Look Into My Eyes.....And Believe!!!!

By Rich Kozlovich 

 This has been judicially placed over two articles dealing with the insanity of COP27.  The fraudulent claims, fraudulent science, the economic green scam, and the consequences of adopting their insane policies.   This is followed by an article that deals with reality. 

On November 20, 2022 Chris Morrison published this piece, South Pole Hits Record Cold November Temperatures saying:

Extreme cold records continue to tumble at the South Pole. Three recent days – November 16th, 17th and 18th – have recorded a daily record, with the 18th plunging to –45.2°C, compared with –44.7°C on the same day in 1987. The records follow the six-month winter of 2020-21, which was the coldest since records began in 1957. Inexplicably, all these facts and trends have escaped reporting in the mainstream media. The excuse might be that it is just weather, and temperatures have always moved up and down. But the excuse doesn’t seem to apply to the July 19th U.K. high of 40.3°C at RAF Coningsby, recorded at the side of the runway used by after-burning Typhoon jets. This record high has barely been out of the Net Zero headlines ever since. In fact, anything getting colder barely gets a look-in these days. 

The author goes on to note, "it has been a very bad year for climate catastrophists all round".

• Arctic sea ice is making a significant, near silent comeback. 
• Summer ice at the end of September covered 4.92 million square kilometres, which was 1.35 million sq kms higher than the 2012 low. 
• Over on land, the Greenland ice sheet may have increased in size over the last year to August 2022
• This is the fifth year out of the last seven that enough sea ice has formed along the west coast of Hudson Bay by mid-November for hunting polar bears to be able to head out to the ice
• Coral is growing on the Great Barrier Reef with a vengeance, just a few years after journalists and their ‘experts’ warned it was likely to disappear. 
• According to the latest satellite data, the global temperature hasn’t moved for over eight years.
• A little extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has led to significant ‘greening’ of the planet.
• 1.5 million Adelies had recently been discovered on the eastern side of the continent.
• Pakistan had been inundated as a result of recent monsoon floods.

Since all the recent poster scares are fast disappearing....... with or without CO₂’s help, ran out of steam over two decades ago..........the command-and-control Net Zero agenda is driven by politicised science and often derived from flawed climate models, corrupt surface temperature databases and invented weather ‘attribution’ stories. When the Guardian quotes ’scientists’, it is often referring to practitioners of observational disciplines such as geography, where modeled ‘impact’ predictions are widely promoted.

The Australian geologist Professor Ian Plimer gives short shrift to all the lies and obfuscations surround settled climate science. If it had been proved that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming, “there would be endless citation of the dozen or so seminal scientific papers demonstrating this proof”. Instead, he notes, there is a “deafening silence”. Climate cycles have not changed because humans are alive today, “and cannot be changed by feelings, ideology or legislation”. He also noted: “Bearers of validated facts are denigrated, cancelled and deemed controversial by those who have no counterargument, no ability to critically analyse, and who rely on self-interest and feelings.”

I've been following and writing about his fraud for 25 years, and I was right from the beginning, Global Warming was and is the greatest scientific fraud ever perpetrated on humanity. 

Of course the first question that should be answered is:  How can an autodidact bug man be right and trained scientists be wrong?  Its easy.  

I've read a history book or two. I'm an honest reader.  I'm only interested in the facts and I'm prepared to follow them wherever they may lead.  I actually believe in what was supposed to be the motto of science, De Omnibus Dubitandum, everything is to be questioned, and made that my personal motto, and I watched the fraud of the Hockey Stick and tree ring counting disintegrate, and the good old boy network of "scientists" approving of their own work calling it peer review.    And I knew about the Medieval Warming Period.  Guess what.  They didn't have cars then, nor did they have jet airplanes or coal fired power plants.  So why did the world get so warm, and in fact far warmer than it is now, or for what they're predicting for the future?  

It's all natural!

