By Rich Kozlovich
The justice system in America is in serious need of fixing. Radical prosecutors and judges are destroying the very concept of justice by their actions. One criminal thug committed a murder in less that two hours of being released on bail from other crimes.
One judge decided parents who starved their baby to death didn't deserve jail time. The New Mexico Supreme Court tosses bodycam confession in newborn hiding case. The deranged killer of a six year old child is being released.... again!
|
Exantus broke into the Tipton family’s Versailles home on December 7, 2015, stabbed Logan Tipton to death as he slept and also attacked Dean and Logan’s sisters. He did not know the family prior to the attack.
He was found "not guilty by reason of insanity" for the murder, but found him "guilty but mentally ill on assault charges against the other family members", and was sentenced to 20 years. Does that really make any sense? And now after only serving half his term, he's being released on parole because he was a good little boy in prison.
In Vermont a seventeen year old "juvenile" 25 years go murdered a married couple, two Dartmouth college professors, is now getting a shot ar parole because the Supreme Court ruled life sentences for juveniles is unconstitutional.
A convicted transgender "strangled an eleven month old baby, and was only sentenced to 55 years. This ... at least in my view... bodes well the need to ask and answer a few questions:
- What kind of monster murders an eleven month old baby?
- What kind of judge would only sentence him to 55 years?
- What kind of bleeding heart nitwits paroled this monster who continues to demonstrate he's mentally deranged insisting he's really a woman and is "demanding taxpayer-funded “gender-affirming” surgery", and an Obama judge agreed.
He also sued President Trump for hurtful transgender speech. Amazing, let's see if I understand this correctly. A man who could coldly strangle an eleven month old baby child to death has feelings? Did I get that right?
There's no end to the insanity. One serial rapist who is serving 167 years in prison has determined he's transsexual and is demanding the state pay for surgeries to confirm to his new identity, and that be sent to a woman's prison. Will that happen? I'm betting it will.
Free speech? Well, that depends if you say something one of the protected classes finds offensive. Shiloh Hendrix confronted a black boy who was obviously attempting to steal from her calling him a nigger, and when a bystander confronted her she told him what he could do with himself, that landed her two disorderly conduct charges from the city prosecutor, and was sentenced to "200 hours of community service and fined $1,000."
She was acquitted of one — the one regarding her interaction with the 8-year-old — and convicted of the other, which involved Omar, the videographer. Hendrix never put her hands on anyone, other than to hold her own child, and the only time she engaged another person was to retrieve her belongings and to tell a bystander to back off. Her only offense otherwise was to use a slur, which was, admittedly, the worst she could possibly use............
Public and private property is torched and looted in major cities if a drug addict ends up dead while resisting arrest — so long as he’s black. But a white woman who uses a slur after having her things stolen is nearly locked up for three months. That’s the Democrat version of American justice.
The guy who filmed her was an immigrant Somali bystander named Omar who told "Hendrix that her speech was “hate speech” and that he would post the video for the world to see." Interesting moral code Omar has. Hate speech is criminal, but rape is okay.
Omar was charged in 2022 for allegedly raping and sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl. The charges against him were later dismissed “in the interest of justice.
Let me see if I understand that. In the "interest of justice" rape is fine, but telling someone off in a colorful term is such a criminal act it demands some form of punishment? Did I get that right? Well, yes, you see it appears the Judge this case ", Christa Daily, has a history of granting outrageous plea deals and letting convicted sex offenders off with light punishments and little to no jail time."
It also appears Hendrix is appealing this ruling, because whether you approve of her conduct or not is immaterial, that's a red herring fallacy. The issue is freed speech. The fact is this standard of "justice" means Shiloh Hendrix won’t be the last victim of the left's efforts to criminalize speech.
A federal judge has ordered ICE to release a man with a notorious past, that I think can only be called a terrorist past, throwing Molotov Cocktails at the homes of Israeli solders in 1989, convicted of weapons violations 1995 and "lying on his immigration paperwork.". For reasons I find mind boggling he's been living here for 33 years, and is considered a respected leader in his Muslim community. CAIR's position?
