Search This Blog

De Omnibus Dubitandum - Lux Veritas

Saturday, June 20, 2015

Pam Geller's Atlas Shrugs

Boston jihad savages plead “not guilty” in plot to behead Pamela Geller - Of course they pleaded “not guilty” because they are acting and adhering to Islamic law (sharia).  Two jihadis pleaded not guilty Friday to conspiring to support the Islamic State group in a plot to “kill a conservative blogger Pamela Geller who has angered Muslims.” What doesn’t anger Muslims? And are we to refrain from doing anything that Muslims don’t like or might anger them?.....

UK: Muslim used threats, rape, control and violence to force women to become sex slaves - A couple of weeks ago, I published an interview that I conducted with one of the non-Muslim girls raped, sex-trafficked, abused and tortured by hundreds of Muslim men in what are now known as the British Muslim child sex gangs rampant in the UK.  This savage was jailed for life, but there are thousands of these Muslim predators who remain at large, terrorizing their victims and acting with impunity.

Here is what one victim told me:

I met with the police myself in April 2015. They still weren’t interested. I gave them names of 80 Muslim men who had raped and beaten me. Nothing has happened to those men. I still see them down with the taxis. I can’t publish their names – then they will know it’s me, and they will seize me and...

Breitbart: Clear Channel Refuses AFDI Ads Countering ICNA’s Lies with the Truth About Muhammad - The deck is stacked — everywhere — and that is why we are losing to the most savage and brutal ideology on the face of the earth.

JCRC Hypocrites and Michael S. Miller Standing with BOYCOTTS OF ISRAEL - With Jewish leaders like the JCRC and Alisa Doctoroff of UJA-Federation, one does not know whether to laugh or to cry. As we wrote a few months ago, the JCRC stands with the New Israel Fund with the Executive Director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Boston (JCRC) posting support for NIF, saying: “Friends – These two are member organizations of JCRC. They aren’t always the most popular groups amongst some of our other members, and I have my disagreements on various policy issues with them, as I certainly do with many of our member organizations from time to time. But they are part of the community of Jews who are committed to the existence of a Jewish and democratic State of Israel.” “So in the wake of...

ISIS: French suicide attackers ‘ready to strike’ France - It’s not just France …. as we have seen here in America, they mean to strike everywhere freedom reigns…………France’s intelligence fears new attacks in the country carried out by French suicide bombers, Le Figaro reports, quoting an investigation by national authorities. According to the probe, ”1,730 potential jihadists (are) ready to strike” while keeping in detention French nationals who have returned from fighting a ”holy war” appears increasingly difficult.  Meanwhile, according to Le Parisien, two men were apprehended...

Voice of Israel Interview with Pamela Geller: ‘Jihad Is Upon Us’ - I conducted an in-depth interview with Voice of Israel’s Yishai Fleisher in Jerusalem. It is a wide-ranging discussion on the global jihad in the West, the world and jihad against the Jews.

SPLC Issues Hit List of U.S. Women Against Sharia Law - With three jihadis dead and two jihadis jailed in attempts to kill me, this is just encouraging more jihadis to come after me — and the other women this Communist hate group names. At a time when jihad killers are moving actively against those whom they hate in the U.S., this is a quite literal hit list. If any of the people named on this list are attacked or killed by jihadis, the SPLC ought to be shut down and prosecuted for incitement — not that such a thing is likely to happen in Obama’s America. Instead, Obama will probably send the SPLC a letter of commendation the week after the killing, as he did with the Oklahoma mosque after a Muslim beheaded one of his coworkers there.  “SPLC Issues Hit List of U.S. Women...

You Know You're in Trouble When The Club of Rome Approves

Benny Peiser's Global Warming Policy Foundation Reports Lord Lawson Criticises The Pope’s Encyclical on Global Warming
While the Club Of Rome Welcomes His Green Encyclical

The encyclical is a thoroughly reactionary document. A mixture of junk science, junk economics and junk ethics, what Pope Francis advocates would prevent the world’s poor from escaping from poverty – just as it would have prevented the industrial revolution, which enabled the western world to escape from poverty and squalor. I’m sure the Pope means well, but it is well known that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. –Lord Lawson, Ideacity Conference, 19 June 2015

“The present world system is certainly unsustainable,” Pope Francis says. Surely we cannot know this. If that word “certainly” is wrong, we should apply the “precautionary principle” so beloved of the catastrophists. The burden of proof is on them before we let them stifle economic growth. Papal advisers may feel that, by associating himself with environmentalism, the Pope is reading the signs of the times. The opposite could be true. He could be painting himself into a corner, as some in the Church did in the past when they denounced the theory of evolution. --Charles Moore, The Daily Telegraph, 20 June 2015

The Papal encyclical on the environment is especially welcome at the Club of Rome which introduced the idea of “Limits to Growth” in the 1970s. “The Pope makes points that are indistinguishable from those that the Club of Rome has been making for years”, says Roberto Peccei, Vice President. Like the Vatican, the Club of Rome says that to solve our climate problems and build a fairer society, nature and society must be placed before economics and short term profit. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, a member of the Club of Rome, presented Pope Francis’ encyclical on the environment together with Cardinal Turkson on 18 June in Rome. --Club of Rome, 19 June 2015

When it comes to environmental and climate policy, Germany’s Scientific Advisory Council on Global Environmental Change (WBGU) is an influential advisory committee for the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The chairman of the council is Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. In April 2011, the WBGU presented a report entitled “World in Transition – Social Contract for a Great Transformation”. The main theses: The current economic model (“fossil industrial metabolism”) is untenable. The WBGU admits frankly, that the decarbonization of society can only be achieved by the limitation of democracy. To carry out this utopian new vision, democratic institutions, the freedom of lifestyles and the right to material well-being is to be sacrificed. --Fritz Vahrenholt, Die Welt, 27 Mai 2011

Friday, June 19, 2015

Civil Asset Forfiture is a Violation of the U.S. Constitution. Why is That So Hard To Grasp?

