While contemporary mythology has it otherwise, the market is not a distinct
phenomenon: it is what exists when people interact and otherwise voluntarily
transact with each other. The broad definition of the market is simply what
people (choose to) do when they are not forced to do otherwise. So it is not
surprising that even the Soviet Union, “despite” its anti-market rhetoric,
fundamentally relied on markets: foreign markets for prices to guide planners’ economic calculation, and domestic black
markets for resource allocation and goods distribution according to people’s
real needs and preferences. The black market, indeed, was “a major
structural feature” of the Soviet economy.
In other words, we should expect to see markets wherever governments fail.
Or, to put it more accurately, markets exist where government cannot
sufficiently repress or otherwise crowd out voluntary exchange.
So it should be no surprise that, as The Local
reports, Swedes en masse get private health care insurance on the side
of the failing welfare systems. This is indirectly a result of the relatively
vast liberalization of the Swedish economy over the course of the past 20 years
(as I have notedhereand
here), which has resulted in the
“experimental” privatization of several hospitals (even one emergency hospital is privately
owned). While previously only the political elite (primarily,
members of the Riksdag, the Swedish parliament) had access to private health
care through insurance, the country now sees a blossoming and healthy insurance
market...... To Read More......
No comments:
Post a Comment