There is one more thing. One of the things I see constantly from the left when they are promoting some government scheme or other is that it is being done "for the children". My question is this; if they really are so concerned about the children why isn't the left screaming to high heaven over this? I also have to ask this; who is the party defending that is supposedly "for the children"?
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Mark Thompson: From Pedophile Cover-Up to the New York Times
As Great Britain is engulfed with “paedogeddon” did England, perhaps, just export a modern Mad King George to the American Colonies? Is it hoped that Americans, slammed by Sandy, enamored by the British accent, may embrace a man who participated in the media cover-up of a serial child rapist, as a legal letter sent to Thompson ten days before he left BBC may suggest? On the same day Thompson landed on New York’s shores, Australia’s Prime Minister announced a nation-wide inquiry into the systematic child sex abuse by children charities, police, churches, and child protective services. This was prompted by aforementioned Det. Peter Fox. Paedogeddon is real. Not just in England or Australia but in America as well where high-powered political pedophile rings are destroying our children.
As Suzanne Moore of The Guardian writes “children have been screaming into a void” for far too long.
Courage is required to speak truth-to-power about child sex trafficking as British MP Tom Watson and Australian Det. Peter Fox have done. Gutsy editors and journalists are needed to work with whistle-blowing police and politicians.
My Take - I found this article to be more than just a little disturbing, espeically when the phrase "high powered poliical pediphile rings are desroy our children" and that "children have been screaming into a void for far too long". How can decent person read that and not have it stab you in the heart. As I read this I remembered an article I read over 30 years ago claiming that there was a vast underground net of pedophiles, pornographers and homosexuals promoting laws that would legalize child sexual abuse. One homosexual pedophile claimed that it was wrong to punish them because they were the ones who "really loved children", and there is even an open organization that promotes this called North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). Their stated goals:
"NAMBLA's website states that it is a political, civil rights, and educational organization whose goal is to end "the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships."
According to the NAMBLA, some of the organization's primary positions are:
· Supporting and promoting man/boy relationships: they hold that when consensual these relationships are not harmful or child sexual abuse. One study they cite is the controversial Rind et al. paper.
· Age-of-consent reform: what NAMBLA describes as "empowerment of youth in all areas, not just the sexual."
It is clear that this is a problem that permeates society and very high levels. And we wonder how laws and regulations came into existence turning all these moral issues into “civil rights” issues. That is nothing more than an attempt to confuse the minds of the general public….and it is working.
Is it any wonder that we see moral disintegration permeating society? Is it any wonder that society has become confused on all other moral issues when society can't take an absolute and definitive stand on something that is as morally foundational as this? Is it any wonder that society has become morally confused when all those who should be openly condemning these things may be part of the problem?
When the religious community, the legal community, the political community and the economically powerful are part of the problem what is humanity to do? This article is disturbing at so many levels it offends the conscience and breaks our hearts.