By Rich Kozlovich
Over the years we've seen the term "social justice" a lot. But what does that mean exactly? Well, like all slogans from the left - it means whatever the left wants it to mean. And it usually takes on a patina of gray....eveything falls into a gray area for the left..... as long as it's promoting wrongs they want to be rights, and rights they want to be wrong. The color gray is the color of fog - hard to see through.
However, in the real world devoid of these self delusional leftists social justice can take on a different patina. Mexico's 'avengers' are armed citizens who are sick of the government failure to curtail crime and violence properly, or punish it properly, and the public is supporting them. Are they organized? No! This is now a wave of activity being embraced by a larger and larger portion of Mexican society who are sick of crime and the lack of punishment. They've decided if they're to have potection from crime and violence - they must provide it for themselves.
This is a trend that's going to expand in more countries than Mexico. But they weren't the first. In the article: The Mad Monks of Myanmar they're presented in a negative light, but I have been following this story and my first link was on Thursday, April 18, 2013 with the article, Monks Gone Bad, I pointed out: "There is a question not answered, nor is it asked in this article.
The author talks about poverty as a vehicle for inclusion into the religious orders, but that isn't an explanation as to why this particular group of monks she discusses have decided to be violent against Muslims. There is much more to this story that isn't being told, and it is my belief the right questions aren't being asked.
This article answers those unasked questions when a monk named Wirathu says; “Muslims are fundamentally bad. Mohammed allows them to kill any creature. Islam is a religion of thieves, they do not want peace." Does that sound irrational and hate filled? Or is that merely an observation of reality? Well, what's been going on in Europe since they've embraced their current Mulsim invasion called immigration. Crime, violence and rape is endemic.
I have stated in the past that at some point there is going to be a backlash against Muslim violence. What I didn’t expect was to see it started by Buddhists. What I also find interesting is how much the world bemoans violence against Muslims, and yet those same voices seem to be silent at violence perpetrated by Muslims. The world has gone nuts. This much is clear though. When it starts it will become more unpleasant than anything we have seen for a long time. I expect to see Eruope exploding in a civil war, and Europe's governments toppling like dominoes.
In Chicago the shooting of black thug by an off-duty policeman triggered the usual race baiting protests. The man was attacking a fireman - he was armed - he refused to acknowledge the cops instructions - and he was shot. So what's to protest? I'll bet the fireman who was being attacked has no problem with this cop, and now "Chicago superintendent Eddie Johnson, officials at Chicago Public Schools and protesters from the Black Lives Matter faction planned to meet to discuss the situation." What situation? And since when did a crime become a situation? The man was an armed attacker and got shot. and a video corroborates the officer's story. So what's to discuss?
Maybe these race baiting community organizers think this cop should have ignored the "situation"? Or perhaps he should have called other police and waited patiently for them to intervene.....many minutes or even hours later? Or perhaps he should have approached this thug nicely and pleaded with him to be kind and considerate to the fireman he was assaulting.
Saying "pretty please" doesn't work with thugs, especially armed thugs. It seems to me that's a good way of getting our police shot. Don't you think? So......what's to discuss?
Oh, wait, I know....I know.....these race baiting excusers for the thugs of the world will ask they be allowed to undertake the task of patrolling the streets themselves! And to show the world how to properly do this unpleasant task they'll do it without guns, or weapons of any kind! Now that's a great idea, don't you think? I like that idea...... a lot! I can't imagine a better way of being rid of them.
While the Donald "shuffled his transition team three days after his surprising victory, diluting the role of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie while increasing the influence of Vice President-elect Mike Pence and Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, one of Washington’s most vocal critics of illegal immigration", - all conservatives - Democratic leaders have decided to make "Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the next head of the Democratic National Committee". Ellison is a favorite for the position among liberal advocacy groups and lawmakers, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the runner-up in this year's Democratic presidential primaries. Reid's backing is the latest sign that support for Ellison is broad. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), Reid's likely successor, endorsed Ellison for the job on Friday."
So they're choosing very progressive black Muslim...in short....a radical leftist who holds religious convictions antithetical to American law and values. They're choosing a man whose religious convictions require him to hate Jews, gays, abuse women, freedom of choice and permits pedophilia.
Islam means "submission", and that's what they've imposed on every nation or people they've dominated. Domination of society under Sharia is now and has always been the thrust of Muslims all through history - and that history is incontestable. Ask any Christan or Jew living under Islamic law in Muslim controlled countries. And since they're choosing a man whose core values support all the above I have to ask: Is that their idea of "social justice"?
And the Democratic brain trust thinks that should work really well the next election?
For those who've been watching Reid and Shumer - it's clear they're clueless, they're reckless, they've no real moral foundation and will jump on any bandwagon that will give them power. They will scream moral outrage at a conservative for any action they take that offends the left and then turn right around and adopt the very "outrage" they railed against when it suits their agenda.
They will never re-evaluate who and what they are because if they do that they will have to acknowledge they have no vision based on reality. The visions of the left are convenient, propagandists paradisaic delusions, so they will keep on the path they've chosen. They scream about Social Justice and then work to support and promote those who believe and live lives devoid of justice of any kind, and not one word from this cabal about the atrocities committed by Muslims against Christians and other religions in Muslim controlled countries.
The fact of the matter is - who exactly do they have who's not a radical leftist? There are no conservatives in the Democratic party or even moderates, the closest of which was former Senator Jim Webb, and he was crushed early in the 2016 primaries. Their second best loved guy was even more radical than Hillary - Bernie Sanders - and he wasn't even a Democrat until he ran. It would appear the Democrats have no vision other than getting into power by pandering to the members of the Church of the Eternal Whine. Make no mistake about this - the Democratic party in it's current makeup will not deviate from the path they chose decades ago.