Is Zohran Mamdani Really the Anointed One? Part II

By Rich Kozlovich

I have huge draft files saving links to articles on every issue that faces humanity, so, from the beginning of the Democrat primary for Mayor of NYC I started saving articles dealing with that as it was clear this was going to be controversial.  So, on June 27 I organized those articles and published this piece asking Is Zohran Mamdani Really the Anointed One?  I used so many sources I thought it was so comprehensive I wouldn't have to address this again.  Wrong!

Almost immediately I had to add updates.   Starting with Andrea Widburg, who has really been on top of this story.  By that afternoon she published this article, A story out of Iowa explains why college grads were instrumental in Mamdani’s NYC victory, noting his votes came from the "college crowd, .....the barista class .....the academic haven for aberrant people to engage in endless leftist mental masturbation".   But they only represented 5% of the voting population of NYC.  Which lent credibility to the idea the other 95% of New York  City voters may not choose this carpetbagger from Uganda. 

Daniel Greenfield has been dubious over this vote from the beginning and addresses his concerns in this article,  Tens of Thousands of “New Voters” Registered to Vote for Mamdani, noting it was to his benefit the voter turn out was small, but also his campaign focused on registering new voters, thousands of new voters, or lapsed voters.  Greenfield says the numbers are unnatural.  Where do all these 18-25 year olds come from?  The data suggest they're immigrants from Muslim nations as “roughly a third of all Muslim adults are under the age of 30”.  He ends by asking:

Beyond fraud and numbers like these absolutely raise that question, we are seeing a test of the system that Islamists used to swamp elections in the UK. We may want to wake up before it starts happening on a large scale here.

It would appear he's also being funded by the Shadowy David Hogg PAC, which "appears to be a communist organization that is recruiting young voters to further Marxism."   The story got worse as the days progressed.  

 

He wants to raise taxes on white people.  He wants to ban all guns, an ideological concept he seems to think shouldn't apply to terrorists. He says billionaires shouldn't exist.  Yet these are the ones he plans to tax heavily in order to give a lot of free stuff away, which might be difficult after they all leave New York.   He's positioned himself in the past to defunding the police, and to emptying the city's jails, which he seems to be flip flopping on now, at least until he can get elected, but the NYPD cops aren't buying it, and if he's elected they're planning on a mass exodus.

 

He's a communist Islamist.  Does  anyone beside be see how incongruous that is?  Yet there it is, he's a communist, but what kind of Islamist is he?  Radical, and he's even scared leftists.  The Washington Post slams him, and the Democrat leader in the House, Hakeem Jeffries, isn't endorsing him.

 

One of the most interesting aspects of this whole thing is pointed out in this RAIR article noting that New York City has seemingly forgotten the horrors of 9/11 and is willing to elect a communist who's a supporter of radical Islamists as their mayor.  Dems' NYC socialist nominee ducks and weaves when asked to condemn term calling for killing Jews

 

What could possibly go wrong?