Law Enforcement Seizes $11,000 From 24-Year-Old at Airport WithoutCharging Him With a Crime by Melissa Quinn /@MelissaQuinn97/June 17, 2015/222 comments -  It was Feb. 17, 2014, and Charles Clarke, 24, just wanted to get home. After spending several weeks with family in Cincinnati, Ohio, Clarke arrived at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Hebron, Ky., for a flight back to Orlando, Fla., where his mother lived and where he would be taking classes at the University of Central Florida. With $11,000 in his pocket—the culmination of five years worth of savings from various jobs, financial aid, gifts from family members and benefits from his mother, a disabled veteran—Clarke checked his bag and headed to the gate to await the departure of his flight…...

 

 

If Michelle's Not Paid She Should Go on Strike. We'll All Be Better Off!

CLASS ACT: Laura Bush Responds to Michelle Obama’s Complaints About NotBeing Paid (WATCH) Back on the campaign trail, in 2012, First Lady Michelle Obama complained numerous times about not being paid as First Lady:

At a campaign stop in Colorado on Wednesday, President Barack Obama attempted to win over women voters by complaining about how First Lady Michelle Obama did not receive a salary for her First Lady duties. “I want to make sure that when she’s working she’s getting paid the same as men,” Obama said. “I gotta say that First Ladies right now don’t [get paid], even though that’s a tough job!”

Wow, such an attitude! Taxpayer funded vacations around the world, shopping sprees, private jets. But Michelle wants a salary, too!

If you don’t miss the Bush White House enough, just compare those comments to former First Lady Laura Bush. She sat down for a lengthy interview with C-Span, and they released a sneak preview of that conversation. Watch (above) as she handles the question with grace and charm — Laura reminds us that there are plenty of perks as First Lady, such as a private chef. Clearly, it was a position she was honored to have. We all miss having a First Lady who loved America.  This appeared here.....

 Editor’s Note: Well, since she’s so dissatisfied with not being paid to be First Lady maybe she should stay home, go shopping, watch the children, get a job or do nothing if she likes.  The fact of the matter is the less she does as First Lady the better off everyone will be. 

Michelle Obama UK visit: “When Ilook at young British Muslim women, I see myself”   -  In so many ways your story is my story.”In saying this, Michelle Obama is implying that both she and the Muslim girls she is addressing face oppression, discrimination, and disadvantage. She is, in other words, advancing the false Muslims-as-victims narrative that Islamic advocacy groups such as Hamas-CAIR work so hard to cultivate in the U.S…..Michelle Obama also said: “Maybe you see the news and see people talking about your religion, and wonder if anyone will ever see beyond your headscarf.”….But who is infringing on that right? No one. And who is not seeing beyond the headscarf? Michelle Obama meant “Islamophobes,” but the real people these girls have to fear regarding their headscarves are the Muslim men who will kill them if they don’t wear it…..Tell us, Mrs. Obama, about your oppression and disadvantage from the highest and most powerful office in the free-est country in the world. Tell us how wronged you were in between your multiple daily wardrobe changes of the most expensive designer clothes in the world. Tell us how awful it was for you to get accepted and attend Princeton University (along with your brother) in your youth and make your own choices to live your life any way you wanted to.

 Vicious hypocrite.....see more.....

Here's another example of the abuses Michelle has to endure.  Ciao! Michelle, Sasha and Malia touch down in Milan for a meeting with the Italian Prime Minister on the next step of European tour And you can tell from the pictures just how terrible her "job" really is, forced to smile while being greeted warmly.  At the expense of the American taxpayers.  Please remember....this isn't a vacation.....this is work! 

Are They Leading or Just Managing the Direction Everyone Wants to Go?

“There go the people. I must follow them for I am their leader.”Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin

By Rich Kozlovich

For years I’ve observed one incontrovertible fact. Most “leaders”aren’t really leading anyone anywhere! They’re just managers organizing the trip down a path his “followers” are willing to go. Think what would happen if a union president stood up before his membership and told them they should just be glad having a job and quit whining about a raise in salary and benefits. Before he finished that sentence he would have been dragged off the stage and replaced with a demagogue screaming how badly they’re being abused for the paltry money they’re getting. And the masses would have cheered.

What we have here is a problem of definition. Is being a leader the same as being in leadership? Maybe and maybe not!

A favorite uncle of mine used to be a UAW president and was well respected by both management and labor. When he retired both management and labor asked him to stay as they feared what would happen after he left. The plant closed not long after.

He firmly believed in observing the terms of the contract. If management was wrong – they were wrong – period! And he acted accordingly. If the membership was wrong – they were wrong – period! And he acted accordingly. When confronted by radical members he simply said – “We have a contract! And that’s what we’re following!” And that’s what he followed faithfully.

Everyone knew his yes meant yes and his no meant no - he was consistent and he was fair! After taking a strong stand at the beginning of his years as president the membership knew where he stood, as a result many of the problems simply went away. He didn’t believe in greasing squeaks just because they squeaked. And he was re-elected over and over again.

Toward the end of his working career the factories all over the city were closing. He went to a meeting of UAW presidents to discuss what was to be done. All he heard was the same old rhetoric about how they were going to make the companies pay or else. When his turn came to speak he tried to express the obvious – things were different now. He told everyone the unions had a good run and did good things for the membership, but now it was the companies turn and they had to change their views or the end result would be closed factories and lost jobs.

