In 1954, on the Jewish holiday of Purim, a bus carrying passengers from the Red Sea beach town of Eilat entered Scorpions Pass.
The PLO would not be founded until 1964. An account in Time Magazine made no mention of ‘Palestinians’ because no such people had been invented yet. The West Bank and Gaza, the territories at the heart of the two-state solution and the ‘Palestinian’ cause, had been seized by Jordan and Egypt, and were being used as the bases from which the Islamic terrorists operated.
Nor
had Islamic terrorism entered the popular jargon. These Jihadis were
known as the ‘Fedayeen’ or those who die for Allah. Their style of
attacks closely resembled those perpetrated by Hamas on Oct 7. And the
Israelis had no high tech, no border wall and not nearly enough manpower
to come to grips with the constant Islamic Jihadist raids across the
border.
The Islamic attacks escalated under the cowardly
leadership of Moshe Sharett, Israel’s second prime minister, who had put
all his faith in international diplomacy and the United Nations.
After
the Scorpions Pass massacre, Sharett had refused to respond, arguing
that, “an act in reaction to the bloodbath would only blur the
horrifying effect and would place us on the same level as the murderers
on the other side.” Israeli commandos, who had little respect for
Sharett, a leftist hack with no understanding of the battlefield, began
to go rogue against the Jihadis.
Throughout the early 50s, Jihadis raided Israel from Gaza, killed and raped those they could, including Leah Festinger, a young Holocaust survivor, threw a grenade into a room where a family was sleeping, killing the children, including a 3-year-old girl. Meir Har Zion, a war hero who excelled at penetrating enemy territory, responded to the murder of his sister by making his way to the West Bank with a few friends and hunting down the men he believed were the killers.
Finally a murder near Nahal Oz, one of the communities targeted by Hamas in the Oct 7 massacre, brought the situation into clear focus. Roi Rotberg, a young man who was patrolling the fields, was ambushed, had his eyes gouged out and his mutilated body left on display.
Expecting
the international community to mediate peaceful borders had been tried
and it had failed. Egypt and Jordan were never held accountable for
Islamic terror raids, and only the Israeli responses to them were
condemned by the White House and the United Nations. The Eisenhower
administration had turned over its foreign policy to the oil industry
and Arabists like Assistant Secretary of State Henry Byroade whose true
allegiance was to Arab Muslim states.
And that was the setting
for what was just another funeral, until IDF Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan,
who knew Rotberg personally, delivered a famous eulogy that defined the new state of affairs.
Invoking
the story of the biblical figure Samson, who had carried away the gates
of Gaza on his shoulders from the Philistines, Dayan spoke of the small
community of Nahal Oz which “carries on its shoulders the heavy gates
of Gaza, beyond which hundreds of thousands of eyes and arms huddle
together and pray for the onset of our weakness so that they may tear us
to pieces”.
“It is to us that the blood of Roi calls from his
shredded body,” Dayan warned. “Although we have vowed a thousand vows
that our blood will never again be shed in vain — yesterday we were once
again seduced, brought to listen, to believe. Our reckoning with
ourselves, we shall make today. We mustn’t flinch from the hatred that
accompanies and fills the lives of hundreds of thousands of Arabs, who
live around us and are waiting for the moment when their hands may claim
our blood. We mustn’t avert our eyes, lest our hands be weakened. That
is the decree of our generation. That is the choice of our lives — to be
willing and armed, strong and unyielding, lest the sword be knocked
from our fists, and our lives severed.”
“Roi Rotberg, the thin
blond lad who left Tel Aviv in order to build his home alongside the
gates of Gaza, to serve as our wall. Roi — the light in his heart
blinded his eyes and he saw not the flash of the blade. The longing for
peace deafened his ears and he heard not the sound of the coiled
murderers. The gates of Gaza were too heavy for his shoulders, and they
crushed him.”
The gates of Gaza never became lighter except when
Israel won its wars. When Samson stayed strong, he prevailed, but when
he allowed himself to be seduced, he lost his sight and his strength,
and then in the extremity of his despair, he fought and died heroically.
In
every generation the gates of Gaza would grow heavy. As they eventually
would for Dayan whose tenure as Defense Minister ended when Golda
Meir’s government gave in to diplomacy and political pressure from
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and failed to strike first. The
resulting Yom Kippur War nearly destroyed Israel and began the end of
the Labor Party.
