Today, CEI filed comments against the IRS’s proposed rules restricting speech by
501(c)(4) groups (which the IRS has suggested could be expanded in the future
to also restrict speech by 501(c)(3) groups like think-tanks). Our comments
focus on the Treasury Department’s improper attempt to redefine non-partisan
criticism of non-elected government officials, including communications with
lawmakers about executive-branch and judicial nominations, as
“candidate-related political activity,” in order to restrict such activity by
501(c)(4) groups. We also discuss how the proposed rule would also
unconstitutionally restrict non-profits’ advice to the executive branch about
nominations. CEI also agrees with the Heritage
Foundation that the Treasury Department
lacks statutory
authority to impose the
proposed rules.
As I earlier noted in The Wall Street Journal,
"Those rules restrict even truthful,
nonpartisan criticism of IRS and bureaucratic wrongdoing by classifying it as
“candidate-related political activity.” For example, if an IRS official
subjects citizens to incredibly burdensome demands for irrelevant information
just to harass them for their political or religious beliefs, no 501(c)(4)
group could later criticize that official’s nomination to be IRS commissioner,
without engaging in restricted activity. That’s because the IRS’s proposed regulation
defines even unelected government officials, like agency heads and judges, as
“candidates” if they have been nominated for a position requiring Senate
confirmation. The IRS’s proposed rules are an attack on the First Amendment
that will make it easier for the government to get away with harassing
political dissenters and whistleblowers in the future.".....To Read More.....
No comments:
Post a Comment