They were outraged calling him a traitor to the union and he should be ashamed to call himself a union man. I asked, “what did you say?” He said – “Nothing! I just sat down”! He knew it was a lost cause and so he put in his retirement papers. And he was right. Factories closed and people lost jobs. A lot of jobs! He was a leader without followers, but he was a leader nonetheless.

The problem with leadership is in ourselves. We have in innate desire to be liked, to be part of a group. That makes it difficult to take positions that will make us unpopular or disliked by the group. Let’s try and understand this very important reality. One of the most important qualities a leader must develop is the willingness to be disliked for long periods of time. Heterodoxy isn’t for the faint of heart, but it’s essential to a real leader. The reason I use the world heterodoxy is because it means doing more than just disagreeing. It means taking a stand against the conventional wisdom and having the courage to tell the rest of the world - "You're wrong and I'm going to tell you why".

John Boehner once said a leader without followers is just a man taking a walk. Well, that’s only partially true. Winston Churchill was almost completely alone in his views about Hitler - at least until the crap hit the fan. Then all of a sudden he had a host of followers. Who changed? Did Churchill change or did everyone else change? Was he any different than before? No, he was a leader without followers, but that didn’t change the fact he was a leader. And he was a leader because he never stopped touting his views, even while being disliked and depressed. That’s the difference between being a leader and being in leadership. Eventually those who are right will be leaders in leadership, not managers who are merely prominent. Over the years it’s been my unhappy experience to find many prominent people are only good at being prominent. And why is that? Because it’s about them, not about the mission. Time and reality are on the side of real leaders.

This latest mess in Washington regarding fast track trading is a classic example of “leaders” who are prominent and managing the process without the courage to stand by principles they claimed to believe in while running for office. They’ve lost sight of why they’re there. As one lady said in testimony before Congress a couple of years ago, “You forget yourselves. We don’t work for you, you work for us”.

In the case of fast track trading - how can anyone be for or against a trade agreement that’s a secret. So secret the members of Congress can’t see without all sorts of caveats, and the  American public, who are they're employers, can't see it at all. An agreement that may impact the economy for years to come either negatively or positively. One thing I think we can be sure of. There’s a reason it’s being kept from the public’s eyes. Apparently it stinks so badly these “leaders” think only they are qualified to stand the stench without throwing up.

I was recently invited to a meeting where Stephen Moore and a former commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission discussed just how out of control the federal government has become, especially this administration, forcing financial decisions on financial institutions for some policy reason or other - including decisions that are clearly detrimental to the stockholders. I commented to him afterward I felt the problem was so large and so complicated the only solution was to repeal the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments. He paused and said, “I agree!"

Do I think there are any real leaders out there today? Yes, but real leaders are never popular because they say things that make people uncomfortable, and people hate that. It’s easier to criticize or laugh at anyone out of step with the conventional wisdom rather than actually think about an issue and change their views. So I offer my nomination for a real leader today.

I nominate Pamela Geller!

Because of her work to expose Islam for what it really is she’s been threatened with beheading by Muslims. Yet she refuses to quietly go into hiding and powerfully states: “I’m a free person and I’m fighting for freedom”, "The last thing I'm going to do is go into hiding." I will not let violent threats intimidate or silence me". I do not want to die, but I will not live as a slave".

 

Thursday, June 18, 2015

The Fall of Al Jazeera America

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog

When Al Jazeera America was announced, the Qatari propaganda network was riding high. Once known as a dump for Al Qaeda videos, the Arab Spring had allowed the House of Thani to project its power across the region, toppling governments and replacing them with its Muslim Brotherhood allies.

Qatar had been notorious for its ties to Al Qaeda, but those connections had done little for the oil-rich oligarchy. The Muslim Brotherhood however handed Egypt over to Qatar. And Al Jazeera’s propaganda had been widely credited with supplying the images and messaging that made it happen.

Qatar’s key Arab Spring asset however had been in the White House. Mubarak would not have fallen if he had retained the support of the President of the United States. Nor would Gaddafi have been toppled or Assad have come under so much pressure without US military intervention or the expectation of it.

Al Jazeera America was going to be the final building block allowing the House of Thani to brainwash millions of Americans and influence foreign policy directly at the source. It was a grandiose dream for a tyranny that was increasingly living beyond its means while playing a dangerous game of empires.

Qatar had become the dominant voice on the Middle East in Washington D.C. The takeover of Gore’s left-wing Current TV would enable the totalitarian regime to launch a news network that would build on its existing relationship with the American left which saw the mainstream media as not biased enough.

How hard could launching a successful news network be?

Al Jazeera might have been riding high in the early days of 2013, but its comeuppance was already on the way. A few weeks after its announcement, the protests against its man Morsi began to take off. By the time AJA launched, Morsi had already been toppled and Al Jazeera propagandists would find themselves behind bars for their part in Qatar’s Brotherhood coup against the Egyptian government. While Al Jazeera portrayed them as journalistic martyrs, one of the most notable arrestees, Mohamed Fahmy, sued Al Jazeera for endangering him by acting as “an arm of Qatar’s foreign policy” that “was not only biased towards the Muslim Brotherhood — they were sponsors of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

These were all obvious facts that were being ignored by the mainstream media which dismissed Al Jazeera’s critics as ignorant Islamopohobes. But even as its Muslim Brotherhood allies were losing in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and Syria, Al Jazeera America would come under fire from its liberal media pals.

Al Jazeera America had made the media an offer it couldn’t resist. The leftists who flocked there had anticipated employment at a vanity network subsidized by the House of Thani that would let them do unfiltered left-wing advocacy without caring if they ever got any viewers or made any money.

