President Trump's budget guidance sought to cut $1.6 billion from the Environmental Protection Agency's $8.1 billion expectation. Shrieks of looming Armageddon prompted Congress to fund EPA in full until September 2017, when the battle will be joined again.
Then EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said he would prioritize Superfund cleanups based on toxicity, health-impact and other factors. The ensuing caterwauling suggested that EPA had no priorities since Bill Ruckelshaus (EPA's first administrator, 1970-1975). But consider some standard EPA practices:
1. EPA advocates claim the US is unhealthy and dirty........
2. Eco-militants at EPA tricked the Supreme Court.........
4. EPA knowingly relies on fake science..........
5. EPA colludes with professional environmentalists to "fix" "inadequate" draft regulations.......
6. EPA covers up crimes. .....
President Trump's budget guidance exposed decades-old EPA abuses. The evidence exposes EPA's lack of mission, commitment and integrity. If EPA would use honest, evidence-based science to protect the nation's health, it would be a welcome and long overdue change - perhaps a miracle.
What's your bet?.......To Read More....
1. EPA advocates claim the US is unhealthy and dirty........
2. Eco-militants at EPA tricked the Supreme Court.........
4. EPA knowingly relies on fake science..........
5. EPA colludes with professional environmentalists to "fix" "inadequate" draft regulations.......
6. EPA covers up crimes. .....
President Trump's budget guidance exposed decades-old EPA abuses. The evidence exposes EPA's lack of mission, commitment and integrity. If EPA would use honest, evidence-based science to protect the nation's health, it would be a welcome and long overdue change - perhaps a miracle.
What's your bet?.......To Read More....
No comments:
Post a Comment