Is This A Crime Against Humanity or Not? Is This a Crime?

By Rich Kozlovich

These links are from Steve Milloy's Junkscience.com.

The question that I keep asking myself, is this: When is someone going to be charged with a crime?  No matter what anyone tries to claim, a crime against humanity has been committed.  And it has been committed by authorities at the Environmental Protection Agency and the researchers they hired.  They cannot claim they were just following orders.  That excuse has been dealt with and rejected ever since Captain Henry Wirz was tried and hung for what happened at Andersonville prison during the American Civil War.  It was once again rejected at the Trials at Nuremberg.  Are these events anywhere near as serious?  In their effect and impact; no!  In principle; yes!

These people are not permitted to make their own laws, they are not permitted to ignore the laws that exist, and they are not permitted to interpret them in ways that are out of harmony with the intent.  But then again, that has been going on for so long and the Congress hasn't had the courage to put a stop to it, is it any wonder they are out of control. 

I do think we need to ask this question. What constitutes a crime against humanity?  We know that Hitler’s killing of six million Jews and about six million more Eastern Europeans has been so designated as crimes against humanity.  But Mao, Stalin and Castro killed tens of millions of their own people and are these crimes aren’t so designated as crimes against humanity.   Why?

We need clarity.  It is the lack of courage and the will to stand up and say the truth.  The media has obfuscated the truth from the time when Walter Duranty lied (and the rest of the media knew he lied) about Stalin’s deliberate starvation of millions of his own people. Surely the media must bear a huge burden of the guilt. 

There is one more thing.  How many people does it take to constitute a crime against humanity?  We know that at least six million is so considered, but what if a government deliberately chooses to do these things to .....one....person?  How many does it take?

1.       Is the University of Rochester trying to hide its illegal human experiments? (May 15)

2.      JunkScience was right! 400 ppm CO2 level not reached last week, NOAA admits (May 13)

3.      JunkScience instrumental in blocking vote on EPA nominee McCarthy (May 9)

4.      EPA fails to explain deletion of illegal diesel experiment on children from data base (April 25)

5.      More Ground Zero Junk Science (April 24)

6.      Another dim bulb for energy April 12

7.      EPA un-scrubs data base of experiment exposing children to diesel exhaust (March 22)

8.     Must-Watch Video: NBC-17 reports on human testing personal injury claim against EPA (March 21)

9.      EPA sued for $2 million by human testing victim; Injured by exposures to high levels of chlorine, diesel exhaust and ozone — without informed consent (March 20)

10.  Chlorine gas possibly used in Syria -- but definitely used on people by the EPA: Another shocking human experiment (March 20)

11.   UWashington Letter to Human Guinea Pigs: Oops…we exposed you to a carcinogen! (March 18)

12.  EPA human testing scandal extends to University of Washington; Study subjects not told diesel exhaust can kill March 12