It was enough that Al Jazeera appeared to share their hostility to America and Israel.
Their journalistic instincts did not lead them to ask why a foreign government would be interested in funding their journalistic fantasies or how Muslim tribal leaders could be considered progressive.

Or how they could manage to run a modern news network.

Al Jazeera America had been a disaster from the start. Its $500 million buy of Al Gore’s Current TV had been expensive but considered worth the price to get access to a huge number of cable households through Gore’s sweetheart deals with big cable companies. But the cable companies knew the difference between Al Gore and Al Jazeera and they wanted that oil money Qatar was throwing around.

So did Al Gore.
 
Gore had initially protected Al Jazeera by accusing cable companies who wanted to drop it of Islamophobia, but then turned around and sued Al Jazeera when it backstabbed him by using millions of dollars of his money in a slush fund to pay cable channels for airing its propaganda.

The House of Thani was forced to dig deeper to get Al Jazeera America into as many homes as possible, but it still wasn’t getting any actual viewers. Its average daily ratings of 13,000 viewers were less than half the already miniscule 31,000 viewers of Gore’s failed Current TV project.

Qatar had paid $25,000 per viewer and with some nights registering a zero in the demo, recouping that money through advertising was not a realistic business plan.
And then things got even worse.

Al Jazeera America’s biggest hit was “Real Money with Ali Velshi” with 54,000 viewers. Those were the kinds of ratings usually associated with cable hits like the deceased FOX Soccer Channel, but that was as good as it got for Qatar’s $500 million investment. And like all good things at Al Jazeera, it wouldn’t last.

Al Jazeera wasn’t just owned by a bigoted inbred dictatorship where everything works through nepotism; it was also run that way. Ehab Al Shihabi, its CEO, went to war with Velshi just before his own firing after the media began widely reporting on just how badly Al Jazeera America was being run.

Ehab Al Shihabi had not just burned through billions of dollars on a failed project; he had also burned through the mainstream media professionals hired to give the Qatari propaganda news network a friendly American face. Al Jazeera America had brought over CBS’s Marcy McGinnis to serve as Senior Vice President of Newsgathering, but she resigned blaming Al Shihabi. Her departure was part of a pattern of senior female personnel leaving or being forced out at the Muslim news network. Joining her was Executive Vice President of Human Resources Diane Lee and Public Relations Senior Vice President Dawn Bridges.

Al Jazeera America’s leadership had been built around Muslim men and Western women. The Western women were experienced news veterans while the Muslim men often had no real qualifications for the job. Behind the press releases, Al Jazeera America was run much like Qatar or Saudi Arabia where native Muslim nepotism hires bully and humiliate the imported Western executives who do the real work.


But Al Jazeera America was not operating in Qatar and it needed to draw on a talent pool from two groups that its bosses harbored a pathological hatred for; women and Jews.
The crisis at Al Jazeera America first went public when mainstream media outlets began reporting on a lawsuit by employee Matthew Luke which claimed that Osman Mahmud, the Senior Vice President of Broadcast Operations and Technology, had engaged in sexist and anti-Semitic behavior.

Mahmud had reportedly stated, “Whoever supports Israel should die a fiery death in hell.” Further emphasizing the links between Al Jazeera and the Muslim Brotherhood, he had also ranted that, “The enemies of Muslims in Egypt, their puppets and blind supporters are due to face death in the hospitals and streets of Egypt.”

Since then the news network has been in free fall, battling lawsuits and bad publicity. It’s a failure that has been building for a while, but it took Qatar’s abuse of fellow news organization friends and colleagues for the mainstream media to begin legitimately reporting on it.

Qatar’s old wall of silence has come down. From its FIFA corruption to the mass death of guest workers, some of its dirty laundry is finally being aired. The media is still reluctant to talk about its role in the Arab Spring or the Qatari weapons smuggling operations in Libya and Syria conducted with Obama’s complicity. Those are areas where their own progressive project too closely intersects the Islamist one.

The media was burned by Al Jazeera, but that doesn’t mean that the leftist-Islamist alliance is dead.

Al Jazeera America however is a monumental disaster that cost billions of dollars while doing very little. The news network was doomed from the start. Cable news is a slowly dying industry that is being killed by the internet. Spending a fortune to launch a new cable news network that no one wanted was a stupid act of arrogance that only a backward Islamic tyranny or Al Gore would be capable of.

But it was a testament to Qatar’s hubris that its rulers were convinced that they could draw large American audiences in a country where its brand is mainly associated with Osama bin Laden videos. It was this same hubris that led Qatar to overextend its support for the Muslim Brotherhood leaving it isolated and hated by its own neighbors.

The Muslim Brotherhood and Al Jazeera America were undone by their own hubris. There’s a lesson there, but Qatar’s arrogant rulers aren’t likely to learn it.

Transforming Education Beyond Common Core: Games for Muslim Appreciation, Emotional Intelligence, Diversity, and Masturbation

Part 4 of a 4-part Series of Articles about the Brave New World of Gaming in the Classroom (Links for Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)

Posted by Mary Grabar @ Selous Foundation

 While the event received virtually no press coverage, Games for Change revealed game developers with financial support from the Department of Education. Among the five judges were two representatives from U.S. government agencies. What they promise is a future of teachers as “Dungeon Masters” tracking students as they navigate games, games whose lessons parents are ignorant of. Profiting are the techno-gurus, progressive educrats, and a political regime seeing the fruition of a plan to completely transform education in America.

Gaming holds huge money-making potential for crony capitalists as they seek to capture an $8 billion-textbook publishing industry and transform all textbooks into video game format. For the U.S. Department of Education and progressive educators gaming promises to end “achievement gaps” and to transform students into social change agents.