Saturday Schadenfreude: Al Gore inserts himself into Australia's election — and Aussie voters run the other way

May 18, 2019 By Monica Showalter

You'd think Al Gore, the big clown dumkopf who went off the rails after he lost the 2000 election to George W. Bush, would have learned a thing or two about what works in Western politics. One of those things is that foreign interference in another country's election is the most reliable way to get the opposite of the desired result.

Well meaning Brits who wrote letters to Ohio voters, after all, urging them to vote for John Kerry in 2004, were pretty much the example of how well that idea works out........... Read more

NASA senior scientist crushes Gore's new climate-change book

By Alicia Powe About | Email | Archive

A leading climate skeptic’s newly self-published e-book challenging the science behind Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Sequel” is drastically outselling the film’s companion book on Amazon. The former vice-president’s book, “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power,” was ranked 16,459th among paid Amazon e-books on Friday.  Meanwhile, climatologist Roy W. Spencer’s e-book, “An Inconvenient Deception: How Al Gore Distorts Climate Science and Energy Policy,” was ranked 328th.  In Amazon’s climatology category, Gore’s book was ranked 11th on Thursday, while Spencer’s was ranked first.  “Maybe people are finally wising up to Mr. Gore,” Spencer said on his Global Warming blog...........To Read More.....

Gore, Trump and Liberal Hypocrisy

Newt Gingrich

The media is beside itself that Wednesday night, in the final presidential debate, Donald Trump said he would wait until the election actually occurs to judge whether or not it was carried out fairly.
Apparently, some people think that when a Republican says he will watch closely to make there’s no corruption of the vote, he is a “threat to democracy” and even a “domestic insurrectionist.”
While on the other hand, they think that when a Democrat sends thousands of lawyers and observers to every polling place in the country to monitor voting and watch for irregularities--as Hillary Clinton will undoubtedly do--they are heroic defenders of the American people......To Read More.....

Clinton Calls Trump Remarks On Accepting Election Horrifying, But She And Gore Were Questioning 2000 Election Even Last Week

Hypocrisy, always a Democratic strong suit. She claimed Bush wasn’t elected, but ‘selected’ in 2000 and even seemed to still be putting out that nonsense as late as last week.

Via NRO:

It is completely irresponsible to argue that a president who reaches 270 electoral votes is not “elected” and legitimate, right, Hillary Clinton? Only a shameless partisan with no concern for democracy or our system of government would insist that president is not elected, long after he’s taken the oath of office. Trump is insanely irresponsible to suggest that this election may be rigged and the outcome fraudulent. Why, who on earth would ever make such a charge?  

At a private fund-raiser in Los Angeles for Democratic Sen. Jean Carnahan of Missouri, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the crowd that President Bush merely had been “selected” president, not elected, Newsweek reports in the current issue. Oh. That’s from October 2002.

Democrats cultivated that lack of acceptance, many still call Bush ‘illegitimate’.   John Kerry even questions the election of George Bush in 2004.   Debbie Wasserman-Schultz even claimed today that Al Gore actually won Florida.   Talk about ‘not accepting the result’….This appeared here

Blast from the past: Al Gore explains why he won’t concede election

By Thomas Lifson

The tidal wave of harrumphing over Donald Trump’s refusal to endorse the probity of the voting and vote-counting to come is quite amusing to me. I remember eight years of accusations from Bush 43 opponents that his election was “stolen” and that he was “selected, not elected.” So spare me the righteousness about the need to respect our sacred institutions, unless you can point to your similar criticism of Gore. Millennials are probably ignorant of this history. Here’s the video you can send your friends and relatives.....To Read More

Gore’s green money machine

Posted on October 13, 2012 by Anthony Watts

Excerpted from The Liberal War on Transparency by Chris Horner

So, Al Gore came to do good and ended up doing really, really well, according to the Washington Post. That’s actually not unique for Washington, except possibly as a matter of scale: Gore went from being worth $2 million when leaving office to about $100 million now.  

