Science is a long-term process that only brings meaning when numerous, scientifically robust studies produce consistent results. But when it comes to politically loaded issues — such as chemical safety — a single study with a “weak association” and a small pool of subjects can capture headlines ad nauseam, creating the impression that consumers face a looming public health crisis where none really exists. As readers of this blog and that of my chemical policy coalition know well, bisphenol A (BPA) — a chemical used to make hard plastics and resins that line food containers — is the subject of many such headlines. Studies on the substance come out regularly and sensationalist news stories and blog posts from BPA detractors suggest that each study provides yet more evidence that the chemical….. But what will mainstream news outlets and anti-BPA activists make of one of the more recent studies, which reports that a prior study indicting BPA as an “obesogen” (a chemical that makes you fat!) is not reproducible.…..to Read More…..
My Take - A study that is not reproducible is not science. In point of fact, many of these "profound studies" are nothing more than conclusions in search of data, and the greenie will tout them unendingly. At times....based on these types of studies.....regulations are promulgated that we are stuck with even after studies have not only shown to be unscientific but fraudulent. But let's get this totally clear in our minds. If a study can't be replicated it is either wrong, badly designed, badly performed or fraudulent. But it isn't science.
No comments:
Post a Comment