Link to: Access to mid-Atlantic energy resources advances long-term energy security
At the end of
January, the Obama administration announced the next step in a long process
that could result in the exploration and ultimate extraction of oil-and-gas
resources of the U.S. mid-Atlantic—something the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
Governors Coalition supports. On March 30, the 60-day comment period ends. If
everything goes well, we could see new American resources on the market in
twenty years.
With the current
oil oversupply, it may seem like an odd time to be going after more. However,
the legal wheels that could allow limited access to the vast, untapped oil
resources move very slowly. Today’s market conditions will fluctuate up and
down many times between now and 2035 when the global demand for energy is
expected to spike. Not to mention the increasingly volatile situation taking
place right now in the Middle East, where new coalitions are already being
formed: Iran and Iraq, Saudi Arabia and South Korea—just to name two. If one
more beheading takes place or a bomb hits the right (or wrong) target, the
region could erupt, and the entire energy dynamic would change. Considering the
variables, American energy security is always something worth pursuing.
The planning for the
2017-2022 OCS leasing program began June 2014, when the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management (BOEM) issued a request for information and comments. Then, in
January, it published the Draft Proposed Plan; the Final Proposed Plan is
anticipated in Q4 2016 or Q1 2017, with it probably taking effect in Q2/Q3
2017. The 2017-2022 plan proposes just one mid-Atlantic lease sale six years
from now—and even its future is precarious. The mid-Atlantic currently has no
leases in federal waters.
Explaining the
process, Offshore magazine writes: “The OCS Lands Act
requires the Secretary of the Interior to prepare a five-year program that
includes a schedule of potential oil and gas lease sales and indicates the
size, timing and location of proposed leasing activity as determined to best
meet national energy needs, while addressing a range of economic, environmental
and social considerations.”
BOEM estimates that the entire U.S. OCS holds
approximately 90 billion barrels of oil and more than 400 trillion cubic feet
of natural gas which are technically recoverable. Based on 30 to 40 year old
data, it estimates that the mid-Atlantic OCS may contain approximately 8-9
billion barrels of oil equivalent—which at current consumption rates would be
enough to meet South Carolina’s needs for 67 years. New seismic and other
geological and geophysical surveys are needed. Modern practices and
technologies will provide a more comprehensive view that will help make
informed decisions on using the resources.
While the proposal
for possible mid-Atlantic development faces opposition from environmental
lobbyists, who call it a gift to
oil-and-gas interests and an anchor to the “dirty fossil fuels of the past,” it
enjoys a favorable political climate in the affected coastal states, where polls show citizens support
offshore drilling.
When the January
announcement came out, North Carolina’s Republican Governor Pat McCory,
chairman of the OCS Governors Coalition, applauded the proposal:
“Responsible exploration and development of oil and gas reserves off our coast
would create thousands of good paying jobs, spur activity in a host of
associated industries, generate billions of dollars in tax revenue and move
America closer to energy independence.” Even Virginia’s Democrat Senators say the proposal is a
“significant step … that should result in safe, responsible development of
energy resources off the Virginia and mid-Atlantic coasts.”
Both the senators
and governors want to see legislation passed that would provide for the same
type of revenue-sharing system currently applied to the Gulf States to
compensate local communities for additional infrastructure, environmental
protection, and other coastal management needs generated by the new economic
activity. If Congress allows revenue sharing, Brydon Ross, Southeast director
of the Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA), predicts: it “could generate
more than $10 billion in revenue combined for critical public budget infusions
without taxpayer dollars.”
Unfortunately, even though it is included in the draft proposal and is
supported by lawmakers in the impacted states, future mid-Atlantic resource
development is not a sure thing. The Washington Post (WP) calls the plan:
“politically fraught.” Jeremy Kennedy, an attorney who focuses on domestic- and
international-energy transactions, says: “The planning, review
and adoption of the 2017-2022 leasing program is, at its core, a political
process.”
“This is a political plan,” Randall Luthi, president of the National
Ocean Industries Association, stated: “not a plan based
on science and resource data”—though he acknowledged it “is a small step in the
right direction.” Luthi added: “Our members are encouraged by the decision to
further analyze the mid- and south-Atlantic areas, which have not been included
in a leasing program for over two generations.”
The 2017-2022 five-year plan is still in the early stages. Addressing
the ongoing process, Kennedy explains: “Each of the steps … will winnow the
scope of the 2017-2022 leasing program.” The WP reports: BOEM “could decide to
narrow—but not expand—the proposed leasing area before it is finalized.”
Kennedy sees that “little is certain at this time.” After all, the Obama
administration has killed previous potential lease sales. “Once published,” he
states, “planned lease sales can always be cancelled or delayed by the Interior
Department, president or Congress.”
Will the U.S. pursue development of our own offshore oil-and-natural gas
resources in the Atlantic, as Canada, Cuba, the Bahamas, and South American
Atlantic-coast countries are doing? No one really knows—but we should.
Supporters of American energy security need to get involved in the “political
process” by making our voices heard. Add your public comment before the March
30 deadline. Tell BOEM: “America can balance energy production with
environmental protection.” Let Interior Secretary Sally Jewell know that you
support “Greater access to our bountiful energy resources and advancing
long-term energy security, while growing our coastal communities.”
The CEA has a customizable letter to make
it easy for you to “act now!” The author of Energy Freedom,
Marita Noon serves as the executive director for Energy Makes America Great Inc. and the
companion educational organization, the Citizens’ Alliance for Responsible Energy
(CARE). She hosts a weekly radio program: America’s Voice for Energy—which
expands on the content of her weekly column.
No comments:
Post a Comment