Mike Adams, who publishes Natural News and styles himself as the Health
Ranger recently posted an article entitled, The Agricultural Holocaust explained: the 10 worst ways GMOs
threaten humanity and our natural world on July 27, 2014.
He claims "genetically modified organisms (GMOs)
a serious threat to humanity and the environment? The reasons span the realms
of science, social justice, economics and the environment, and once you
understand this, you'll readily understand why so many environmentalists,
humanitarians, responsible scientists and social justice advocates are strongly
opposed to GMOs", and lists ten reasons why?
GM corn is genetically
engineered to develop a deadly pesticide in every grain of corn. When this corn
is harvested and turned into Corn Flakes, corn tortillas, corn syrup or other
corn-based foods, that same poison remains in the corn.
What is the effect of human children eating all the poisons grown in GM corn? Nobody knows for sure because the tests haven't been conducted on human consumption. That's why GMOs remain an untested experiment that exploits humans as guinea pigs.
What is the effect of human children eating all the poisons grown in GM corn? Nobody knows for sure because the tests haven't been conducted on human consumption. That's why GMOs remain an untested experiment that exploits humans as guinea pigs.
First of all,
this “deadly” pesticide isn’t deadly to anything except the targeted insect
pests because it's the dose that makes the poison – basic chemical science! When they use
this kind of language it’s a lie of omission, because presence doesn’t mean
toxicity, and they know it. Furthermore it’s more likely that cooking will
destroy what minute amounts exist in it anyway but even if it didn't just because some chemical is detectable it
doesn’t mean it’s harmful. We can test
down for parts per quadrillion and even lower in some cases. As a health issue those numbers are meaningless
because the molecular load will be so small cells won’t react to it.
As for "no tests
being conducted on human beings", there’s a reason for that. We’re not allowed
to test human beings, and these eco-activists know it, yet they continue to use this
same lie of omission over and over again. In the real world everything - and I
mean everything - gets its final testing when its released to the public, and
GMO’s have been used for decades in this country without one iota of evidence
of harm.
What they fail to tell you – making
another lie of omission – are the benefits of GMO’s, including less total land
needed to plant the needed food to feed a growing world population, less
pesticide use (including herbicides) because they’re now more resistant to
insect pests and weeds, and can even allow for planting in soil that has high
levels of salt, expanding usable acreage numbers substantially. Since the
plants are healthier because they're disease resistant, all of this allows for higher
better quality yields.
Without modern
agricultural tools, including GMO’s, according to Norman Borlaug 25 years ago, we would need
all the land east of the Mississippi with the exclusion of three states to generate
the same level of crop production they had then. With the world's growing population how much more land would be needed. Picture that as a worldwide dilemma.
This will be a
ten part series.
No comments:
Post a Comment