Gore, of course, “invested” in or otherwise found profitable arrangements with many companies whose financing mostly comes courtesy of the taxpayer, either directly, or indirectly in that private money flocks to that which politicians wed themselves to — the “halo effect” — on the knowledge that once the spigot opens it is difficult to turn off for fear of having a taxpayer-funded flop on their hands. I couldn’t help but be reminded, by this story, of the personnel executing these programs for President Obama, he of the $90 billion in “green energy” money squandered on boondoggles whose own owners’ sales pitch for the dough was unless you give me this money, I won’t exist.  To Read More….

I Thought You Might Be Interested.

By Rich Kozlovich

There is an article which appeared in the American Thinker by Robert Ferguson this month that is worth reading called, The Real Climate Agenda. I decided to post one of his readers comments that I felt was worth repeating. Unfortunately I have no way of getting Patrick49's permission, so I hope that if he should see his work repeated here he will officially and graciously grant that permission.

Posted by: Patrick49 Aug 07, 03:50 AM

Even a cursory, honest review of the recent climate history shows global temperature peaked in 1998 according to recent observations and now despite computer projections failing to forecast a cooling phase, some experts provide an additional 10 to 20 year window for continued cooling bring the total to a 20 to 30 year of cooling in a predicted warming world. Even now we have a number of global warming advocates, including NASA, predicting an extended cooling period while their computer programs continue to predicate global warming as the CO2 increases from its present level of approximately 0.0375 percent of the atmosphere. The 3,000 Argo ocean monitors, operational since 2003, have found no ocean warming; only a slight decrease. Those environmentalist advocating to scrub 'global warming' from their vocabulary and replace it with meaningless, vague descriptions intended to confuse the public are continuing the greatest scam since Madoff made off with $50 billion.

Politicians should expand their knowledge of the science of “our deteriorating atmosphere.” nee 'global warming' and they could start by studying the 650 scientists who issued a strong dissent to the man made global warming theory in a letter to the recent UN Climate change conference held in Poland. Unfortunately anyone who opposes the computer generated doom and gloom scenarios is labeled a 'denier' or 'heretic'. There is a long list of science 'heretics', Copernicus and Galileo are two that proved to be right against a false consensus scientific belief. While Einstein and Bohr had headline grabbing civilized discussions, often described as debates, on Bohr's theory of quantum mechanics, any attempt in today's world to conduct a learned discussion of global warming, or cooling, or CO2 is met with vitriol filled attacks on men and women with impeccable scientific credentials. While paying homage to a trio of gurus of climate change, nee global warming, who are a motley crew.

• Al Gore a non-scientists, a C university student, a divinity school dropout, a lawyer with no science studies, an majority owner/investor in a company selling 'Carbon Credits' with a vested interest in limiting CO2 for profiteering and the producer of a movie that the British Courts found to have 9 or 11 inaccuracies and could not be shown in British schools without identifying and explanation of the inaccurate claims.support@renewableenergyworld.com
• James Hansen, manager of the NASA department that produced incorrect temperature data for six years, 2000- 2006, more recently issued completely incorrect temperature data for October 2008 which led to headlines claiming the 'hottest October on record" and testified in an English Court that civil disobedience and destruction of property is proper to reduce CO2 emissions.
• Michael Mann, a 'scientist' who used statistical legerdemain to eradicate the medieval warm period and the Middle Age 'Little Ice Age’ to give a perfectly straight handle on his 'Hockey stick' curve which was debunked by two Canadian statistical experts but is still the centerpiece of Al Gore's movie.

Gore, Hansen and Mann would have been exposed as political hacks and scientific frauds years ago if real scientists were given a chance to be heard. The intent of the CO2 causes AGW 'Chicken Little the sky is falling' scare is to impose government control on the total energy market. To shut down a gasoline or diesel engine without stopping the fuel flow it is simple, plug the exhaust pipe and in the old days a readily available potato or corn cob could be used. CO2 is the exhaust of the world's greatest economic engine ever imagined and stopping, rationing, taxing or controlling CO2 emissions will effectively place the world's economy in the hands of politicians and environmentalist who think that ANWR is a pristine wilderness but they don't vacation there. The future is '1984' in real time with the Big Brothers in power handing out 'carbon ration cards' to control your energy choices.

.