Since the Federalist Papers, America has debated “Energy in the Executive.” But President Obama’s
2014 agenda framed by his State of the Union address heralds a class warfare
agenda, one fusing an “income inequality” theme with federal industrial policy
and other activism.
“When I can act on my own without
Congress, I’m going to do so,” Obama promises. This
spend-and-transfer fixation makes Americans poorer and dependent except for the
lucky few running things.
Others have argued for federal budget rationality as
essential to any anti-poverty agenda. This series proposes a greater prosperity
enhancing opportunity, streamlining the nearly $2 trillion regulatory
state and ending the uncertainty, wealth destruction and job loss it creates.
To improve regulatory cost accountability, the 104th
Congress passed the Congressional Review Act (CRA). That law sets up a 60-day
period following agency publication of a regulation during which the rule will
not take effect. That 60-day pause affords Congress an opportunity, should it
desire, to pass a resolution of disapproval to halt the regulation.
It rarely has that desire. The CRA was a symbolic nod
toward congressional accountability for regulations. But it amounts to a 2/3
supermajority requirement to strike a law that Congress never made in the first
place when the president vetoes a disapproval resolution. And since Congress
benefits from delegation and no rollback reaches the president’s desk anyway,
the law doesn’t work. (Well, OK, the CRA did halt an
“ergonomics” rule, on repetitive motion injuries.)….To Read More…..
Also in “The Reining in the Executive Branch Bureaucracy” Series
Also in “The Reining in the Executive Branch Bureaucracy” Series
Part 1: Measure Regulatory Costs
Part 2: Regulatory Benefits? Maybe Not
Part 3: Make Regulations Transparent Like the Budget
Part 4: Put a Spotlight on Economically Significant Rules
Part 5: Categorize Regulations by Impact
Part 6: Deal With The Deadweight Cost Of Regulation
Part 7: Recognize and Reduce Indirect Costs of Regulation
Part 8: Create a Culture of Repealing Regulations
Part 2: Regulatory Benefits? Maybe Not
Part 3: Make Regulations Transparent Like the Budget
Part 4: Put a Spotlight on Economically Significant Rules
Part 5: Categorize Regulations by Impact
Part 6: Deal With The Deadweight Cost Of Regulation
Part 7: Recognize and Reduce Indirect Costs of Regulation
Part 8: Create a Culture of Repealing Regulations
My Take - All this is fine, but the real problem are the 16th and 17th amendments. Repeal those and all else will begin to fall into place. RK
No comments:
Post a Comment