This appeared here and I thank Alan for allowing me to publish his work. RK
“The beauty of
video, especially amplified by the Internet, is to allow a handful of citizen
journalists working on a shoestring to end-run the biggest news organizations
in the world.”
James O’Keefe,
the young man who exposed the corruption within ACORN, an organization whose
voter registration program and others were closely allied with the Democratic
Party, has written “Breakthrough: Our Guerrilla War to Expose Fraud and Save
Democracy.”
Fresh out of
college, O’Keefe formed Project Veritas
to go after stories that were being ignored by the mainstream press. ACORN
gained him national attention when he and a female colleague pretended to be a
pimp and a prostitute looking to purchase a home where they could import
underage girls for the sex trade. Their hidden camera and microphone recorded
the way ACORN employees were unfazed by this and offered advice on how to do
it.
O’Keefe was
fortunate to secure the late Andrew Breitbart as his mentor and, through him,
access to major media personalities and outlets such as Glenn Beck who at the
time had a popular show on Fox News. Breitbart was pioneering Internet news
gathering and reporting on his own popular website, one element of which was
BigGovernment.com.
As PJTV
commentator Bill Whittle would note in the wake of the ACORN expose and
subsequent legislation that defunded it, “I think the enemy they were fighting
against are the media. By not covering the story, not at all…Breitbart showed
that the media is no longer merely biased. They’re no longer even ignoring the
news. The mainstream media is now in the news
suppression business.”
O’Keefe notes
that “the New York Times suppresses
more stuff, more consequentially, than any other media outlet in the world.
Like the Post, the Times tried not to notice the ACORN
furor. The newspaper ran its first staff-written article on the subject on
September 15, five days after the airing of the initial video and three days
after the Post had run its front-page story.” O’Keefe was not even contacted by
a Times reporter until two days after its initial story.
The impact of
what O’Keefe’s citizen journalism was having was not lost on journalists who
make their living within the business. Then executive editor of The New York Times, Bill Keller, would
write “Julian Assange (of WikiLeaks) aims to enlist the media; O’Keefe aims to
discredit us. But each, in his own guerrilla way, has sown his share of public
doubt about whether the press can be trusted as an impartial bearer of news.”
O’Keefe,
however, says that “in truth we don’t have the wherewithal to discredit the
media. We merely scoop them. They discredit themselves by refusing to cover
stories with national implications that much of America already knows to be
news.” The current examples of this are the 2012 Benghazi attack and the
Obamacare debacle that continues to unfold with illegal delays, waivers, and
its hideous implementation by an already tarnished Internal Revenue Service,
involved in its own scandal.
As someone who
joined the Society of Professional Journalists on April 1, 1979 and maintained
membership ever since, I can attest that journalism over the thirty-five years or
more that I have practiced it, has rarely been about being impartial. Indeed,
it has gotten worse. Before and since, journalism has largely been an
enterprise whose aim has been to advance liberal ideas, liberal legislative
initiatives, and those espousing them.
The next time
you’re reading the daily newspaper, listening to the radio, or watching
television, what you’re not likely to receive is news that will do harm to the
progressive agenda. You are receiving the liberal interpretation of what the news
is and is not. Were it not for O’Keefe’s efforts you would not have known about
ACORN, the deep biases within those running the National Public Radio
programming, the attitudes uncovered in the New Jersey Teachers Union, and
others.
The response to
O’Keefe’s guerrilla journalism has been attacks by those in the news industry
to discredit him while reporting on his exposes. He has also been subjected to
a bevy a legal suits from those afflicted by the truths he reported. “Although
I have been called a liar in a thousand different ways, I have not once been
sued for libel or defamation. I have, however, sued others for libeling me. Of
course, you would not know that from reading the New York Times.
“The beauty of
video, especially as amplified by the Internet,” writes O’Keefe, “is to allow a
handful of citizen journalists working on a shoestring to end-run the biggest
news organizations in the world. When the American people saw our videos, they
responded.”
In the aftermath
of the ACORN story, O’Keefe reflected that, “There would be no Pulitzers
waiting for us at the end of the day, no speaking engagements at prestigious
J-schools. Instead we would face a continuing blizzard of legal challenges, a
swarm of snippy media critics, and a tsunami of insider outrage at the
slightest accusation of impropriety…It can be brutal along the way, but in the
end there is something incredibly beautiful about shoving the facts down the
throat of the mainstream media and watching them gag on the truth.”
If you are
wondering why President Obama, despite questions about his eligibility to hold
office, despite scandals growing like mushrooms, despite his outright lies
about Obamacare and the Benghazi attack, continues to go largely unchallenged
by the mainstream press, O’Keefe provides a pithy answer. “If today’s reporters
found themselves in revolutionary France, they would be endorsing the head
choppers, and their audience would cheer each head as it hit the basket.”
© Alan Caruba,
2013
No comments:
Post a Comment