“No one should be punished for their faith, advocacy, or identity. We urge ICE to immediately comply with the judge’s order, reunite Mr. Sarsour with his loved ones, and end the disturbing pattern of targeting Muslim, Palestinian, and other community members for detention and intimidation,” Awad said. “This case is a reminder that due process, human dignity, and constitutional rights must never be optional.”
I think that's really profound.. .don't you? Especially so since in Muslim controlled nations inequality before the law is part and parcel of The Mohammunist Manifesto.
Update:
- Biden Parole Migrant Accused of Raping 2 Women in Salt Lake City, Utah - An illegal alien, paroled into the United States by the Biden administration, is now accused of raping two women in Salt Lake City, Utah. Moise Sainteran, an illegal alien from Haiti, has been arrested by the Salt Lake City Police Department and charged with two counts of rape, forcible sexual abuse, object rape, aggravated sexual assault, and forcible sodomy.......
If you notice no one in the Trump administration seems to be panicking. No hysterics and emotionally ineffective hyperventilating, so, I’m of the opinion Trump and Co. knew this was going to happen, perhaps hoping it would happen, setting the judiciary up for a Constitutional confrontation. The federal judiciary has been a loose cannon since the 1803 Marbury v. Madison ruling, and now it’s almost completely out of control, and to the point the general public is seeing them for who and what they are, and the public doesn’t like it, many fearing the courts threaten the existence of the Republic.
The Constitution says the Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, not the judiciary
This is the opportunity to push Congress to exercise their Constitutional authority to start restricting the federal judiciary’s activist judges, and more importantly pass a Constitutional Amendment that does two things. Ends lifetime appointments, and do what the founders failed to do…. define the role of the judiciary, and with consequences for failing to stay within the boundaries of those definitions. And any Constitutional Amendment that fixes this should include a provision that all federal judges must be natural born citizens.
As I stated, the only court the Constitution creates is the Supreme Court, and when you read about how this came about it almost seems like it was an after thought to most of them. Clearly lacking insight and vision.
The idea behind lifetime appointments was to ensure their independence and not be impacted by politics. That has been an abject failure almost from the beginning, and in the last 100 years it’s been a dismal failure, one that’s been tolerated by the Congress.
When the founders put this in the Constitution those who opposed it warned the very things we’re seeing right now was going to happen, and they were right, as people will always be people, and people need boundaries to hold them in check.
The federal judiciary after the Supreme Courts Marbury v. Madison decision in 1803 has morphed into an almost entirely political institution that just occasionally rules harmoniously with the Constitution.
The federal judiciary is filled with political hacks, and if you ever watched some of the judiciary hearings for those who are nominated, especially when Senator John Kennedy is questioning them, you can easily conclude most of them are not the brightest pebbles in the brook, and they're dishonest.
There's a nautical phrase, "may you have follows seas", which means may the waves move in the same direction as the ship, and I'm of the opinion that's what will be happening in the federal judiciary. Not for all, because some are blatantly corrupt and incompetent ideologues, and we can't replace them without their consent. That needs to be changed.Everyone on the left is relying on the courts to ignore the Constitution to stop Trump’s “restoration to normality”, and this is the hill conservatives need to die on by challenging the myth of judicial supremacy, and better yet....again pass a Constitutional Amendment to fix the founder’s greatest Constitutional error; lifetime appointments for the federal judiciary.
The Constitution says the supreme commander of America's military is the President of the United States. The judiciary thinks they are!
If the President of the United States appoints someone to undertake some task, that's his right and responsibility under Article II of the Constitution, and this argument these DOGE employees don't have the proper security clearances is horsepucky. The intimate authority on security clearances is the President of the United states. If says their cleared, they're cleared, and he doesn't need confirmation or permission from the FBI or anyone else. Most assuredly he doesn't need permission from the federal judiciary.
DOGE has exposed amazing levels of waste, and the corruption by the Administrative State is so bad,it makes the 19th century’s patronage system look good. In spite of that the federal judiciary says none of that matters.