Make no mistake,
this is a real fight and we are being represented by men defending our rights.
There are more in Arizona, in Florida, in Oregon, in Idaho, in Montana and in
Wisconsin. They all need our help if rural America and our way of life are to
survive.
The following
letters and newspaper article are good news that bode well.
Thanks to the NC
Triangle Chapter of SCI International. Where are the rest of “our” conservation
organizations? Ask them to, at least, send letters of support and to copy USFWS
and their Congressmen, and then run it with an article in those slick magazines
we get for our membership. When you do, remember the old saying, “you will know
them by their deeds”.
Jim Beers
By Jett Ferebee
To: Ms. Sharneka
Harvey U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service
EASTERN
NORTH CAROLINA — The Endangered Species Act 10(J) rule specifically states that
a nonessential experimental population of wolves may only be released within
their historical range.
The
attached Department of Interior map — commissioned by the DOI to determine the
historical range of the red wolf for the species’ reintroduction program —
clearly shows that the red wolf was never native to the State of North
Carolina.
In
1995, this statement was added to the 50 CFR Part 17 1995 rules revision for
the red wolf program in NC:
“(9)(i) The
Alligator River reintroduction site is within the historic range of the species
in North Carolina, in Dare, Hyde, Tyrrell, and Washington Counties; because of
its proximity and potential conservation value, Beaufort County is also
included in the experimental population designation.”
In a recent Red
Wolf ‘Program Evaluation’ prepared by the Wildlife Management Institute, the
former Red Wolf Coordinator for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Mike
Phillips, made the following comments:
“It
should be clearly noted in the report that the red wolf genome that exists is
the product of selective breeding by U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologists in the
1970s.”
“There is no
denying that the existing red wolf genome is something of a human construct.”
Ms. Harvey, please provide specific and detailed evidence that the “red wolf” that was a “human construct” and was “selectively bred” in a zoo in Tacoma, Washington, using hybridized coy-wolves from the State of Texas was ever present in the North Carolina counties of Dare, Hyde, Tyrrell, Washington, and Beaufort as explicitly stated and added in 9(i) of the 50 CFR Part 17 1995 Rules revisions mentioned above.
Ms. Harvey, please provide specific and detailed evidence that the “red wolf” that was a “human construct” and was “selectively bred” in a zoo in Tacoma, Washington, using hybridized coy-wolves from the State of Texas was ever present in the North Carolina counties of Dare, Hyde, Tyrrell, Washington, and Beaufort as explicitly stated and added in 9(i) of the 50 CFR Part 17 1995 Rules revisions mentioned above.
The fact that this
“invented” red wolf or any red wolf was never native to the State of North
Carolina is perhaps a great indicator as to why, after 28 years, this taxpayer funded experiment continues to fail.
I
would like this information in whatever format is most cost effective for the
Service. I am a private citizen and will pay the costs up to $1,000 without the
need for you to ask my permission. If I missed something, please let me know.
Thanks,
Jett Ferebee
Greenville, N.C.
Greenville, N.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment