By
Mark Steyn November 25, 2014
The
most interesting thing about today's hearing at the DC Court of Appeals was
that Michael E Mann was a no-show. In this interminable procedural bollocks now
well into its third year, he's supposedly the plaintiff - and yet in the last
two years he has shown up in court on precisely one occasion. Dr Mann is not
merely a fraud as a Nobel Laureate and a fraud as an octuply
"exonerated" scientist, he's a fraud as a plaintiff, too.
I
have learned over the years to have a particular contempt for serial litigants
who never show up for their own cases. One of the reasons I worked so hard in
Canada to get the Section 13 "hate speech" law repealed (which it now
is) was that over a 15-year period the plaintiff on every single case was a man
called Richard Warman. Yet he never once appeared in court - unlike the mostly
poor and unrepresented defendants. To reprise my old line, the process is the
punishment - and Warman was not a genuine plaintiff, but merely a man who
loosed the process upon others and then got on with his life while they were
ensnared in a time-consuming savings-draining nightmare…..To Read More…..
No comments:
Post a Comment