But the gates of Gaza also grew heavy on the
Netanyahu government and his predecessors, prime ministers Bennett and
Lapid, who focused once again on international diplomacy and building an
international coalition against Iran through the Abraham Accords to pay
attention.
Hamas appeared to have kept its word for two years
and Israel was once again blinded and forgot, as Dayan said that, “our
children shall not have lives to live if we do not dig shelters; and
without the barbed wire fence and the machine gun, we shall not pave a
path nor drill for water.”
Israeli leftists, convinced that the
Islamic Jihadists would settle for the West Bank and Gaza, the territory
beyond the ‘Green Line’, despised those Jews who lived there as
‘settlers’, messianic fanatics who were keeping up a state of war and
destroying any hope for a peaceful solution. And the Israeli right,
Sharon and Netanyahu, came to believe that walls were the answer. Barak
had pulled out of Lebanon and Sharon out of Gaza, ceding them to
Hezbollah and Hamas, but Netanyahu focused on Iran and domestic
economics, convinced that walls were enough.
The Simchat Torah
massacres showed that walls were not enough unless they were vigilantly
manned by men who truly understood, as Dayan said, that, “beyond the
furrow that marks the border, lies a surging sea of hatred and
vengeance, yearning for the day that the tranquility blunts our
alertness, for the day that we heed the ambassadors of conspiring
hypocrisy, who call for us to lay down our arms.”
On October 7 that day came and so did the killers yearning to “tear us to pieces”.
Samson
could carry the gates of Gaza, but what undid his strength was the need
to believe that the people he had been fighting for so long were just
like him and could become his friends and lovers. Before Samson’s eyes,
like those of Roi Rotberg, were gouged out, he had lost his moral
vision.
To live with the starkness of the vision that Dayan laid
out 67 years ago at a dusty gravesite near Gaza is too much for most
normal people. Samson could not do it and neither could any Israeli
leader, from Ben Gurion, who had to step in when Sharett failed, and to
Sharon, who had led the 50s retaliation raids against Muslim villages,
and to Netanyahu, who wanted to focus on geopolitics rather than the
dirty realities that lay before him in Gaza and the West Bank.
It
is easier for most to believe that some compromise must be possible, to
turn over Gaza and the West Bank, to develop joint economic projects,
to meet together as individuals, as one of the abducted women, a peace
activist, had tried to do, to deny a reality too horrific to be real.
By
the watchfires, sentries know not to look into the flame or they will
lose their night vision. Israelis, on the edge of hell, have to continue
to look into the abyss. Is it any wonder that so many find pretexts for
looking away, develop Stockholm Syndrome, turn on each other, or escape
into fantasies of coexistence, lay down the gates and let their enemies
cut their hair?
The gates of Gaza are not just here, they are everywhere that the horde on the other side lurks.
Civilization
is a set of borders that men once carved out of the wilderness. On one
side the village, on the other the wolf and the savage baying for blood.
The capitals of civilization have all been blinded. They hold up signs
welcoming refugees and wonder why bombs go off. They accept the
rationales, capitalism, colonialism, zionism and imperialism, for these
horrors, and convince themselves that this time they can trust Delilah…
because what is the alternative?
“We are tired of fighting; we
are tired of being courageous; we are tired of winning; we are tired of
defeating our enemies,” former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who finished
the retreat that turned over Hamas to Gaza, had told American
anti-Israel leftists at the Israel Policy Forum.
The gates of
Gaza weigh heavy on even the strongest of men, never mind the weakest of
them, who are tempted to put them down, and go to Delilah while
dreaming of peace. The moral resilience to bear the weight of the
struggle and resist the simplistic promises of a solution.
But
when we cease to see the enemy for what it is, then we lose the
knowledge of what is true. We let ourselves be tied down by our enemies
with promises of peace and love, but they only blind and mock us. The
Lord departs from us, the Philistines deface our monuments and kill us.
And then at long last we wake up, surrounded by blood and ruin, and the
knowledge that we must either perish, bear the gates of Gaza forever or
go to wage war against the Philistines.
Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This article previously appeared at the Center's Front Page Magazine. Click here to subscribe to my articles. And click here to support my work with a donation. Thank you for reading.
Tags: Hamas, Islamic terrorism, Israel, recent
No comments:
Post a Comment