: jimbeers7@comcast.net

No comments:

Post a Comment