13.  EPA accused of hacking private e-mail to block investigation of misdeeds at Montana Superfund site (March 11)

14.  NBC-17 Investigates: State bill could shut down EPA experiments (March 7)

15.   North Carolina bill would make EPA human experiments a felony (March 6)

16.  Victory: JunkScience forces Juliet Eilperin out of WaPo environment beat March 4

17.   EPA scrubs database of air pollution experiment on children? February 25

18.  WashTimes: Judge nixes case against EPA human experiments (February 13)

19.  Senators Question EPA Air Regulation Rule Over Human Testing (February 5)

20. Human testing lawsuit dismissed; Court lacks jurisdiction to hear case against EPA February 1

21.  NBC-17 Video Report: Alleged conflicts of interest in controversial EPA experiments February 1

22. North Carolina Medical Board rife with conflicts of interest in EPA human testing controversy January 29

23. North Carolina Medical Board refuses to discipline EPA human testing docs January 29

24. China’s bad air puts the lie to EPA scare tactics January 22

25.  EPA’s illegal human experiments could break Nuremberg Code (January 1)

26. 2012

27.  Chutzpah: EPA lies about human testing in new air pollution rule (December 17)

28. EPA-funded University of Rochester researchers test deadly air pollutant on diabetics (December 16)

29. Medical Journal Article Calls EPA Human Experiments Illegal and Unethical (December 11)

30. Shock: EPA exposes human guinea pigs to lead; Agency ignores own ‘no safe’ exposure determination (December 10)

31.  What’s EPA Smoking? (December 3)

32. Divine Right of EPA: Agency says it’s above the law on human testing (November 25)

33. EPA asks court to dismiss human testing lawsuit (November 23)

34. NBC-17 Investigates: Inspector General investigating EPA testing in Chapel Hill (November 19)

35.  EPA Inspector General Announces Investigation of Illegal Human Testing (November 16)

36. Carbon Tax is Pointless and Inflationary (November 14)

37.  EHP refuses to investigate EPA researcher misconduct (November 5)

38. New documents prove falsification in EPA air study; JunkScience renews retraction request (October 31)

39. EPA’s Dirty, Dark Secret October 23

40. NBC-17: Congress wants probe of human testing claims at UNC-CH (October 20)

41.  House Committee requests investigation into illegal EPA human testing (October 19)

42. EPA’s illegal human experiments (October 18)

43. Teenager died in 1996 government-funded air pollution experiment at Univ. Rochester; University now using diabetics as air pollution guinea pigs (October 12)

44. Video: Steve Milloy on Illegal EPA Human Testing (October 11)

45.  EPA Free to Gas Sick People: Court Denies TRO Against EPA for Human Testing Citing Jursidiction (October 9)

46. EPA admits to Court: Human subjects ‘may die’ from air pollution experiments (October 5)

47.  EPA invokes Fifth Amendment with media in human testing scandal? (October 2)

48. Inhofe Asks for Hearing on EPA’s Alleged Conducting of Illegal Human Experiments (October 1)

49. North Carolina Medical Board Continues Investigation of EPA Doctors in Human Testing Scandal; Case Closed for UNC Doc (October 1)

50. Must-See Video: NBC-17 (WNCN-Raleigh) Report on Illegal EPA Human Testing (September 28)

51.   Court Asked for Emergency Restraining Order Against EPA Human Testing (September 28)

52.  Washington Examiner: EPA accused of illegal human experimentation September 27

53.  EPA comments on human testing lawsuit; Claims UNC is ‘independent’; Records show otherwise (September 26)

54.  North Carolina Medical Board Opens Investigation of Another EPA Doc (September 25)

55.  EPA sued in federal court for conducting illegal human experiments (September 24)

56.  JunkScience.com Announces EPAHumanTesting.com (September 18) | Models, not climate, are hypersensitive to carbon dioxide (August 24)

57.  Top Federal Scientist Expects EPA Stonewalling, Lying About Human Experiments (July 20)

58. Video: Milloy exposes EPA’s outlaw human experiments at Locke Foundation July 17

59.  UNC to investigate ghastly EPA human experiments (July 2)

60. NIEHS stonewalls on EPA researcher misconduct (June 28)

61.  North Carolina Medical Board to investigate EPA physicians over human experiments (June 27)

62. North Carolina Medical Board asked to investigate EPA physicians for illegal human experiments (June 13)

63. No Time for Bioethics at Presidential Bioethics Commission (June 4)

64. NIH asked to investigate misconduct at Environmental Health Perspectives in EPA Human Testing Scandal (June 1)

65.  EPA asked to investigate scientific misconduct (May 23)

66. EPA Inspector General Asked to Investigate Illegal Human Experimentation (May 14)

67.  Journal editor rejects Milloy request to retract false case report of EPA human experiment (May 8)

68. EPA denies Milloy charge of conducting unethical human experiments; Facts show otherwise (May 2)

69. Did Obama’s EPA relaunch Tuskegee experiments? (Apr. 25)

70. EPA human experiments debunk notion of ‘killer’ air pollution: Agency hides exculpatory results (Apr. 18)

71.   EPA IG to investigate EPA air science advisers (Mar. 26)

72.  JunkScience exposes corrupt EPA science advisory board (Mar. 8)