Games of challenge involving fighting, racing, or sports once offered young males a release valve to hours of stultifying political correctness and feminine modes of teaching in schools. Now educational games will impose politically correct lessons. As the Games for Change event revealed, game developers, with financial support from the Department of Education, are producing games that provide lessons on Muslim cultural appreciation, bullying, slavery, Native American culture–and masturbation.

Such politically correct games are being promoted by politically connected people, such as the “powerhouse couple” of New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn (as they were introduced). They produced the celebrity-studded PBS documentary (and accompanying game), Half the Sky, about women who hold up “half the sky” globally. Kristof claimed that such entertainment can change behavior by closing the “empathy gap,” which is at the root of racial and gender biases.

The couple praised the Department of Education’s early childhood education efforts. Kristof explained that this redirection to the “zero to five” age range came because Common Core is “toxic” and has polarized education reform. He noted that Obama’s early education initiative was the only one applauded by House Speaker John Boehner at the State of the Union. Kristof repeated his call for early education in his column the next day, writing, “Education inequity is America’s original sin.”

Ken Weber, Executive Director of Zinga.org and a board member of Games for Change, then introduced Saudi Arabian prince, “HH Prince Fahad Al-Saud,” a technology entrepreneur. Weber noted that it was not often that he got to introduce a prince, whom he referred to repeatedly as “His Highness.”

The Stanford-educated prince, who spoke without an accent and was dressed like a hip-hop mogul, displayed his familiarity with lessons in academe about the “other,” as he repeated the word in reference to how the West sees the Arab world.

His games, he said, are intended to “build a celebratory narrative about diversity” and to end stereotypes about the Arab world: Osama bin Laden, Aladdin, the “evil and oppressive dictator of the day,” and especially the treatment of women. Claiming that 35 percent of tech entrepreneurs in North Africa and Arabia are women, he took the opportunity to point out gender inequalities in the U.S. While women might experience “movement restrictions” in Saudi Arabia, women in the United States earn less than men, he said. (He did not specify which “movement restrictions,” but presumably they involve driving a car.) According to Wikipedia, the prince has two wives, both princesses.

One of his companies, Na3M Games, part of the Arabic Renaissance, aims to develop the “culturally sensitive individual.” It is operated out of Jordan and Denmark (the latter because it has the largest population of Arabs in the northern European countries).

A 2013 Business Insider article praised Fahad Al-Saud for foregoing the “high life” of a Saudi prince for the life of a “tech entrepreneur and social media evangelist” who had an impact on the Arab Spring uprising. Most of his start-ups have focused on spreading Arabic culture through games, although he also developed a casino game. He was quoted as saying, “In 10 years I want to see countries in the Arab world in their rightful place as global leaders and contributors.” (Later, Rami Ismail, of Vlambeer, also made a pitch about appealing to an Arabic audience.)

Next was the Well Played Series with DePaul professor Doris Rusch. While some of the games her lab has developed, such as understanding mental illness, seem good, others, for developing “social and emotional intelligence” and dealing with bullying, seem too psychologically invasive for children. These games “assess” such things as empathy, social skills, impulse control, and cooperation, and are in line with recent efforts to teach social and emotional intelligence, and the Education Department’s focus on “non-cognitive skills.”

The session with Nordic LARP (Live Action Role Play), which originated in the Nordic countries in the late 1990s, continued the theme, as Bjarke Pedersen promoted emotionally “engaging stories” about racism, alienation, and oppression, and Cecilia Dolk likened their game, Celestra about fighting fascism in Europe, with familiar lessons in police violence and attacks on unions and workers rights. Martin Ericsson of the same group promoted Inside Hamlet as an educational game (in three acts) of the Shakespearean play that has been interpreted in multiple ways, including as a Marxist parable of power. The company is looking for a place in the U.S.

Michael Gallager, President and CEO of The Entertainment Software Association, as previously described, made an appearance again and waxed enthusiastically about the potential of transforming classrooms.

The “Pitch”

The afternoon featured a “pitch event” for prizes. Emcee Jesse Schell of Schell Games presented an image of a game-dominated future, where teachers become “dungeon masters,” tracking their students as they play games. Among the five judges were two representatives from U.S. government agencies: Laura Callanan, Senior Deputy Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts (since November 2014), and Dr. Marc Ruppel, a senior program officer at the National Endowment for the Humanities, Division of Public Programs. Ruppel, who holds a Ph.D. in Digital Studies, once worked on sponsor Tribeca Film Festival-funded “Robot Heart Stories,” and held positions at the Maryland Institute in Technology for the Humanities and NASA. Callanan had been a senior consultant, specializing in “social innovation,” with McKinsey & Company (former employer of Common Core architect David Coleman).

The other judges were Ron Goldman, co-founder and CEO of Kognito, a technology company serving state and federal agencies, and colleges and universities; Carl Robichaud, Program Officer in International Peace and Security at the Carnegie Corporation, focusing on “strengthening nuclear governance”; and Weber, of Zynga.org, a nonprofit that promotes “the use of social games for social impact.” According to the website, from 2005 to 2011, Weber had been COO of The ONE Campaign, “a global grassroots advocacy and campaigning organization founded by Bono, Bob Geldof, Bobby Shriver and others” that worked “in partnership” with the Gates Foundation (the major funder of Common Core) and international development NGOs for “poverty alleviation and global health issues, particularly in Africa.”

Unsurprisingly, the games pitched advanced the progressive agenda: Thralled is about a runaway slave; Never Alone is about Native culture in Alaska; The Sun Also Rises has nothing to do with Ernest Hemingway or Ecclesiastes, but focuses on the traumas of soldiers in Afghanistan; We Are Chicago “draws from real experiences to give a brief glimpse into the average life of a teenager living in the most dangerous neighborhoods in Chicago”; and Happy Playtime is “a sex-education game which aims to eliminate the stigma attached to female masturbation.”

