Wednesday, March 14, 2012

The Birth Cirtificate Saga: Part 2

By Rich Kozlovich

When this whole thing started about three years ago or so I thought it was a load of horsepucky. I thought this whole thing was insane, after all, how could anyone be so stupid to think they could get away with something such as that? But no matter how much scorn was heaped on those who touted this business they just would not stop demanding to see all the information about Obama, including all of his student information. I turned out that his accessible history was at best lacking, and anyone who has access to anything else refused to share it. Why?

That isn't what happened when Bush ran for president and Dan Rather kept demanding more and more information? Every aspect of his life became the cause célèbre for the main stream media, and yet no matter how many questions were answered it was never enough. Dan Rather would intone at the end of a story by saying; “Questions Remain!” Yet in this case not only do questions remain but so do the answers; and no one in the main stream media seem to care. Why?

Then I noticed that great efforts were being made at considerable cost to prevent anyone from looking into any aspect of his previous life. Why?

If there is nothing to hide why hide it? The media demanded this of McCain and he produced the necessary paper work immediately. The major media outlets demand every scrap of paper about every aspect of every conservative candidate’s personal and public life; and yet they are completely ignoring this. Why?

Lou Dobbs even lost his job at CNN over this. He even stated that he didn’t believe in any of what is being called “The Birther Conspiracy” but felt it was detrimental to the country for the President to not release this information. Yet Media Matters and the Southern Poverty Law Center took strong objection to his reporting. Why?

It is clear that when someone becomes famous those who went to the same school at the same time will claim they were well acquainted with that person. Those who were acquainted then claim that they were close friends. Close friends with then claim that they were his personal favorites. And all of them remember deep discussions with that person that clearly impacted future thinking. But Obama has no one stepping forward doing this. Are there no close personal friends at college that have recollections of him at all?  There is even a small class he was supposed to have attended in which no one remembers him.  This is out of the ordinary when it comes to famous people. Where was he all of this time? Everyone has ex-friends and ex-girl friends; admittedly, not always complimentary past experiences, but they at least existed. But unless you count all the ultra left wing and violent radicals he has been closely associated with this seemingly does not apply to Obama! Why?

Where was he and who was he involved with? No one really seems to know and if anyone does they aren’t talking!

It seems to me that he is a good husband and a good father, but that isn’t a requirement to be President of the United States. Perhaps it should be, but being a natural born citizen absolutely is and being a good husband and father can’t override a Constitutional requirement. It is clear that something is wrong.

As you view this video make sure you wait until the main speaker appears. RK


Media Bans Evidence that Obama Holds U.S. Presidency Unlawfully

Arizona Sheriff and team of investigators reveal further damning evidence that Barack Obama holds his position as U.S. President unlawfully. Mainstream media conspiracy buries the story while it makes headlines overseas.  Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a five-time elected Sheriff, and former federal narcotics agent who served in several foreign countries hit the front pages in Europe with evidence that may fatally wound the political career of the current incumbent of America's highest public office. The revelations are supplemental to an immutable reason to oust Obama by enforcing an arcane U.S. federal court decision........Under law there is only one test of what constitutes a 'natural born citizen' and it is enshrined in a crucial judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor V. Happersett (88 U.S. 162) of 1875. The 'Minor-v-Happersett' case clearly defines Natural Born Citizen as someone who can show that both of their parents were born in the United States, which obviously excludes Obama on his father's side.

Pravda asks: What happened to American media?

Accuses U.S. press of 'deliberately hiding evidence' of Obama's 'fraud' - It’s a twist of irony: The Russian news website Pravda has published an accusation that the American media is “tame,” afraid to publish news and is “deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about [President Obama's] defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States.”

In a March 7 Pravda column, “Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged,” Dianna Cotter, a senior at American Military University, blasts America’s mainstream media for their virtual silence about Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s six-month investigation into the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate and his constitutional eligibility for office.

No comments: