March 17, 2018 By Fay Voshell
Recently the Huffington Post published an interview with Malcom Brenner, who had sex with a dolphin. He defended his bestiality, saying: “And I’m hoping that in a more enlightened future, zoophilia will be no more regarded as controversial or harmful than interracial sex is today.”
For those who have watched the steady descent of the sexual revolution into an abyss of deviancy, there is not much that surprises. Many predicted the results of following the “If it feels good, do it” mantra of the 60s would mean open season on all Christian sexual mores. They have watched as the so-called freedom of sexual choice has become so absolute that even pedophilia is viewed with increasing acceptance.
But the most powerfully dangerous ideation of the sexual revolution has arisen in the form of transgenderism, which advocates freedom to choose gender, thus distorting, blurring, or even eradicating the distinction between male and female. How did matters regarding sexuality come to such a pass in a country that once was, and in many ways still is, a deeply Christian nation?.............The New Paganism utilizes the powers of the State, particularly the law and the courts, in order to change the foundations of a Christianized West and to promote paganism, even barbarism, as the basis of Western society. Barbarism then seeks to use the State to achieve an iron and tyrannous order, beginning with crushing dissenters like Christians, who believe they are to obey God rather than the State..............Read more
My Take - The fact of the matter is the leaders of main line Christian religions have compromised Biblical teaching for decades, and in point of fact we can easily say for centuries. The tendency to accept what the ruling class and what the pubic wanted was part and parcel of the post first century Christian churches pattern.
The fact that Christian bishops allowed Roman Emperor Constantine - a pagan politician - to convene and preside over the Council of Nicaea in 325 (not all Bishops attended for that reason) to make decisions over Christine doctrine, and who made the final decision on the Trinity Doctrine speaks volumes about the divisive problems of the Christian Church of that era.
He made the decision to accept the Trinity Doctrine because the pro-Trinitarian Athanasian crowd was politically ascendant, but as the political winds changed to the anti-Trinitarian Arian crowd, he reversed himself, and more than once for political expediency.
So this pattern of diluting Biblical teaching for political acceptance isn't anything new, but it's a disaster for society, as there are few willing to do what needs to be done to stand against the attack of these leftist Godzilla’s.
Recently the Huffington Post published an interview with Malcom Brenner, who had sex with a dolphin. He defended his bestiality, saying: “And I’m hoping that in a more enlightened future, zoophilia will be no more regarded as controversial or harmful than interracial sex is today.”
For those who have watched the steady descent of the sexual revolution into an abyss of deviancy, there is not much that surprises. Many predicted the results of following the “If it feels good, do it” mantra of the 60s would mean open season on all Christian sexual mores. They have watched as the so-called freedom of sexual choice has become so absolute that even pedophilia is viewed with increasing acceptance.
But the most powerfully dangerous ideation of the sexual revolution has arisen in the form of transgenderism, which advocates freedom to choose gender, thus distorting, blurring, or even eradicating the distinction between male and female. How did matters regarding sexuality come to such a pass in a country that once was, and in many ways still is, a deeply Christian nation?.............The New Paganism utilizes the powers of the State, particularly the law and the courts, in order to change the foundations of a Christianized West and to promote paganism, even barbarism, as the basis of Western society. Barbarism then seeks to use the State to achieve an iron and tyrannous order, beginning with crushing dissenters like Christians, who believe they are to obey God rather than the State..............Read more
My Take - The fact of the matter is the leaders of main line Christian religions have compromised Biblical teaching for decades, and in point of fact we can easily say for centuries. The tendency to accept what the ruling class and what the pubic wanted was part and parcel of the post first century Christian churches pattern.
The fact that Christian bishops allowed Roman Emperor Constantine - a pagan politician - to convene and preside over the Council of Nicaea in 325 (not all Bishops attended for that reason) to make decisions over Christine doctrine, and who made the final decision on the Trinity Doctrine speaks volumes about the divisive problems of the Christian Church of that era.
He made the decision to accept the Trinity Doctrine because the pro-Trinitarian Athanasian crowd was politically ascendant, but as the political winds changed to the anti-Trinitarian Arian crowd, he reversed himself, and more than once for political expediency.
So this pattern of diluting Biblical teaching for political acceptance isn't anything new, but it's a disaster for society, as there are few willing to do what needs to be done to stand against the attack of these leftist Godzilla’s.
No comments:
Post a Comment