Never Alone took away most of the prizes, but Happy Playtime, which has been banned by the Apple App Store, won the $10,000 dollar surprise prize from Schell Games. Happy Playtime principal Tina Gong told the judges that she wanted girls ages 10 to 16 to know that women’s bodies “belong to themselves.” She described in sexually explicit terms how points are awarded, and claimed that this game would produce good body image, less unwanted pregnancy, less abuse, and better sex. Her plans include a multi-player format with data-gathering.

This event received virtually no press coverage. Other similar events on university campuses and at conference centers have also gone on with little notice. Game designers are courted with grants from non-profits (aligned with for-profit companies) and federal agencies. All are intertwined.

What they promise is a future of teachers as “Dungeon Masters” tracking students as they navigate games, games whose lessons parents are ignorant of. Profiting are the techno-gurus, progressive educrats, and a political regime seeing the fruition of a plan to completely transform education.

Mary Grabar, Ph.D., has taught college English for over twenty years. She is the founder of the Dissident Prof Education Project, Inc., an education reform initiative that offers information and resources for students, parents, and citizens. The motto, “Resisting the Re-Education of America,” arose in part from her perspective as a very young immigrant from the former Communist Yugoslavia (Slovenia specifically). She writes extensively and is the editor of EXILED. Ms. Grabar is also a contributor to SFPPR News & Analysis.

The Warminst are Wrong on Everything, The World's Not Warming, Coal is King, Oil is Bountiful and the Pope is Clueless! So Where's the Crisis?


Benny Peiser’s Global Warming Policy Foundation Reports the World is Drowning In Oil Facing the Longest Oil Glut In Three Decades. Coal Use Growing Faster Than Any Other Energy. There is Also a Warning For the Pope - Rising Green Energy Taxes To Hit Poorest Hardest and US Catholics Divided Over Global Warming

Rising green levies on energy bills risk causing a public backlash that will undermine efforts to tackle climate change, a leading left-wing think tank has warned. Subsidies to fund green electricity projects such as wind and solar farms are paid for through levies on consumer energy bills. Joss Garman, associate director of the IPPR think tank, said: “The government’s plan to hike up green levies on energy bills risks causing a public backlash against action to address climate change, especially because they hit the poorest households hardest.” --Emily Gosden, The Daily Telegraph, 17 June 2015

Government policies intended to reduce carbon dioxide are directly harming the poor in both the developing and developed world, according to a report released by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF).

Energy sources that are not based on fossil fuels are making both power and food more expensive, the report argues. While the affluent remain relatively unaffected, the poor are bearing the brunt of rising prices. The report, entitled Climate Policy and the Poor, was the written by Professor Anthony Kelly, who died on Tuesday. Kelly, who was widely regarded as the father of composite materials in the UK, points to two major ways government policy is harming the poor in the UK and overseas. --Guy Bentley, City A.M. 6 June 2014

On the eve of a forthcoming encyclical by Pope Francis on the environment and climate change, a new Pew Research Center survey finds that U.S. Catholics’views on global warming are broadly reflective of American public opinion writ large. About seven-in-ten U.S. Catholics (71%) believe the planet is getting warmer. Nearly half of Catholic adults (47%) attribute global warming to human causes, and a similar share (48%) view it as a very serious problem. However, analysis of the survey findings shows that political party identification and race/ethnicity are much better predictors of environmental attitudes than are religious identity or observance. --Pew Research Center, 16 June 2015

Pope Francis’ encyclical on climate change should not be treated as official Catholic doctrine binding on all Catholics, but rather a personal position of the Pope, according to Father James Grant, Adjunct Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs. “Many will see the Pope’s encyclical as the official position of the Church on the area of climate change. This is simply not the case,” says Father James. “In Catholic doctrine, it is completely acceptable for Catholics to disagree with the opinions of the Pope in an encyclical. So while the encyclical will hold significant weight in the Catholic community, there is nothing new in the debate regarding encyclicals. Catholics can feel safe in being sceptical about the Pope’s opinions,” says Father James. --Institute of Public Affairs, 16 June 2015

Europe’s car manufacturers and European Union officials are locked on opposing sides as the carmakers would gladly see lax emissions rules as opposed to the governments which want greenhouse emission to go down as fast as possible. The automakers believe even tighter CO2 rules would definitely impact their global competitiveness. --Aurel Niculescu, Inauto News, 16 June 2015

Fracking offers Scotland the chance of a secure energy supply no more harmful to the environment than conventional gas production, according to a new study. The Royal Society of Edinburgh’s advice paper on “options for Scotland’s gas future” finds that “onshore production of unconventional gas” — or fracking —could offer the country security of supply without “significant risk” to health, wellbeing or safety. “The areas of health, wellbeing and safety surrounding an onshore industry do not appear to present significant risks. Domestic production onshore could improve energy security, create jobs and ensure Scotland takes responsibility for its energy consumption.” --Mike Wade, The Times,17 June 2015

Seventeen years ago –June 11, 1998 –Mitchell Energy performed the first modern frack job on a natural-gas well in Texas and unleashed the U.S. energy boom. Whether hydraulic fracturing is a force for good or evil remains one of the most divisive questions in America today. Prof Michael E. Porter says the energy boom is “perhaps the single largest opportunity to improve the trajectory of the U.S. economy.” But, he warns, Americans could fritter away this competitive advantage if they are not careful. This potential advantage could be lost because public support for fracking is weakening. “Further development is increasingly threatened,” the report warns. --Russell Gold, The Wall Street Journal, 11 June 2015

