Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

A Response to Richard Dawkins

by Dennis Prager October

He and his supporters have a right to their atheism, but not to intellectual dishonesty about it. This past Friday, CNN conducted an interview with Richard Dawkins, the British biologist most widely known for his polemics against religion and on behalf of atheism. Asked “whether an absence of religion would leave us without a moral compass,” Dawkins responded: “The very idea that we get a moral compass from religion is horrible.”

This is the crux of the issue for Dawkins and other anti-religion activists — that not only do we not need religion or God for morality but that we would have a considerably more moral world without them. This argument is so wrong — both rationally and empirically — that its appeal can be explained only by (a) a desire to believe it and (b) an ignorance of history.

First, the rational argument. If there is no God, the labels “good” and “evil” are merely opinions. They are substitutes for “I like it” and “I don’t like it.” They are not objective realities. Every atheist philosopher I have debated has acknowledged this……To Read More…..

No comments:

Post a Comment