By Hank Campbell | January
19th 2015
One
of the biggest struggles in toxicology is creating the correct
parameters so you are modeling the real world as closely as possible.
It's an enormous task to model the environment with its millions of
factors, so controlled studies are done using animals.
Scientists
design experiments that give an animal a lot of something at once and
that can tell them 'this is the threshold where more analysis is a waste
of time' and perhaps also find an effect that may be worth studying in
more detail. It's a time-honored technique but it's also a technique
that can be exploited.
Imagine you read a headline claiming that
drinking Scotch was linked to massive brain damage and sudden death.
That's an alarming finding and it's likely you would stop drinking
Scotch due to the precautionary principle,
even if you had consumed Scotch safely in the past. .........Drinking
10,000 shots of Scotch at once is not a real world possibility. Yet
beyond the pale of reality is how a large number of toxicology results
get portrayed - and the public doesn't know it unless they read the fine
print. ......'No
one has, no one will and no one can get enough atrazine into them to cause an
adverse effect.' That's an extreme way of saying that these minuscule amounts
in water that you occasionally see are totally irrelevant to the biological
system. Period."
My Take - For easy reference 10,000 shots of scotch
@ 1.5 oz. per shot is 585.8231 bottles of Scotch. Please see the "Note"
at the end of article. Real science is meaningless to the greenies, and
that's why I keep saying that to be green is to be irrational,
misanthropic and morally defective. Mostly I've come to believe it means
being insane - how else can you explain why they take the positions
they take.
No comments:
Post a Comment