The latest round of UN climate talks have made slow progress on refining a negotiating text for the Paris summit in December, the focal point for efforts to agree curbs on greenhouse gas emissions in developed and developing countries. Despite two weeks of talks at an interim meeting in the German city of Bonn, most of the contradictory proposals that littered the previous 90-page document remain. Familiar disputes blocked progress at the mainly technical meeting in Bonn, which was being held around 500km away from this week’s G7 summit in Bavaria. But in Bonn rich nations failed to give greater clarity on how rich economies will deploy US$100 billion of climate finance a year from 2020. --John McGarrity, India Climate Dialogue, 17 June 2015

The world is on the brink of the longest-lasting oil glut in at least three decades and OPEC’s quest for market share makes it almost unavoidable. --Grant Smith, Bloomberg, 16 June 2015
According to the BP Review, over the decade to the end of 2014, coal use grew by 968 million tonnes of oil equivalent. That is 4 times faster than renewables, 2.8 times faster than oil and 50 per cent faster than gas. That’s hardly justification for a requiem. --Brendan Pearson and Michael Roche, The Australian, 16 June 2015


It has become urgent and compelling to develop policies so that in the coming years the emission of carbon dioxide and other highly polluting gases is reduced drastically, for instance by replacing fossil fuels and by developing renewable energy sources. --Leaked Papal Encyclical, 15 June 2015

I am very concerned that climate science is becoming biased owing to biases in federal funding priorities and the institutionalization by professional societies of a particular ideology related to climate change. Many scientists, and institutions that support science, are becoming advocates for UN climate policies, which is leading scientists into overconfidence in their assessments and public statements and into failures to respond to genuine criticisms of the scientific consensus. In short, the climate science establishment has become intolerant to disagreement and debate, and is attempting to marginalize and de-legitimized dissent as corrupt or ignorant. Uncertainty and disagreement drive scientific progress. Stifling uncertainty and disagreement stifles scientific progress. --Judith Curry, House of Lords, 15 June 2015

Pope Francis has endorsed the science behind global warming and denounced the world’s political leaders for putting national self-interests ahead of action.--John Follain, Bloomberg, 16 June 2015

Member of Parliament David Davies has warned of the stubborn nature of organisations like Britain’s Royal Society – the oldest grouping of eminent scientists in the world – who have admitted that they will not accept any other thinking on global warming for at least “fifty years”, even if the data shows otherwise. -- Oliver Lane, Breitbart News, 16 June 2015

The [Royal Society] had two guys whose job it was to go around and persuade everyone that we’re all trying the ruin the economy. We pinned them down on this hiatus. They were arguing that yes, there might have been a hiatus, but warming might be going into the ocean, or it could be due to volcanic activity. So we asked at what point would you begin to accept there had been no warming. If there is no warming for five years, or ten years? Finally they conceded they would wait fifty years. Effectively, we’re all going to be dead before the Royal Society admits they’ve got their facts wrong. There could be absolutely no warming every year for the next fifty years, and the Royal Society would still maintain that climate change is a major problem. --David Davies, Breitbart News, 16 June 2015

 

Pam Geller's Atlas Shrugs

Greta Van Susteren’s In-Depth Interview with Pamela Geller - Last night I appeared on Greta Van Susteren’s On the Record on the FOX News Channel. Unlike the brief TV segment, Greta conducted an in-depth interview with me on her radio podcast, “Greta Talk.”

Click on this to play: Fox News Radio: Pamela Geller: “I Will Not Let Violent Threats Intimidate Me!”  Talk about rocketing into the public arena – Pamela Geller may have been an unknown until recently, but now she’s not only a strong voice against Islamic Jihadists… she’s a target. Literally. The guest on this episode of Greta Talk has been the target of assassination attempts since she started her campaign against them and what she refers to as...

Clear Channel Refuses AFDI Ads Countering ICNA’s Lies with the Truth About Muhammad - A good many Atlas readers have written me over the past couple of weeks, concerned about a deceptive ad that ICNA is running in a number of American cities. The Islamic Circle of North America is an Islamic organization that has been probed by the FBI for ties to terrorism. They are running a deceptive Muhammad propaganda campaign (above). You may remember their Sharia for America ad campaign here. So we created a counter campaign of truth, “The Truth About Muhammad.”  Clear Channel rejected our ad, saying it wasn’t very nice.  So we submitted a different ad, using Muhammad’s own quotes (below). That way Clear Channel could not say we were editorializing or opining.  ICNA works closely with radical Islamic...

Feds: Phoenix Muslims who attempted Muhammad cartoon mass murder considered Super Bowl attack - Here is more proof of what I have stated all along: our Garland, Texas art exhibit saved lives. With the arrest yesterday of Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem, a third jihadi in the Garland jihad terror attack, we learned that they had been plotting mass murder long before we announced our Muhammad art exhibit. If they had hit a softer target, the outcome would have been vastly different.  The indictment also says that others were involved, so expect more arrests. Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem met with the other Muslim terrorists involved in the Garland, Texas shooting in his home beginning in January, and provided the guns they used in the May 3 shooting.

Britain must ban Islamic sharia “kangaroo courts” which dish out vicious injustices and cruelty to women and children - I have published a number of pieces on the appalling treatment of women and children at the hands of the sharia court “justices,” but nothing changes — the savages are ruling the roost.  The British continue to surrender in installments. And either they will go quietly into the night or the people will revolt. When I said that the British government was, in fact, enforcing sharia law when they banned me from Great Britain, I was not overstating it. Last month it was announced that Islamic law was to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time. Under groundbreaking guidance produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of...

Islamic State (ISIS) savages release video showing a ‘spy’ having his hand and foot chopped off while tied to a cross - “A quote from the Qur’an is then shown. It reads: ‘The penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land.'” In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. But the free world is opting to support the savage.

