A special counsel report ordered by the governor of Alaska over an armed "raid" last year on Alaska miners found that the EPA-led investigation unnecessarily exposed the mining families to harm -- but also did not find any evidence that task force members broke any laws......The report, released Thursday, said the EPA failed to provide witnesses and documents to the special counsel in charge of the investigation. The special counsel report also shows the EPA went forward with the raid, even though the Alaska Department of Public Safety had investigated the criminal concerns a year earlier and “found [them] to be without merit.”
"Imagine coming up to your diggings, only to see agents swarming over it like ants, wearing full body armor, with jackets that say "POLICE" emblazoned on them, and all packing side arms,” ......At the time, a spokesman for the EPA did not deny that agents wore body armor and carried guns, but said it was not a "raid."....To Read More
My Take - Once again
the claim is made that an out of control federal agency "didn't break the law".
The problem is the courts have had difficulty deciding whether it's the Constitution
that is the "law", or laws passed by the Congress that have usurped the "unalienable rights" as outlined in the Constitution, and further usurped
and interpreted far beyond the Congresses intent by these agencies, and the courts via lawsuits - lawsuits these
agencies refuse to properly fight - is the "law"!
No comments:
Post a Comment