Testimony before Congress was based on model hindcast, actual data ignored
Guest essay by Michael Wallace, Hydrologist
Members of the global science and lay communities have begun to learn of the
confirmed omission of 80 years of instrumental data from contemporary ocean
acidification (OA) scientific products. The missing ~2 million data points
comprise a majority of the world’s historical ocean pH measurements. The data
was replaced without disclosure, by a model hind cast. The substituted history,
known as the FEEL2899 report (1) was itself used as the technical basis for
testimony to the US Congress (2). In turn, OA mitigation research funding was
augmented, and the regulation of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
was strengthened and deepened.
This occurrence of a model-replacing-data-without-disclosure has few publicized
precedents of this scale. Already some in media have chosen to headline this as
a case of “pHraud” (3). Whatever it is called, a fundamental question remains
whether or not this omission will ever be corrected. Currently the major
obstacle to rapid correction appears to be a consensus among those in power,
that ocean pH cannot (and could never) be instrumentally measured using any
conceivable means for any conceivable ocean purpose by any conceivable scientist.
Therefore those in power effectively assert that the world must put aside
expectations of data accessibility and transparency, and accept the PMEL
authors’ formerly undisclosed SeaCarb model hindcast replacement as the entire
truth of past ocean pH.
I came into awareness of the ocean pH data omission myself, purely through
research activities, which led to personal communications with the authors of
the omission (4). I learned through two of those authors some facts concerning
the origins, pervasiveness, and structure of the omissions....Click this link to see complete article:
No comments:
Post a Comment