New York: Muslim Student Plotted to Bomb New York City Landmark - ISIS is here. The war is here. And these Muslim soldiers didn’t travel from the Middle East to get here. Like Garland, Boston, etc., these are American Muslims waging jihad in the cause of Islam and the caliphate.  Again and again, more daily news stories of Muslims in America going jihad. Here is a Muslim student majoring in electrical circuitry at Queens College.  I repeat myself again: why does the media ignore, censor this widespread understanding of Islam? Why are so many American, European, Canadian Muslims aligning and/or joining the Islamic State?

 And the trend now is not to go to Syria or Iraq, but to wage jihad in the homeland. And while Muslim leaders pay lip service and mutter condemnation of the Islamic State,...

Observations From the Back Row!

Why are insurance rate increases so much higher than expected?  Instead of moderate rate increases for one more year, the big rate increases have begun. They are particularly large among the health insurers with the most enrollment--the carriers with the most data. Texas Blue Cross stands out. The health plan commented in its federal government rate filings that it covered 730,833 Obamacare individuals in 2014 with premium of $2.1 billion and claims totaling $2.5 billion--for a medical loss ratio of 119%. The plan further commented that, after the “3Rs” reinsurance adjustments, they lost 17% to 20% of premium in 2014--that would be about $400 million. And, they are only asking for a 20% rate increase......CareFirst Blue Cross of Maryland is asking for a 34% rate increase on its PPO plan and a 26.7% rate increase for its HMO…..The White House has said that about 11.4 million Americans are signed up for private health coverage through Obamacare’s insurance exchanges. But once you unravel the spin, what the latest numbers show is that the pace of enrollment has slowed down by more than half. If previous trends hold, Obamacare exchanges have enrolled roughly 5 million previously uninsured people……In the long term, this is the real failing of Obamacare and the real reason it will require reform no matter which party takes the White House in 2016. When you get down to it, the biggest problem with Obamacare is that it hasn’t been popular enough to work, and it hasn’t worked enough to be popular…..

Obamacare and the Rule of Law - In a speech Tuesday, President Obama said the Affordable Care Act has now been woven into the fabric of America.The president’s remarks come as the Supreme Court is preparing this month to decide King v. Burwell, a case that challenges whether the law ever actually authorized subsidies for health coverage paid out through federal exchanges. The details of Burwell reveal the degree to which the Obama administration’s handling of the ACA is ultimately at odds with ideals and aspirations that really are woven into the fabric of America: the rule of law and the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution…In other words, the challengers in King v. Burwell contend that the White House illegally authorized billions of dollars of taxes and spending, circumventing Congress and flouting the statutory text of the ACA by administrative decree. The accusation isn’t a stretch……Instead of going back to Congress, which would have meant compromising with Republicans on other changes to the law, the Obama administration circumvented the ACA and attempted to implement the administration’s preferred policy outcome by fiat. This is not a trifling matter.

House, SenateRepublicans Plan for King V. Burwell - Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said Tuesday that House and Senate Republicans are closing in on a backup plan for ObamaCare subsidies that they will release should the Supreme Court cripple the healthcare law this month.  Barrasso, who is leading the main Senate planning effort, said the plan would include some kind of temporary assistance for the 6.4 million people who could lose health insurance subsidies because of the case of King v. Burwell..He would not reveal exactly what kind of temporary assistance the bill includes. Johnson has proposed extending the insurance subsidies that already exist, while others like Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) have instead proposed a system of new tax credits.

Burwell Draws Lineon Subsidies - President Obama will oppose Republican plans that end key Affordable Care Act insurance requirements if the Supreme Court rules against the administration, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell said Wednesday.  Speaking at a House Ways and Means Committee hearing, Burwell specifically rejected a proposal from Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) that would extend Obamacare subsidies in states with federal exchanges until 2017 but end many insurance coverage requirements. Johnson’s proposal has 31 Republican cosponsors, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.).

Lament For Medicare’s Sustainable Growth - The genius of the SGR was that if doctor’s productivity improved more than the nation’s overall productivity, they got a raise. But if their productivity increase was slower, they got a pay cut, at least they were supposed to. SGR worked fine until 2002. Then practice costs started to increase at a significantly higher rate than the SGR permitted, and doctor’s pay was cut almost 5 percent. Well, that did not last long. Although the gap between overall productivity and physician’s productivity kept growing, along with the pay cuts indicated by the SGR, Congress enacted 17 short-term patches to make sure pay never decreased. The current patch expired on March 31, and doctors would have taken a pay cut of about one-fifth had Obama not signed the permanent fix. No politician has ever been recorded inquiring why doctors are not able to increase their productivity at the same rate as anyone else.   It might have something to do with the way Medicare determines what each procedure is worth Medicare’s centrally controlled system would make a Soviet planner blush…..Bear in mind that entitlement spending is on autopilot - Medicare appropriations are deemed mandatory, or at least they will be until our creditors decide they’ve had enough.

 Why Everything We 'Know' About Diet and Nutrition Is Wrong - For decades, the federal government has been advising Americans on what to eat. Those recommendations have been subject to the shifting sands of dietary science. And have those sands ever been shifting. At first, fat and cholesterol were vilified, while sugar was mostly let off the hook. Now, fat is fine (saturated fat is still evil, though), cholesterol is back, and sugar is the new bogeyman.  Why the sizable shift? The answer may be "bad science."  Every five years, the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, composed of nutrition and health experts from around the country, convenes to review the latest scientific and medical literature. From their learned dissection, they form the dietary guidelines. But according to a new editorial published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, much of the science they review is fundamentally flawed………